Just about every review for the new Mortal Kombat film mentions more or less the same thing: the game. Whether it honors the game, changes things from the game, is faithful to the game, or is made for fans of the game. It always mentions the game. There’s nothing wrong with that, of course. It is based on a game after all, a very popular one, whose fans will make up the core audience of the film, but what about those who know almost nothing about Mortal Kombat? Will we enjoy the film? Will we even be able to understand it? Will it be as cheesy and fun as the 1995 original?
The answer to all those questions is yes, and depending on who you are, maybe a slightly less enthusiastic yes to that last part.
My only prior knowledge of Mortal Kombat comes from the original 1995 film and some quick internet research, so I know almost nothing about the source material. For someone like me, a Mortal Kombat outsider, this film is just a reboot so that’s what I’m judging it on.
From the very start, this movie has its flaws. In spite of a thrilling, well-choreographed and bloody beginning that instantly gets you hooked, Mortal Kombat kicks off a bit vanilla when it introduces its main hero, only it’s not someone you’ll recognize. Instead of Liu Kang and his luscious mullet leading the audience, this movie follows washed-up MMA fighter Cole Young.
Without any personality, the guy may be the protagonist but he’s treated like a stock character meaning he’s a boring “everyday character” that the audience is supposed to relate to, who was apparently created specifically for this movie. If Mortal Kombat has one major flaw that brings the energy down, it’s Cole. He’s the hero that you forget the moment the camera changes position, no matter how much effort actor Lewis Tan puts in the role. The film just doesn’t know how to use him properly. His only purpose is to introduce the plot and to add in a connection to another character later in the story.
Cole is dragged into the world of Mortal Kombat when he discovers that his strange dragon birthmark isn’t actually a birthmark at all but a sign that he’s been chosen to fight in a mighty tournament that determines the fate of the world. There are others like him, the champions of Earth, who are being hunted down by the deadly Sub-Zero/Bi-Han so that the riveling Outworld can ensure victory in the next tournament.
Just as Sub-Zero comes for Cole, he and his boring family who I honestly didn’t know where his wife and daughter until the film literally spelled it out, are saved by another champion named Jax and his partner Sonya Blade. While receiving their help, he meets Kano, a wild psychopathic mercenary who also happens to be another champion.
After a few bad encounters with the Outworld fighters, they go meet Lord Raiden, the protector of the Earthrealm, and some more champions, Liu Kang and Kung Lao (two guys that really should be given their own spin-off), and they begin their training montage leading up to the big boss battle at the end during which we never hear the epic “MORTAL KOMBAT” shout play over it and that’s just a shame. The song “Techo Syndrome” is there but the “MORTAL KOMBAT” shout isn’t really there until the end credits.
All in all, it’s a good movie. Wacky and fun, and just violent enough. Video game adaptations rarely ever make cinematic masterpieces, but Mortal Kombat has enough to make up for whatever faults it may have. Those saving points are Sub-Zero and Scorpion and any scene where they’re together, Liu Kang and Kung Lao, Kano, Sonya Blade, and the entire opening sequence that could have been part of its own separate movie.
I was never that crazy about the 1995 Mortal Kombat. I liked it plenty, but it wasn’t exactly a film I rushed out to add to my Tribble like multiplying DVD collection. Simon McQuoid, in his feature directorial debut, has a much more serious take on the story while giving it a darker tone that I rather enjoyed.
The fight scenes were spectacular, and some of the characters are charismatic enough to carry chunks of the film on their own, however, as a whole, it’s kind of a mess. It’s as if someone took a martial arts fantasy film and stitched in scenes and expositions from a video game. This makes sense given that it’s an adaptation, one that would be confusing without a few explanations, but when viewed objectively it comes off a bit awkward. Even if I wasn’t the biggest fan of the first Mortal Kombat, it explained the rules of the game without taking you out of the plot, which, unfortunately, this movie ended up doing. Also, a part of me is a bit put out that Liu Kang was bumped down to supporting character this time around.
Maybe for the sequel they can focus on one or two characters instead of so many that way they won’t have to cram so much into one story. The ending hints at the introduction of Johnny Cage, played by Linden Ashby in the original film, and Joe Taslim who plays Sub-Zero has said that he has a four-film contract if the franchise takes off. So a sequel is definitely a possibility.
Rachel Roth is a writer who lives in South Florida. She has a degree in Writing Studies and a Certificate in Creative Writing, her work has appeared in several literary journals and anthologies.
@WinterGreenRoth
What Lies Below (2020) is a horror film written and directed by Braden R. Duemmler. This TV-MA film stars Ema Horvath, Trey Tucker, and Mena Suvari. The film is available on Hoopla, Tubi TV, Peacock Premium Plus, the Roku Channel, History Vault, and Amazon Prime Video.
Libby (Ema Horvath) returns to her family’s lake house before leaving for college. Her mother (Mena Suvari as Michelle Wells) uses this opportunity to have Libby meet her boyfriend (Trey Tucker as John Smith). Despite the draw of a handsome scientist, the more Libby learns about the man, the stranger he seems.
What I Like about What Lies Below
The film balances the line between sci-fi and supernatural horror. One of those options seems to fit slightly better, but What Lies Below doesn’t feel the need to tell its audience some objective truth. Instead, it respects the viewer to come to their own conclusion.
Ema Horvath has the most to work with and provides an interesting character in Libby. Libby remains a reserved and shy character, displaying an unhealthy dose of longing that requires subtle habits and glances to communicate her thoughts. Yet, the viewer often knows what she’s thinking.
Last update on 2025-01-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
That said, there’s a level of camp across all the performances. It’s hard to say if this is an intentional choice but viewing it as an intentional choice adds to these performances. However, it’s worth mentioning this as a hard selling point.
Without diving into spoilers, the ending did surprise me to some degree. I was wrong about how hard What Lies Below would end. In short, this film gets surprisingly dark. It doesn’t linger in that darkness, but What Lies Below doesn’t compromise its plot for a comforting conclusion.
Tired Tropes and Triggers
Body horror seems to be the most obvious trigger to mention. It’s less the body mutating kind of horror and more the parasite growing inside the body kind. Most of this remains implied, or we see only the aftermath, but the points seem clear.
A sexual assault leads to a general shift in the film. Part of this assault is handled with uncomfortable realism as the survivor doubts the severity of the assault and receives pushback when she reveals the truth. While this realism certainly has its place, it also deserves a warning.
What I Dislike about What Lies Below
This film might have been better served diving into its campier side instead of loosely adding those moments. Ultimately, the performances suffer from a lack of commitment, teetering between a serious approach or a campier execution.
What Lies Below is far from a high-budget film. While it can hide its lower budget, there are clear moments that visibly show the strain. If it committed to the camp or creativity of many B-films, it might better haunt its viewers.
What Lies Below only loosely attempts to channel the creature feature. It occasionally introduces something more bestial and inhuman but doesn’t give more than a glimpse. With the revelry given to lampreys and the title, I wrongly suspected something within the watery depths to show.
While the film remains dark, I won’t particularly call it haunting. While the seductive creature isn’t as common as its female counterpart, it’s far from an untested concept. The major problem with What Lies Below is that it doesn’t do enough to stand out or linger in the mind. Instead, it hints at something brewing, smacks you with a dark end, and calls it a day.
Final Thoughts
What Lies Below implements elements of a memorable creature feature but fails to haunt its viewers. While its restraint in explaining its plot deserves respect, it doesn’t supplement that with something terrifying enough to break the surface. It’s hard to recommend this film to eager viewers looking for a creature in its feature. Instead, it might better suit an audience who craves a subtle mystery by the lakeside. (2.5 / 5)
Oh, the 90s, the renaissance of the slasher genre after it crashed and burned in the mid-80s. Halloween H20 is the seventh installment in the Halloween franchise. It hits a reset button on the canon, which utilizes the strong points of the decade. Without any further ado, let’s dive in!
Plot
We start with seemingly random characters as they die at the hands of Michael Myers, who is back for vengeance. He wants to find Laurie and is not willing to let anyone else stand in his way. Here is where the franchise diverges into a different canon that ignores all the movies after the second one.
After a wonderful tribute to the late Donald Pleasance we see Laurie. She is now a headmistress at a boarding school in California, with a new name and a son. Laurie appears functioning on the outside, but she is still traumatized by the past events, medicating both with prescription meds and alcohol. Not even her love interest (a fellow teacher) knows anything about her past.
Her son John doesn’t understand the severity of what his mother has been through. He repeatedly tells her to get over it (not the brightest moment despite him being a teenage boy). More teenage characters are introduced in the form of his girlfriend played by Michelle Williams in her Dawson’s Creek prime, and two friends.
John and the group want to stay at the empty boarding school while everyone else goes on a camping trip. What they think will be a romantic couples’ weekend turns into anything but. Michael catches up to Laurie and finds his way into the premises. What ensues is a blood-shed with some creative kills and full-on suspense.
Laurie takes a stand against Michael as she chases him down axe in hand, ready to finish this once and for all. This leads to a showdown with a glorious finale as Laurie decapitates Michael, seemingly ending his reign for good (or so we think).
Overall thoughts
Halloween H20 is a great overhaul of a franchise that was running out of steam. It encapsulates everything about the 90s, from the camera work to the soundtrack to the cheesy one-liners. It has a star-studded cast of the sweethearts of the decade and who could be mad at Jamie Lee Curtis’s comeback?
This movie takes an interesting approach to Laurie’s character. She spends the second movie kind of helpless waiting for someone to save her, however this time she takes the lead and faces her trauma head-on. Other characters have just enough development to make you care for their survival. The atmosphere is very reminiscent of the first one as well, with a bit of a slow burn before the big finish.
Ultimately, this is the most entertaining instalment of the franchise and has a lot of rewatchability for those movie nights. Slasher 2.0 at its best.
The New Daughter (2009) is a PG-13 horror film and Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut. The film is based on John Connolly’s short story of the same name. The New Daughter stars Kevin Costner, Ivana Baquero, Samantha Mathis, and Gattlin Griffith. As of this review, the film is available on VUDU Free, The CW, Hoopla, Tubi TV, Freevee, and Plex, with additional purchase options.
John James (Kevin Costner) moves his children to a rural South Carolina town to start anew after his wife leaves him. Louisa James (Ivana Baquero) can’t stand this change, and Sam James (Gattlin Griffith) doesn’t understand why his mother isn’t with them. But after finding a burial mound, their attitudes suddenly switch. As John uncovers more of their new home’s history, he realizes there’s much to fear.
What I Like About Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut
Despite its 2009 release date, the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Films nominated it for the Saturn Awards’ Best DVD Release in 2011. As Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut, the film manages to hold an audience with a tight script and direction.
The acting sells this ominous mystery, which might otherwise become obscure amongst others in the genre. In particular, Kevin Costner’s John James and Ivana Baquero’s Louisa James center The New Daughter around their characters’ strained father-daughter relationship.
Ultimately, The New Daughter thrives in its atmosphere and execution. If we take the film plot point by plot point, The New Daughter doesn’t break the mold. Between Luiso Berdejo’s direction and the writing of John Travis and John Connolly, however, the film executes this uncomfortable tension that invests viewers.
Last update on 2025-01-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
It’s in The New Daughter‘s execution where it haunts its audience. There’s this uncomfortable powerlessness as John attempts to protect his family against the horrors in the mound and its corrupting influence.
The ending might seem uncommitted, but I would disagree. The film executes a balance between hope and horror that leads to ambiguity but doesn’t leave the audience dissatisfied. A bolder film might conclude with an unhappy ending, but The New Daughter gives a sliver of hope in its dark ending.
Tired Tropes and Triggers
A cat dies in the film. The act isn’t shown, but I understand this can be a dealbreaker. In loose connection, there are also animal carcasses.
There’s a loose and underdeveloped connection to Native American mythology, following along the idea of “Indian (Native Americans) burial grounds.” While this initial thought proves inaccurate, it still holds familiar plot points that might irk some.
There are some strange decisions revolving around Louisa. Needless to say, a part of the plot revolves around her beginning puberty. While nothing is explicit, the creatures require a mate, which suggests sexual assault.
What I Dislike about Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut
The aesthetic of the burial mound doesn’t seem particularly noteworthy. This becomes a problem when it looks like any hill in a forest. I don’t particularly see how the James family recognizes this as something strange and worth fixating on. As the film progresses, there are obvious reasons, but the aesthetic doesn’t execute this strangeness.
As addressed above, the premise remains familiar and safe, perhaps too safe. A family moves into a rural home, escaping a past withheld from the audience. The mother is out of the picture, and the father struggles to connect with his young daughter. I don’t subscribe to the idea that these are lazy points, but it might seem formulaic with how thick it dominates the film’s beginning.
Final Thoughts
The New Daughter is an impressive feature-length debut but one with notable flaws. There’s a familiarity and safety in the plot that hinders what could have been. However, the ominous mystery and acting provide the needed execution to create a haunting experience. If you’re looking for a horror following a terrified family against supernatural creatures, The New Daughter delivers.
G
September 19, 2021 at 7:50 am
This mk 11 i been expecting a lot of more but this game is scrap and very cheap made((