Connect with us

Published

on

We’ve reached the last episode of John Carpenter’s Suburban Screams. And now that I’ve seen the entire season, I’d like to say something directly to John Carpenter if I may. Mr. Carpenter, I’m a big fan. Have been since I was a child. So I ask this with all due respect. Did you lose a bet? Do you owe people money? Is that why you did this? Because otherwise, I’m entirely confused.

The story

Our last episode tells the story of a woman named Beth Spierer. Her life is shattered when someone starts to call her and deliver horrific, violent messages.

These calls and texts get worse and worse. They often include pictures of her with scratches over her eyes or pictures of a dildo. The calls start coming to her work as well.

Beth tries to change her number, blocks calls and even goes to the police. But no matter what she does, she can’t escape the horrifying calls from the violent stalker.

Advertisement

What worked

The acting in this episode was fairly good. At least when compared to most of this season. It isn’t good when compared to most other shows, but for this episode it was fantastic. All of the actors involved knew what they were doing. And they are not part of the criticism I’m going to levy in the next few paragraphs.

Julie Stevens as Beth in Suburban Screams.

What didn’t work

I can honestly say that this episode of Suburban Screams should not have been made. Full stop, this episode should have died before it breathed its first breath.

My reasons for saying this are twofold. The first is that the story just isn’t that interesting. Please understand, that I’m not being dismissive of Beth’s plight. What happened to her, and what continues to happen to her, is horrible. I have nothing but sympathy for her. But her story, while touching, isn’t unique. Lots of people are stalked, harassed, threatened. A content creator I follow had someone try to break into her house with a screwdriver. My husband had a stalker before we were dating. A friend of mine had to stay in a shelter for a while because she was being harassed. And I don’t know a single person, man woman, or nonbinary, who hasn’t gotten an unwanted genital pic on social media.

It’s like finding out someone you don’t know and have never heard of before has cancer. It’s sad, but it’s not news.

Again, this isn’t at all to say that I don’t care about care about what’s happening to Beth. I care about her, and her wellbeing. This is the second reason why this episode should never have been made.

Advertisement

There is no doubt in my mind that if Beth’s stalker is still alive, they know about this episode. They probably have a Google notification set up for Beth’s name. And we just do not know how this stalker is going to respond. Maybe they’ll get off on it. Maybe it will enrage them and they’ll do something even worse to Beth. Maybe they’ll feel so much shame for this they’ll decide to take out themselves and Beth in one go.

There was no effort to hide Beth’s name. Or the names of her friends. There was no effort at all to protect her from whatever fallout there was from this.

This is not Beth’s fault. She has had to do enough to protect herself. This was irresponsible of the showrunners. And if God forbid, something happens to any of these people, the showrunners will have to bear some of the responsibility for that.

I liked it so much better when we were talking about wet ghosts and pizza box ouija boards.

Is it real?

This question for this episode is, unfortunately, a no-brainer. Yes, I believe that Beth Spierer was stalked and harassed by an unknown assailant. Yes, I further believe that when she went to the police the detective probably sexually harassed her.

Advertisement

This is why we chose the bear.

In short, of course, this episode is real. I honestly wish it wasn’t.

All in all, this whole series was a huge disappointment. And threatening the wellbeing of a stalker survivor was just the last straw. I don’t know if another season is planned. But if it is, I doubt if I’ll be tuning in.

1 out of 5 stars (1 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

Little Shop of Horrors – Musical Madness Review

Published

on

So I can’t believe that no one has reviewed Little Shop of Horrors the Broadway musical here on Haunted MTL. We have seen the old 1960 Roger Corman version in a Joe Bob Briggs special here, but not the Broadway smash hit and movie. This surprises me given its cheeky sense of humor and quirky colorful but dark themes. I personally love this musical, but then again I’m probably biased seeing as how I’m a Disney Renaissance kid, and Howard Ashman was influential in that movement as well. And the movie version is directed by Frank Oz, so you know the puppetry is top notch.

Little Shop of Horrors movie poster
Little Shop of Horrors movie poster

Spoiler alert: I hate revealing too much in my reviews but I will touch on some topics that reveal themes from within. So if you somehow managed to completely miss this under whatever rock you’ve been hiding since 1982, I’d recommend watching it. Right now. What are you waiting for, like seriously? Here’s a link to Amazon Prime even. Feel free to come back afterwards and read the rest of this review. And you’re welcome.

Little Shop of Horrors focuses on a flesh-eating plant. Whether it came from outer space or is a weird hybrid of some kind of souped up Venus flytrap is actually not that relevant. Hell, it could be a Burp special, as featured here previously. The plant’s origin story doesn’t actually matter all that much. What’s important is that it convinces protagonist Seymour to care for it, which starts off a little more innocently and ends in a killing spree that claims even the lives of both Seymour and his beloved Audrey by the end. Because it’s a hungry plant and it needs blood and fresh meat.

As you already know, my father was a dentist. So reactions to Orin Scrivello DDS could go either way. But in the movie version Steve Martin does an excellent job portraying the sadist, and you can’t help but kind of love him for it (especially in the scene with Bill Murray as the masochist patient) for all that you’ll still cheer a little when he gets fed to the carnivorous flesh-eating plant. The Broadway death by laughing gas is his just desserts and well portrayed, and just one of the beautiful dark comedy blossoms within this musical foray into inappropriate humor that ranges into such taboo topics as unintended suicide, relationship abuse, and socioeconomic disparity.

Steve Martin in Little Shop of Horrors
Steve Martin in Little Shop of Horrors

Anyway, I give the musical and movie 4.0 Cthulhus. 4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

The main reason I wanted to review this was actually because the Smoky Valley Theater high school recently presented Little Shop of Horrors in Lindsborg, Kansas in November 2024, and I wanted to give them a shoutout. The actors and actresses did a fabulous job with it. I especially liked that they further explored the Audrey II character of the plant by casting it as an actual actress, saving on large-scale puppeteering and bringing new life to the musical. This worked much better than I had anticipated when I’d heard of the change, with superb adaptive costuming that evolved over time. I would kill for that flytrap cape complete with its red and emerald satin and toothy accent trim. Maybe at the next solar eclipse…

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Dexter Original Sin Fender Bender, The Perfect Mix of Comedy and Sadness

Published

on

Episode four of Dexter Original Sin was an interesting one. It was equal parts funny and upsetting.

It also brought up an issue I’ve always had with Dexter.

Let’s discuss.

The story

Our story doesn’t waste any time, starting with the kidnapped boy, Jimmy Powell, hanging dead from a bridge.

Advertisement

This crime scene turns out to be a little too much even for Dexter. So, he decides to go hunting. He discovers a killer for hire called Mad Dog. And let me save you the Google. Yes, that is Joe Pantoliano who played Cypher in The Matrix.

Christian Slater and Patrick Gibson in Dexter Original Sin.

So desperate to feel better, Dexter maybe rushes things a little bit. Which, it should surprise no one, leads to a hilarious and disastrous result.

What worked

There has always been a part of the later seasons of Dexter that bothered me. Spoilers ahead.

When Deb learns about Dexter’s Dark Passenger, she goes right off the deep end. This includes, among other things, heroin use. Which always seemed out of character for me. Now, finding out she was experimenting with drugs as a teen, that makes more sense. While I won’t say this is as good as Deep Space 9 retconning the infamous stage hand incident in Troubles with Tribbles, it was nice.

Dexter: The Complete Series Collection [Blu-ray]
  • PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Dexter(TM) is a crime drama about Dexter Morgan, a man who leads a double life as an incredibly likeable forensics expert for the Miami Police Department and as an emotionless vigilante serial killer
  • Taught by his foster father to harness his lust for blood and killing, Dexter lives by his own strict moral code – he only kills murderers who can’t otherwise be brought to justice
  • Dexter is a killer who grapples with fitting into society while, at the same time, he struggles with his inability to feel emotion

Last update on 2025-01-05 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

I also really enjoyed Joe Pantoliano’s character, Mad Dog. He was funny in just the right way. Not slapstick. Not over the top, because that never would have fit here. But he’s animated and joyful in a way that no other character is. He’s clearly got his priorities right, as we can see when he begs Dex not to smash his guitar. He was just so fun. And this episode needed this levity since the rest of it was so heavy.

Advertisement
Joe Pantoliano and Patrick Gibson in Dexter Original Sin.

As we discussed, this episode started with a poor dead boy. This caused both Dexter and Harry to completely ignore Deb. Furious, she shouts what must have been the best and most emotionally devastating line in the series so far.

“How am I supposed to compete with a dead kid?”

Now the question I’m left with, the question that I’m sure the writers intended to leave us with, is this. Does she mean the dead boy her dad’s investigating? Or does she mean her dead brother?

Does she know she has a dead brother?

I felt like these two elements, the levity brought by Mad Dog and the heavy death of the little boy worked really well together. It keeps the story balanced, keeps it from being too much.

Advertisement

What didn’t work

While this episode cleared up something about Deb for me, it also brought to light something I’ve never appreciated about the character Dexter.

He’s not a sociopath.

A sociopath is a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience. They would not, generally, have a different response to a child being killed than an adult. But Dexter has always had that issue.

It makes him a better person, but it shows a misunderstanding of the character in the books. And, frankly, a misunderstanding of the condition.

I also need to complain about the melon scene. Normally, everyone knows the point of smashing a melon in forensics. Whether accurate to the real world or not, melons are used to show what might happen if someone’s skull is crushed. The point is to see the difference in different heights, and where the blood splatter might go.

Advertisement

If one is going to spray blood where they want it to be or put a little metal plate on one melon so that it doesn’t break naturally, then it defeats the whole purpose of dropping them.

Now, some of you might think this was the point of the scene. Dexter is very new at this. Maybe he was doing it wrong, showing a lack of understanding of the process. I have two issues with this. One, Dexter is pre-med, he should have known better. And two, Masuka is not new. And he was standing right there the whole time. Why didn’t he say something? This was just a clumsy and confusing scene in an episode that was otherwise well done.

All in all, this was another good episode. I loved the blend of funny and heartbreaking. I loved the special guest star. And I loved the cliffhanger ending. I can’t wait to see what happens next.

4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies n TV

The Dangers of On-Site Research for Actors, or Devil’s Workshop

Written and directed by Chris Von Hoffmann, Devil’s Workshop is a horror drama released in 2022.

Published

on

Written and directed by Chris Von Hoffmann, Devil’s Workshop is a horror drama released in 2022. This R-rated film stars Radha Mitchell, Timothy Granaderos, Sarah Coffey, and Emile Hirsch. As of this review, it’s available on Freevee.

Clayton (Timothy Granaderos) is a struggling actor on the verge of the biggest role in his life. After receiving a callback, he takes this opportunity seriously, seeking out a real demonologist to better understand the role. However, Eliza (Radha Mitchell) forces him to experience the spiritual… and the demonic.

A man and a woman talk within a living room setting.
Radha Mitchell as Eliza and Timothy Granaderos as Clayton

What I Like About Devil’s Workshop

The chemistry between Eliza and Clayton remains the highlight of the film. Radha Mitchell’s Eliza evokes a mystique that makes it easy to believe Clayton’s desire to learn more. Timothy Granaderos’ Clayton captures the character’s insecurities while giving just enough for viewers to sense something deeper.

Devil’s Workshop seems to accomplish much with a limited budget. The special effects (though limited) work surprisingly well. While it wouldn’t be an issue if it indulged in camp, Devil’s Workshop seeks to elevate its horror without undermining the tone.

Dancer: A HauntedMTL Charity Anthology for Ukraine’s Children (HauntedMTL Charity Anthologies)
  • Step into the shadows with “Dancer,” a spine-chilling anthology that pirouettes between horror and hope
  • Curated by the visionary Jim Phoenix, this collection brings together master storytellers in a dance of darkness that will leave you breathless

Last update on 2025-01-05 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

As the plot unfolds, there’s just enough reason to rewatch the film and catch some of the groundwork leading to that conclusion. I am surprised at how well the film holds up in this regard, keeping the viewers engaged despite a slower burn.

Advertisement

There’s something genuinely haunting about the ending, as Clayton’s backstory and the demon’s manipulation synergize to make a few disturbing scenes. The success of this synergy stems from the odd relationship that Eliza and Clayton develop within the film, becoming confidants to drastically different ends.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

Clayton stands at a particularly low point in his life, working through his unresolved family issues and feeling like a failure. This insecurity leads to Clayton’s troubles.

A sexual assault occurs between a female assaulter and male victim. Unlike many films that explore this subject matter, this assault isn’t a tool for a cheap laugh. However, beyond the cruelty of the act, it isn’t explored to any degree beyond the shock and horror of the act.

A woman stares at the viewer with a knife.
Getting to the Point

What I Dislike about Devil’s Workshop

Emile Hirsch’s Donald plays a rival to Clayton, but the performance lingers on camp. Making the character more jarring, he leads a subplot with little value to the story. While I understand that Donald acts as a foil and antagonist, he’s rarely pitted against Clayton. Instead, he takes away from the actual plot.

Another potential reason for this subplot is to allow Sarah Coffey’s Nikki to shine. As a friend to Donald, the character makes his subplot tolerable. However, it still provides no substance to the plot. It seems like a massive misstep to waste her talent as a side character on an irrelevant deviation.

If the above issues suggest a desire to expand the film’s runtime, exploring the occult themes in Devil’s Workshop would better serve the plot. Devil’s Workshop works best when following its demonic lore and rituals, so why not dive further into the diabolical? Clayton sought to study a demonologist for the role, and demonology remains a lightly explored topic.

The mix between campy and more serious performances doesn’t create a cohesive film. Perhaps these campier scenes bring levity, but the film doesn’t linger in its darker material long enough to require these intermissions.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

Devil’s Workshop provides a disturbing horror within a tight runtime, requiring little to earn its investment. The low budget shows in places but rarely where it matters most, pulling off a traumatizing ending to earn its place. While it’s far from the most terrifying film, it’s an unnerving watch for those interested. The one issue I return to is this odd subplot following a pointless character.
3 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending