Connect with us

Published

on

Welcome to “Notes from the Last Drive-In,” Haunted MTL’s review and recap series of The Last Drive-In with Joe Bob Briggs on Shudder. This time we cover the “Halloween Hoedown” which brought us 1983’s Angel, and 1980’s Terror Train. We also were given two pretty important guests when it comes to modern horror – director David Gordon Green and mega-producer Jason Blum of Blumhouse Productions. They stopped by the trailer (yay, back at the trailer!) and talked a bit about the upcoming Halloween Kills, horror as a whole, and even joined in on some light Halloween fun.

But, looking at the movie selection – it doesn’t feel very Halloweeny, does it? Let’s get into it, shall we?

Angel (1983)

Angel (1983) is Roger Vincent O’Neil’s exploitation revenge thriller about teenage Molly, who by day is a sweet honors student, but by night is Angel, a sex worker on the streets of Hollywood Boulevarde, living with an eclectic community of sex workers and outcasts. However, Angel soon finds herself in the midst of a serial killer’s spree who targets people in her line of work.

The movie is not exactly horror but certainly delves into horror themes of predation, loss of innocence, poverty. It is a very tense film and at times it can be absolutely gutwrenching. In lesser hands, the film may have come off as cloying and preachy, but the approach here is excellent and ultimately becomes a rousing story by the final act. It may seem strange to read, but a film about a 15-year-old sex worker is quite an empowering film, arguably feminist to a great degree.

Advertisement
The Last Drive-In Halloween Hoedown Angel (1983) poster
The poster does a terrible job of selling this movie.

It is the brainchild of Robert Vincent O’Neil who directed and co-wrote the film with Joseph Michael Cala. The film was produced by Donald P. Borchers and distributed by 80s genre-powerhouse New World Pictures. The cast is led by then 21-year old Donna Wilkes playing Molly/Angel, with Dick Shawn, Rory Calhoun, and Susan Tyrell rounding out the oddballs she associates with. Cliff Gorman plays Lieutenant Andrews, the copy who keeps an eye out for Molly, and John Diehl plays the nameless killer.

As a whole, the performances are fantastic across the board. The film uses its veteran and character actors to a great degree of effectiveness. Particularly those in Molly’s street family. Dick Shawn and Susan Tyrell have some utterly fantastic exchanges, and Rory Calhoun, the western veteran, ends up as the coolest gun-slinging street uncle anyone could ask for. Gorman’s portrayal of a hard-working cop is good and actually results in a cop who does good things – though some of his methods may be questionable. It is especially helpful that there is no sign that he wants to help Molly beyond the fact he genuinely is worried about this kid. In a lesser movie, it might play up some sort of cringe-inducing romantic element.

The two performances I would focus on here are Donna Wilkes’ and John Diehl’s. Wilkes is good, even as a relative unknown, to keep up with actors like Shawn, Calhoun, and Tyrell. She is completely charming and does some fantastic emoting with her eyes. Her work as Molly crafts an incredibly sympathetic and strong character. This is especially true as her character changes and grows, becoming the hunter by the film’s final act. Her rich characterization and growth are complemented by John Diehl’s enigmatic and unstable killer who remains unnamed, with only a single line of dialogue after he has been chased down by a 15-year-old girl wielding a revolver in her canary-yellow sundress. True to his skill here, he eats an egg in the most disgusting and horrifying way ever seen and it is a wonderful, stomach-turning bit of characterization.

As for the more technical elements of the film, the cinematography of Andrew Davis is excellent. Using some clever camera tricks and B-roll he manages to really populate the scenes during a time when crowds weren’t as heavy. His photographic eye would serve him well as a director of action thrillers like Under Siege and The Fugitive. Also, he directed Holes, oddly enough. Charles Bornstein’s editing, particularly during the final “chase” of the film is also excellent and combined with Davis’ framing goes a long way toward making the role reversal work.

Also of note, the score by Craig Safan utilized heavy synthesizers and gives the film the aural landscape of the 1980s without diving too deep into what would become the cliche 1980s sound. Even more impressive is that the score was written in less than a week.

Joe Bob-servations

Joe Bob’s observations about the film are about what you would expect: funny and educational. Many of his observations and facts about the production naturally work their way into my review for context. What I want to talk about is a bit of fun during the segments. The prevailing theme of the night was a level of cantankerousness regarding the fandom and the previous Halloween special. It was fun and the grouchy Joe Bob character was quite welcome but also felt a little too defensive at times.

Advertisement

But the main draw of the evening was our venerable host sitting down with David Gordon Green, director of Halloween (2018), and the upcoming Halloween Kills. Green was a great guest for the show, showing his chops when it came to discussing the film. One of the more interesting discussions was on the state of horror, particularly in the streaming world, and what was ahead for David Gordon Green, including an upcoming Hellraiser show.

Final Thoughts on Angel (1983)

Angel was surprisingly good. This was my first time seeing it and I was floored by how complex of a film it was. While I am not sure how well it worked as a Halloween film for a Halloween special, it is definitely a portrait of drive-in excellence. It seems that the series it spawned, of four films, is a case of diminishing returns, but the first movie was so good I wouldn’t mind seeing what happens to Molly going forward. I also didn’t mention this much, but the more progressive streak in the film also proved interesting and worthy of future exploration. 5 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Best Line: “Well, we better get over there before she ends up in the tomb for the unknown hooker.” – Mae

The Last Drive-In Halloween Hoedown screencap of Angel (1983)
Molly’s got a gun!

Terror Train (1980)

The more traditionally “Halloween” film of the night was Roger Spottiswoode’s Terror Train – though that is more in spirit than setting as this movie takes place on New Year’s Eve. The film follows a group of pre-med students after a tragic prank three years prior as they board a train for a New Year’s Eve party. Unbeknownst to the partygoers, the consequences of their actions are fast approaching in the form of a mysterious, masked killer.

The film, early enough into the formation of key slasher tropes, is novel enough. It isn’t as meticulously approached as John Carpenter’s Halloween, nor as satirical as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, not as groundbreaking as Bob Clark’s Black Christmas. However, it is still a very solid slasher with some fun spins on what would become hallmarks of the genre. It also helps that the solid direction of the film by Roger Spottiswoode makes use of the claustrophobic setting quite well. How can a killer move so unimpeded in a commuter train? Spottiswoode does a good job at making the space itself a threat.

Advertisement
The Last Drive-In Halloween Hoedown poster for Terror Train (1980)
This train ride is no laughing matter.

Rounding out the production side of the film, the screenplay was crafted by T. Y. Drake and the overall producer was Harold Greenberg. The movie is a great example of that “Canadian Funny Money” period Joe Bob Briggs has mentioned before – where productions were given heavy tax rebates for shooting in Canada. Terror Train was specially filmed in Montreal during the coldest months of the year, and just after Prom Night had wrapped. It is an independent film, but found a distributor in 20th Century Fox.

As for the performances, the film features Jamie Lee Curtis as Alana Maxwell, who represents the final girl trope quite elegantly. The film also features veteran actor and rodeo cowboy Ben Johnson as Carne, the train’s conductor. Rounding out the cast, are Hart Bochner as “Doc,” Timothy Webber as “Mo,” Sandee Currie, Vanity (yes, that Vanity), and drag artist Derek MacKinnon. Also, for some reason, David Copperfield is in the movie – yes, the magician.

Jamie Lee Curtis is pretty understated here. She doesn’t have quite the type of leading lady role she did in Halloween and Prom Night and the character succeeds as likable through the sheer force of her charisma alone. Derek MacKinnon is interesting, though largely relegated to being disguised. Despite this, MacKinnon chews the scenery pretty well, particularly given the surprising reveal at the climax as to who the killer is. The best performance of the film is from Ben Johnson, but he plays a sort of stock character in over his head and trying to solve a mystery far above his paygrade, but goddamn does he give it his all. Also, David Copperfield does some magic tricks that just feel fake because we’re seeing them in a film. That is why you only see magicians do their craft in person.

Technically speaking, the movie is quite effective and doesn’t feel like a quick cash-in that some might assume. The cinematography of John Alcott is particularly effective given the relatively small spaces on the train. It also helps the effects team were able to make the train seem mobile when it was parked for the entire shoot. If Alcott sounds familiar it is because he was Stanley Kubrick’s most trusted cinematographer, working with him on 2001: A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, Barry Lyndon, and The Shining. He won an Oscar for Barry Lyndon. One of Alcott’s innovations on the set was to rewire the lighting on the train and use dimmers outside of the train cars to help simulate the movement of a train.

Anne Henderson’s editing is great, giving the film enough angles per scene to give viewers a sense of space. As for the score, I didn’t find the film to have a particularly memorable soundscape. The music is just sort of there.

Joe Bob-servations

Naturally, there was a lot to say on Terror Train, a true slashic, but it seemed the real draw for the night was getting to hear Jason Blum, David Gordon Green, and Joe Bob Briggs talk all things horror, past and present. While Jason Blum’s energy felt a bit too “producer” at times, especially compared to Green and Briggs, his presence was quite insightful. Especially because he is perhaps one of the biggest names in horror production in history, let alone now. It was interesting to hear the trio talk about how movies come about and how modern-day creative partnerships work, and it was also rather reassuring. You get the sense that Blum understands the influence and precariousness of his company and he is quite keen to foster and empower relationships with creators, with Green seeming particularly close. It’s rather pleasant to see.

Advertisement

There was, of course, plenty of talk on Terror Train and classic horror. Particularly fun was the revelation that David Gordon Green’s Frankenhooker t-shirt came from Joe Bob Briggs himself. Green was a fan and sent in for it. An interesting discussion revolved around Green’s education at the University of North Carolina School of the Arts – a smaller school that has provided some great alternative voices in the film industry.

Final Thoughts on Terror Train (1980)

Terror Train is most certainly a classic slasher for a reason. it came out early enough to where the novelty of putting a masked killer in a different scenario or set-up didn’t feel like as big a shortcut as it does now, it had in-her-prime scream queen Jamie Lee Curtis, and did something very interesting with the killer swapping costumes from kill to kill, servicing as a codifier of that trend early on. The film was also fairly progressive in casting a drag performer, Derek MacKinnon, as the killer without necessarily commentating or making a value judgment on drag. It is not the drag that is the problem here, it’s the killing! 4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Best Line: Alana Maxwell: “No. Kenny, you’re better than he is. I’m sure you’re better than he is.”

Kenny Hampson: “I am. He didn’t know how to cut a woman into pieces.”

The Last Drive-In Halloween Hoedown screencap from Terror Train (1980)
Peek-a-boo!

Haunted MTL Drive-In Totals

As always, let’s take a look at the official Drive-In Totals:

As for our totals:

Advertisement
  • 0 Yuki (rectify this next time, Shudder)
  • 2 Street Dads
  • 2 Time Horror Hottie
  • 2 Guests
  • 3 1/2 Minutes of film to shoot with
  • Gratuitous Halloween discussion without showing Halloween
  • Gratuitous 70s Stage Magic
  • Gratuituous Samhain History Lecture
  • Gratuitous dissection of the term “microbudget”
  • Suprise Drag Night
  • Pumpkin Censoring
  • Halloween Joking
  • Abrubt Ending Fu
  • Half-assed Costume Fu
  • Joe Bob Fan Club T-Shirt Fu
  • Slumber Party Horror Movie Fu
  • Krishna Assault Fu
  • No Silver Bolo Award!
  • Cosplay: Taco Joe Bob, Caultiflower Pizza Darcy, Angel/Molly Darcy
The Last Drive-In Halloween Hoedown screenshot of Jason Blum and David Gordon Green
Blum and Green are game to chat with Briggs.

Episode Score

As a whole, the evening was fun but also felt unusually loose in concept compared to other specials. If it weren’t for a couple of the Halloween accouterments and a visit from some of the team behind the upcoming Halloween Kills, you’d be able to mistake this for a general night at the Drive-In. With that being said, an general night on the Drive-In is perfectly fine and if this were a midseason episode it would be great.

So no, Joe Bob, you didn’t “ruin Halloween again,” nor have you ever, but as entertaining as this was there is an expectation of something a little more thematically appropriate. One cannot necessarily fault the fans for thinking so – especially given the guests. All in all, a fun episode with a great double feature – but as far as a Halloween show goes, a little too far outside the margins. 4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

I hope you enjoyed this recap and review of Shudder’s The Last Drive-In with Joe Bob Briggs. We don’t have a date for the return of the show for a full season, but we do know some more specials are on the way. Naturally, we are going to cover them as they release.

In the meantime, please share your thoughts with us about the show, the review, or the movies from the special. We’re dying to hear from you.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Book Reviews

The Dead Take the A Train Review: Queer Magic and Monster Mayhem

Published

on

“Julie crawled onto the table, straddling her intern, both hands around the knife. She torqued it downward, cursing. Brad shrieked harder.” -pg 57, The Dead Take the A Train by Cassandra Khaw & Richard Kadrey

The Dead Take the A Train is the first book in a duology by authors Cassandra Khaw and Richard Kadrey. It was published in 2023 by Tor Nightfire (like the Scourge Between Stars, which I reviewed here). I was not previously familiar with Kadrey’s work, which most notably includes the Sandman Slim series. However, I was introduced to Khaw through The Salt Grows Heavy (review here), which I absolutely adored in all its twisted, gory glory. Therefore, I was thrilled to pick-up The Dead Take the A Train, which promised similar heart in a modern cosmic horror package.

In The Dead Take the A Train, a magical fixer named Julie must hunt down eldritch monstrosities threatening the lives of those around her. To do this, she has to go up against her shitty ex, a questionable angel, finance executives, and her own sobriety. When an old friend shows up, Julie is terrified to find herself making a retirement plan that doesn’t involve getting murdered by a demon.

The Dead Take the A Train is reminiscent of N.K. Jeminsin’s The City We Became, with both featuring queer characters tackling eldritch horror plots in New York City. In the same way, the novel was reminiscent of a gorier version of Dimension 20’s Unsleeping City actual play series. However, it clearly carves out a space for itself among the droves of cosmic-horror inspired love letters to New York City. For one, it is mostly unconcerned with borough beef, which (not to sound like a curmudgeonly Midwesterner), is so refreshing. The book also has a relatively novel way the world works, which helps it stay memorable.

Advertisement

Overall, I really liked The Dead Take the A Train. First off, the characters are fun and easy to root for. Julie is a mess in pretty much every aspect, but her bad decisions are understandable and she is charismatic. Her romance with her friend, Sarah, also serves to make Julie more likable. It helps that the villains are so easy to hate too. What’s not to hate about rich Wall Street assholes engaging in human sacrifice? Speaking of which, I liked the juxtaposition of corporate Wall Street and cosmic cultists. The actions taken were evil, but more importantly, they were just business.

The prose was flowery, but not quite as much as in The Salt Grows Heavy. So, if you struggled with Khaw’s other works for that reason this may be a much easier read. Personally, I enjoyed the prose in both. There is quite a bit of gore in The Dead Take the A Train, but I didn’t find it to be overwhelming. I think you could still enjoy the book if you don’t love gore, though maybe not if you have a weak stomach.

One of the largest issues I have with The Dead Take the A Train, is the lack of clarity in power levels of the various characters. Especially since all their forms of magic work in different ways, it is sometimes unclear the level of danger present. This can also sometimes create room for plot holes. For example, Julie has a friend who is tapped into anything and everything happening online. This is an absurdly powerful ability (and is used as such). But there were moments where the main conflict probably could have been avoided or solved using that power. It also felt odd that no one else in this thriving magic community felt strongly about stopping a world-ending catastrophe. Because of this, the magic underground of NYC could feel smaller than I think was intended.

Having been familiar with Khaw’s work previously, The Dead Take the A Train clearly feels like a mix of Khaw’s style with someone else’s. This could be a boon or a hindrance, depending on your view of Khaw’s distinct prose and storytelling. Either way, if you are interested in learning more about the process or the authors, check out the interview they did for SFF Addicts Podcast!

Cassandra Khaw and Richard Kadrey on the SFF Addicts Podcast

I recommend The Dead Take the A Train, especially for those who are fans of modern urban eldritch horror. The book is an even bigger steal if you are looking for danger, gore, and queer characters. Check it out! And keep your eyes peeled for the next book in this duology. 

Advertisement

[USR 4.2]

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Dolores Roach, A Fillet of Left Cheek

Published

on

The second season of Dolores Roach started with a bang. The first episode was dark, gristly and in a strange way whimsical. It certainly brought to light new elements of the character.

The story

We begin our story with Dolores somewhere, talking to someone. I’d like to be more specific, but that’s all we know right now.

She tells this unknown person about her flight from Empanadas Loco. How Jeremiah killed Luis. How she, whether she meant to or not, killed Jeremiah. How she then set the building on fire by blowing up the fryer in the kitchen.

Advertisement

Scared and alone, Dolores then ran for the underground. Dragging her purple massage table she runs into a hole in a subway track and finds herself in a whole different world.

Almost at once, she finds a place where someone is living. There’s a hot plate, a kettle and several packets of ramen. Even better, everything has Jeremiah’s name on it, literally written on it. Exhausted and alone, Dolores makes herself a cup of ramen and goes to sleep on her massage table.

She’s woken sometime later by a small man named Donald. He knows her because he knew Jeremiah. Dolores proceeds to tell him an abridged version of events that led up to Jeremiah’s death. And by abridged, I mean she blamed Luis for everything, throwing him under the bus so hard I’m surprised she didn’t pull something.

Donald seems inclined to help Dolores. He tells her that if anyone messes with her she should go further down, down a stairwell that he points out for her.

Dolores thanks him, then tries to go back to sleep. She’s soon woken again by a young woman collecting Jeremiah’s things.

Advertisement

While Dolores has an issue with this, she’s willing to let it go. Until that is, this woman tries to take her table. Then, Dolores does what she does best. Because one thing is for sure. Dolores is going to take care of herself.

What worked

One thing I love about this series so far is that our main character, Dolores, is crazy. And hearing her rationalize her crazy is both terrifying and fascinating. I hate/love how sweet and soothing she can be. Even with the rat that she killed in this episode. She cooed at it, encouraging it to come to her, even calling it a subway raccoon.

Then she killed it and started crying.

I also love the underground community. It’s both horrific and whimsical. It reminds me of Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere, which is full of worlds most people don’t see but are all around us. It’s also horrific because there are so many people that our society has failed, that they’ve gathered underground and made their own little society. That’s not great. There just shouldn’t be that many people who need homes.

Advertisement

What didn’t work

Unfortunately, this episode did have two major flaws. And the first one is a personal pet peeve of mine.

In the last episode of season one, certain things were established. Dolores said she was carefully rationing her weed. She said she didn’t have anything to eat since coming down to the tunnels. She still had her massage table. This episode rewrote a lot of that.

Frankly, I hate when stories do that. It may or not make a difference to the story. It just strikes me as poor planning and lazy writing. This show has proven it’s capable of doing better.

All things considered, I thought this was a great start to the season. I’m invested in the story, curious about the new characters, and worried about the well-being of everyone Dolores comes in contact with. And that’s all as it should be.

Advertisement
3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

By the way, if you like my writing, you might want to check out my latest sci-fi horror story, Nova. It’ll be released episodically on my site, Paper Beats World, starting February 5th.

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

The Golem (2019), a Film Review

The Golem (2019) is a folk horror film directed by Doron and Yoav Paz, starring Hani Furstenberg and Ishai Golan.

Published

on

The Golem (2019) is a folk horror film directed by Doron and Yoav Paz. The cast includes Hani Furstenberg, Ishai Golan, Kirill Cernyakov, and Brynie Furstenberg. As of this review, the film remains available to Amazon Prime and fuboTV subscribers with additional purchase options on other platforms.

Set in 1673, a small Jewish community faces hardships from others as the Black Plague spreads. When these hardships reach a boiling point, Hanna takes matters into her own hands. Having secretly learned to read, she seeks to perform a ritual that would create a protector for her people. Yet, this act brings about a steep cost.

a redheaded woman walks through a village.
Hani Furstenberg as Hanna

What I Like about The Golem

The film received three nominations in 2019. These nominations include Best Actress, Best Sound, and Best Cinematography from the Award of the Israeli Film Academy. While The Golem wouldn’t win these awards, the nominations indicate a strong film.

I won’t claim to know the accuracy and intricacies of the golem in relation to its religious origin, but the film certainly brings to life its concept. The effort to create such a creature and the toll it takes from the summoner create an emotional throughline for viewers to follow.

Hani Furstenberg’s Hanna and Ishai Golan’s Benjamin bring a complicated but realistic relationship to the film. Viewers see the love between them, even as their own society attempts to cast them from each other. They feel like a couple who understand the other’s wants and needs. However, we begin to witness the decaying of this relationship.

Advertisement

Hanna, specifically, provides a complex character that incentivizes the viewers to root for and against her at different points in the movie. Though she navigates blatant sexism and discrimination, she remains far from flawless. These flaws and ambitions establish Hanna as an interesting character.

The Golem can be brutal. This film provides a period-accurate look into antisemitism and systemic oppression, which certainly evokes a different form of horror. However, the golem itself brings brutality through its smiting.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

As the film deals directly with systemic issues of 1673, understand that antisemitism, sexism, and hate crimes remain important elements within the film.

An assault leads to a miscarriage, which seems a point worth mentioning for potential viewers who are sensitive to such points. Fertility and bodily autonomy, generally, also play roles within the provided film.

If any of these are potential issues for your viewing experience, perhaps skip The Golem.

An obscured woman looks at a boy covered in mud. The setting is a forest.
The Golem takes Shape

What I Dislike about The Golem

Aleksey Tritenko delivers a wonderful performance for an interesting antagonist, but the role of Vladimir serves limited purposes. In many ways, he’s the representation of his societal antisemitism. While this remains perfectly valid, he somewhat disappears from the narrative until he becomes relevant. His marauders should be an oppressive threat within the society, looming over it with malice.

I can’t deny the lack of intimidation the golem’s aesthetic brings. While some films evoke an eeriness through silent children to horrific effect, this didn’t sit well with me. It should be eerie, but something was missing in execution.

Advertisement

The Golem focuses on a more human horror than the supernatural elements might suggest. While not a direct critique, prepare your viewing expectations accordingly. The Golem remains a folk horror film, using the folk story to represent human evil and flaws. It won’t particularly haunt you with the gore.

Final Thoughts

The Golem brings the old legend of the golem folk story to life. If you thirst for a human horror that shines a light on the flaws of the people within, The Golem might satisfy you. However, it’s not a particularly frightening film, choosing instead to tell a story of loss and overcoming suffering. 3 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending