Connect with us

Published

on

Aaron Keeling’s The House on Pine Street is about a pregnant woman named Jennifer (Emily Goss) who thinks her temporary home might be haunted. The problem is, she’s only staying at the place because she recently went through a mental breakdown of sorts. Adding to our sense of mystery, we have limited knowledge of what that breakdown entailed. As her life goes from bad to worse, we’ll probably hope that Jennifer finally begins to find some peace and hope for a happier future. However, what seemed to be new hope of happiness turns into an indescribable nightmare.

This is, in many ways, a suspense movie. Although it’s a haunted house movie, we’re never quite sure where it will go next. Will the hauntings (or her imaginings) remain subtle or grow increasingly violent? Will these real-or-imagine spirits be mere pranksters or will Jennifer’s unborn baby be turned to ash from a three-alarm fire? You don’t quite know. Basically, I knew this was a good movie because it had me wondering if Jennifer would be forced to watch her young family burn. It had me imagining freaky scenarios independent of the actual scenes. Jennifer fights for her life and a chance at a new life, but it increasingly seems impossible.

Family Dynamics

I’m guilty of overusing the word “dynamics” as a writer. However, it so often rightfully applies. Here the dynamics obviously involve family and psychological disturbance, blending with possible paranormal hocus pocus. The House on Pine Street also carries that dread of family dysfunction. At a time when Jennifer should be overcoming all obstacles, she awkwardly reunites with her mother, Meredith (Cathy Barnett). feeling forced to do so and resenting Meredith for it.

There is obviously some sadness here, as no healthy person wants to dislike their parent — someone responsible for their very entry into the world. The discomfort carries over into a social gathering where, possibly, a man named Walter (Jim Korinke) invigorates Jennifer’s interest in the supernatural presence in her temporary home. Might the hauntings just be her imagination, brought on by delusions triigered by a roomful of family and friends? At first, Jennifer calmly and emphatically tells her husband (Taylor Bottles) of her suspicions, but it ends up getting more frantic as her fears intensify. So, while we don’t fully know her origins, her history, her hopes and her dreams, it could potentialy bring tears to the eyes of sensitiveviewers. We only get glimpses of her life, her childhood, her formative experiences, etc. However, we know she fears there will be an upcoming funeral.

Advertisement

More Reasons You Should Appreciate ‘The House on Pine Street’

I don’t wish to sound overly-excited about this or any movie, but what can I say? This is a haunted house movie done right. In fact, this might be one of the greats, as other critics have hinted at. So am I just trying to fit in with them, to maybe hobnob with better-established reviewers than myself? I assure you, I am not. This is a small, perhaps rare example of my actually agreeing with many snooty critics out there (that and The Blair Witch Project, which I side with supportive critics on).

Anyway, like any decent haunted house movie, this one makes us examine the everyday, the inane. You’ll find some of the most gruesome and unnerving objects in her house are not conventional murder weapons, but anything that could conceivably be moved or manipulated. Also, Jennifer must face her own fears to discover the identity of the mysterious force menacing her. Then again, what if it’s all in her own head?

Final Thoughts

This movie is better than plenty of franchise favorites, honestly. I mean, Hellraiser: Bloodline? Bah! Pinhead in space isn’t scary! A movie is much scarier if it makes you examine the space in your own head. This movie is definitely good if, on occasion, you want spooky elements but not any blood-sucking vampires, flesh-eating zombies, mask-wearing maniacs, or mists full of extravagant critters. Writers Keeling and Natalie Jones gave us a movie to remember, collecting a decent amount of accolades from critics. If they collaborate again, it should work. So far, so good.

Although this movie isn’t in the “found footage” genre, it somehow conveys a sense that you’ve stumbled across a hidden tape recording from Jennifer that explains all of her doubts about her existence. Even as the possibility of an invisible “spook” looms, you sense that she might be slipping with or without their presence. There’s every sense that a character can be gravely harmed, including any part of her family, and you’ll isntantly understand why her estranged mother is so disliked by her. Jennifer wants a silver lining and for hope to be renewed, but can it be? The idea that a semi-private conversation coukld’ve triggered her problem is interesting, too. That it might have become an obsession paints Jennifer as someone with a troubled inner voice. This movie is a stomach-churning package (in the good sense), and is compellingly claustrophobic.

What are your thoughts on The House on Pine Street? Let us know in the comments!

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

Low point or a daring experiment? Halloween VI (1995) Review

Published

on

To a lot of fans, this is the film that killed the franchise. It says a lot that the next installment is yet another retcon. Halloween VI: The Curse of Michael Myers attempts to explain Michael’s unrelenting evil, which lead to mixed opinions from longtime fans. There are two cuts of the film, theatrical vs producer’s. For a lot of people, the latter is the only one worth mentioning. Aiming to be as accurate as possible, I will be talking about the producer’s cut. Let’s begin! 

Plot

We start Halloween VI with a six-year time jump from part five. Jamie is now barefoot and recently pregnant, running away from Michael as he wants her baby. While she manages to hide the little one away, Michael finally gets his hunger satiated by killing her. The moment is one of the most brutal ways in the franchise up until that point. Rest in peace, Jamie, you held your ground for as long as you could, the sequels were just too relentless. 

The movie then cuts to a whole different scene going on. We have a new family living in the Myers house and their youngest child is hearing voices telling him to kill his loved ones. Tommy Lloyd is watching the family, played by none other than Paul Rudd in his first-ever theatrical role. Tommy still carries trauma from the events all those years ago when Laurie Strode was babysitting him. So when he finds Jamie’s baby, his part in the story becomes even more essential. 

Advertisement

Dr Loomis also stars in what was Donald Pleasance’s final role before his passing. He and Tommy try to stop Michael once and for all before the cycle can repeat itself. As it turns out, Michael is a victim of a druid cult which makes him want to kill his family members every Halloween. Thorn, the cult in question, thinks they can control Michael and make him do their bidding. This results in catastrophe and Michael goes berzerk and kills all the cult members. Once again, it’s one of the most gruesome montages for the franchise up until that point.  

Tommy and Kara are left to face Michael on their own which they manage to do with some corrosive liquid and good luck. However, nothing stays dead in this franchise as it’s soon revealed Michael somehow escaped and this time Dr Loomis might not be so lucky… 

Overall thoughts

I would say for me personally Halloween VI definitely ranks somewhere near the bottom. The whole point of Michael is that there is no rhyme or reason to his killings and this film tries to go against that. I am glad the mistake was rectified by the upcoming installment. There were still some good things about it, such as Paul Rudd’s acting that reveals some raw talent as far as I’m concerned, as well as some direction choices and musical score. However, I also think it absolutely deserves all the criticism that it gets. 

Advertisement
2.5 out of 5 stars (2.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

American Horror Stories, The Thing Under The Bed

Published

on

We’ve reached the final episode of American Horror Stories, season three. After the ups and downs of the season, I didn’t know what to expect. I felt that we were due a big finish, Killer Queens. But I feared we were in for a big letdown.

As it turns out, The Thing Under The Bed was neither.

The story

We begin our story with a little girl named Mary, who is scared of something under her bed. She sneaks out of her room, only to be caught by her father and sent back to sleep. And of course, there is something horrible waiting for her under her bed.

Debby Ryan in American Horror Stories.

This scene cuts away to a woman named Jillian. She has strange dreams, including one about Mary. But her husband, Mark, doesn’t want to hear about it. He’s only interested in a little lovemaking because he wants a baby. Jillian doesn’t, which makes total sense because she’s already married to one. But her irritation with her childish husband goes away when he goes away. And by goes away, I mean he’s sloppily devoured by something vicious under their bed.

Advertisement

What worked

In short, this episode just worked. The acting was professional and believable. The cinematography and lighting work were wonderful, adding spooky effects and startling moments without impairing visibility.

Best of all, the story was solid. There were no plotholes to be found. Our main character, Jillian, was relatable and sympathetic.

This was maybe my favorite part of the story. I thought Jillian was a remarkably sympathetic character. She was dealt a hand she never asked for, having her husband slaughtered in their bedroom. I don’t think she missed him, so much as she was afraid of the legal ramifications of being caught with literal blood on her hands.

Then, when it would have been safest for her to just lay low and save up for a good defense attorney, she instead goes into unlikely hero mode. She does her best to save people, putting herself in legal and physical danger. It’s hard not to root for her.

It’s also a little hard not to root for the antagonist, too. I don’t want to ruin the twist for you, so I’m going to tread lightly here. But it’s great when you have an antagonist who might be off their rocker, but also maybe has a point.

Advertisement

What didn’t work

I can only really think of one complaint with this episode. And that is how frequently one character says the word Chickadee. And if you’ve seen the episode, you know what I am talking about.

I get it, he has a pet name for his daughter. It’s adorable. It’s meant to convey that the two of them have a healthy loving relationship and I get it. We all get it. Blind monks get it. But the fact remains that no parent on Earth calls their kid by their pet name every single time they speak an individual sentence to them. It was just too damn much.

All in all, this was a good episode. It was a classic story, turned on its head, told by professionals from start to finish. And I hope that if there is another season, we see more stories like this one. But after the efforts put into this season at large, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the last we see of American Horror Stories.

4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies n TV

American Horror Stories, Leprechaun

Published

on

If you’ve watched enough short-form horror anthology shows, you’ll notice that some stories are mainstays. Each show seems to put on the same sort of episodes, with the occasional surprising storyline that we’ve never (or at least rarely) seen before.

Leprechaun was an example of a repeated story—the story of a greedy thief whose punishment far outweighs the crime.

The story

We begin our story in 1841, with a drunk man leaving the bar one late night. He’s distracted by something glowing at the end of the well. When he reaches down for the glowing thing, he falls in. Moments later, he screams.

We then cut to the modern day. The well is still there, and now it’s surrounded by a dying town. In this town lives a young man named Colin. He’s married, his wife is pregnant, and he’s out of work. Like many of his friends.

Advertisement
Hudson Oz in American Horror Stories Leprechaun.

Desperate for cash, Colin and his friends decide to rob a bank. They put together an Equate version of Ocean’s Eleven, and break in one night. But, of course, they find that the gold is nothing more than bait. And the creature waiting for them is something they never expected.

What worked

The first thing I want to point out is how real this episode felt. At least to anyone currently living in the same small town they grew up in. These characters felt like guys I went to school with. Guys I would see at the bar.

I appreciated the real anger and frustration these characters are feeling. Especially Colin. He’s bitter, and maybe he has a right to be. He did exactly what he was supposed to do to succeed. He went to school and invested in his career, and yet now he’s out of work and struggling to support his family. I probably don’t need to tell you how that feels. Because of this, we can all kind of understand why he was tempted to rob a bank.

I also want to talk about the fact that this was, as I said, an often-explored story. That can be a bad thing, but it can also be a good thing. This story is told over and over because it’s a good story. A relatable story. And there’s nothing wrong with that.

What didn’t work

That being said, this version didn’t try to do much to break out of the mold.

Because we have seen this story so many times, most of us could tell the story themselves. I would have expected something new, or some twist. But, in the end, the story didn’t bring anything new to the discussion.

Advertisement

Maybe because of this, the ending left a lot to be desired. Trapped in the basement of the bank, everyone just sort of stares at everyone else, until the thieves give up. And that’s it. The ending wasn’t scary, shocking, or funny. It was just sad, on multiple levels.

Overall, this was an okay story. It was entertaining, if not surprising. I would compare this episode to homemade macaroni and cheese. Everyone’s got their own version, they’re all pretty good, and none of them are exciting.

There’s just one episode left in this season of American Horror Stories. Let’s hope they’ve saved the best for last.

3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending