We did it, Mutants! The Last Drive-In has been renewed by Shudder for a second season! Plus, we survived a bunch of crazy, creepy movies in this first season. Good job everyone.
Tonight’s theme seems to be “one for Joe Bob” and “one for Darcy.” You’ll see why.
It is strange that the only film Tiny Tim ever starred in is a low-budget slasher film. He was a figure in popular culture who you would assume would have been more present in the movies. Blood Harvest is a 1987 slasher film that follows a young woman who is back home from college. She discovers things are amiss at home and finds herself stalked by a pair of siblings. Meanwhile, her friends are also being picked off by a mysterious killer – oh – and one of the brothers is dressed like a clown.
Directed by Bill Rebane and written by Frank Kinnikin, Blood Harvest stars Tiny Tim as “The Marvelous Mervo,” Itonia Salchek, and Peter Krause.
Review
Joe Bob Briggs was particularly enthused by Blood Harvest. He tried on his previous shows to expand the audience and notoriety of the film to mixed results. With The Last Drive-In, Joe Bob was quite generous with the score of the film, awarding it three stars. The movie is certainly distinct among the films we’ve seen over the course of the season; mostly because of the novelty of Tiny Tim. The singer infused the entirety of Joe Bob’s host segments and led to some incredible moments.
The show featured two guests in Justin Martell and Bucks Burnette. Martell was on to promote his biography of Tiny Tim. He was kind enough to show Joe Bob video footage of Tiny Tim watching Joe Bob talking about Blood Harvest back in the 1990s. It was an incredibly sweet moment and definitely a highlight for the season. Burnette, Tiny Tim’s manager towards the end of his life, also shared a great many insights about the performer.
While Blood Harvest is not a great film, but we here at Haunted MTL appreciate how earnest it is. Of course there is the novelty of Tiny Tim who, naturally, sings several songs. The Haunted MTL rating of the film is two and a half stars. One problem is that the film has an incredibly small cast and is very much set in a single location. Ultimately this makes it feels like a very small-scale project. There is also the issue of Tiny Tim himself. Obviously a fantastic performer, he feels disconnected overall from what else is going on in the movie. This makes a lot of a sense, though, as he did not share the “stage” well, reportedly. Many of his scenes have him in isolation from the other characters.
This is no tiptoe through the tulips at all!
Best Line: “How about some meaningless sex?”
Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II (1987)
Opening Rant: Joe Bob has zero tolerance for zero tolerance.
We’re in Darcy’s ballpark with the final film of the season. Hello Mary Lou: Prom Night II is a 1987 Canadian horror film that is only considered a sequel to the original Prom Night through marketing. Whereas the first Prom Night was a slasher film with no supernatural angle, Hello Mary Lou is the story of a high school that is tormented by the possession of a teenager by the ghost of a former student from the 1950s named Mary Lou. The titular ghost takes control of a student and proceeds to seduce and murder her way through archetypal teenagers and adults alike.
Directed by Bruce Pittman, Hello Mary Lou stars Michael Ironside, Wendy Lyon, Louis Ferreira, and Lisa Schrage.
Review
Joe Bob was particularly generous with Hello Mary Lou. It is a solid film, but given Darcy’s love of it, Joe Bob awarded it four stars. While the host segments did provide a great deal of information about the origins of the film and the talents behind it, the little subplot about The Last Drive-In prom was a season highlight. Of the factoids, what was most substantial was the revelation of the film originally being titled The Haunting of Hamilton High and the fact that many of the characters were given surnames referencing key horror directors.
The real highlight of the episode, and the finale of the show revolved around a special prom for Darcy. Darcy, of course, was dressed up in a prom gown as Mary Lou, and Joe Bob looked dapper as hell in a shiny black and silver coat. The show finished with John Brennan and Bigfeet performing and the rest of the crew coming out to dance and share in the prom fun. It was a touching and hilarious moment.
Hello Mary Lou is a very good supernatural slasher film with some impressive kills, effects, and a surprisingly amount of full frontal nudity. It is honestly the perfect sort of movie for The Last Drive-In and is a four star film. The performances in the movie are also pretty impressive, especially Wendy Lion as both Vicki and Mary Lou’s possessed form who is able to channel oversexed menace quite effectively. Some of the special effects are quite fascinating, such as a liquid chalkboard and maybe the creepiest rocking-horse ever put on film. Also, there is a kill involving a locker that might be an all-time-best in the season. It’s that good.
Believe it or not, chekov’s gun does not apply here
Best Line: ” I can’t believe this. I’m 18, I’m stunningly good looking, prom’s like a week away, and I don’t have a date. “
Haunted MTL Drive-In Totals
1 Ancient Artifact (hello VHS tape!)
6 seconds of a stunt-woman being on fire
9 horror director references in character names
10 Twitter Bans for Darcy
22,000 dollars to license the rights to the song “Hello Mary Lou”
Brick Fu
Foreclosure Fu
Volleyball Fu
Trapper-Keeper Fu
Human Pinatas
Double Dose of Chloroform
Gratuitous Layers of Reality
Forcible Clown Ejection
Gratuitous Leg Lotioning
Blood Harvesting
Scottish Joking
Prom Pranking with Fiery Death
Locker Squishing
Chest Bursting
Well, with that we wrap up the first season of recaps for The Last Drive-In with Joe Bob Briggs. Before we go, I just wanted to share what a pleasure this season has been for me as a fan of horror. I also wanted to share how wonderful the experience of writing these recaps has been for me.
As always, please share your thoughts with us about The Last Drive-In. Also, please check out our other great content here at Haunted MTL.
Anna (2013), also known as Mindscape, is a psychological thriller directed by Jorge Dorado. This R-rated directorial debut stars Mark Strong, Taissa Farmiga, Brian Cox, Saskia Reeves, Richard Dillane, and Indira Varma. As of this review, interested viewers can watch this film on VUDU, Hoopla, Plex Channel, Pluto TV, Roku Channel, Tubi TV, Amazon Prime, and more. Anna originally released in 2013, but it released in the US in 2014.
Struggling to return to his work as a memory detective, John (Mark Strong) pursues a new assignment. Anna (Taissa Farmiga) views John as her last chance to prove her innocence before she’s condemned to an asylum. As John searches through her memories, a tale of abuse and manipulation unravels.
Mindscape Cover of Anna (2013)
What I Like about Anna (2013)
Anna earned three nominations but no award recognition. From the Sitges–Catalonian International Film Festival, it earned a nomination for Best Motion Picture. The Goya Awards recognized Jorge Dorado with the 2014 nomination for Best New Director. Finally, Anna received a nomination from the Gaudí Awards for Best Art Direction.
Taissa Farmiga’s performance balances the line between suspicious and innocent, which is necessary for this unraveling mystery. It’s a delicate role, but Taissa Farmiga brings to life the material given.
Acclaimed filmmaker Christopher Nolan directs an international cast in “Inception,” an original sci-fi actioner that travels around the globe and into the intimate and infinite world of dreams
Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a skilled thief, the best in the dangerous art of extraction: stealing valuable secrets from deep within the subconscious during the dream state when the mind is at its most vulnerable
Cobb’s rare ability has made him a coveted player in this treacherous new world of corporate espionage, but it has also made him an international fugitive and cost him everything he has ever loved
Last update on 2025-02-22 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
Anna‘s plot rotates around a new fringe science that’s slowly gaining traction. It’s less a dissection of this science and more a norm that Anna expects viewers to believe. It’s an interesting concept, though not unique. Still, it’s a nice additional dynamic to the mystery.
While not a horrifying film, it does deliver a mystery that keeps viewers engaged with enough hooks to add an extra layer before something gets stale. That mystery does linger in the mind in some respects but doesn’t haunt the viewer.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design
Tired Tropes and Triggers
Despite Anna not depicting these moments, sexual assault remains a recurring element of the film. Little remains conclusive, with some suggestions that these are false allegations. Furthering this point, the film depicts Anna as a manipulator and flirt when some incidents suggest she’s a survivor of assault.
Derogatory language might upset some, but these remain brief moments. The use indicates a particular character’s immaturity, but I’ll raise the point regardless. Furthering this line of analysis is a moment where a bullied character is implied to be gay, but it’s likely just an insult.
While not inherently a trigger, this new field of science earns the claim of being somewhere between forensic science and lie detector tests, a massive gap that anything can fit in. It makes everything subjective when the film wants to claim absolute evidence. I can’t help but wonder what exploring that unreliability might look like, but that’s not this film.
Mark Strong as John
What I Dislike about Anna (2013)
The biggest deal breaker for some is this concept of a teen mastermind. I won’t go into details about the mystery, but I am often fatigued with this idea of a teen femme fatale. While Anna gives enough mystery, it’s an overused trope.
Mark Strong’s performance delivers on the material, but John seems so easily manipulated for someone who does this as a profession. While out of practice, I don’t understand why he believes or doesn’t believe information. If Anna depicts John as overly critical or gullible, the film will have a more consistent character.
I assume there remains an understandable reason for the name change, but Anna appears as a common title for a film, spinning a series of some recognition. Mindscape also earns some recognition and competition, but it’s a more memorable title than a single noun name.
Final Thoughts
Anna provides an interesting concept and mystery, but many shortcomings hinder the execution. Viewers eager for a psychological mystery with a drop of sci-fi, Anna delivers an engaging story. However, the market does provide competition, making it a tough film to recommend. (3 / 5)
“The Demon of Parenthood” is the eighth episode of season 3 of Evil, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.
The assessors investigate cursed toys in a terrible attack against commerce, but Ben (Aasif Mandvi) has a finger on the potential issue. David (Mike Colter) receives another task from the Entity. Kristen (Katja Herbers) learns more about her missing egg. Leland (Michael Emerson) invites Dr Boggs (Kurt Fuller) to the darker side of spirituality. Sheryl (Christine Lahti) takes her granddaughter to work.
Evil Season 3 Cover
What I Like about “The Demon of Parenthood”
I enjoy the espionage aspect of the Entity, pushing David to questionable grounds as he navigates what’s right against what’s demanded of him. While this plotline doesn’t reach its full potential, this episode highlights one of the more interesting opportunities of this idea. The Entity consistently interferes with the procedural case, possibly covering up abuse to support its objectives. This episode highlights this dynamic to perfection.
Kristen gets pulled in multiple directions, forced to question her trust in David, and faces a unique horror after learning about her missing egg. While I won’t dive deeper into this issue for this review, it’s safe to say this episode belongs to Kristen, and Katja Herbers delivers. Her unsettling night terrors suggest an intuitive understanding of some of the manipulations around her, highlighting these moments to the viewer by proxy. Beyond these meta moments, the execution of these night terrors remains pleasantly unsettling.
Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
Among a constant trail of failures, Leland lingers in the background as he puts pieces together for his master plan. We don’t see the full scope of his vision yet, but the suspense it builds for future episodes earns its place. I’m interested to see how these plots will evolve, even if Leland’s luck seems to turn sour. Perhaps it’s because of this dynamic that the tension works so effectively.
With a shocking moment tied into this episode, “The Demon of Parenthood” creates one of the more haunting episodes. However, the greatest accomplishment in the episode is what it establishes for the future of the series. While not all these points follow through by the end of Evil, it’s still an episode that ripples across the show’s progression.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design
Tired Tropes and Triggers
Without diving into too many details, spousal abuse and murder occur in the episode. This abuse might indicate a demonic influence, but such points remain speculation.
A severed body part and some gore stand out in this episode. It hardly earns enough attention from fans of gory horror, but the squeamish should tread carefully toward the end.
Horrible Realizations at Night
What I Dislike about “The Demon of Parenthood”
Many dropped ideas seem genuinely interesting, building to some potential development that receives little payoff. Missing these opportunities will never feel satisfying. While some changes are understandable, it creates holes in the narrative. For example, Dr. Boggs’ dark seduction slows in pace, becoming implied or withheld from the audience soon after “The Demon of Parenthood.” These experiences often adapt the concept of evil that the show seeks to bring to life.
Sheryl’s compliance with Leland’s plan still seems underdeveloped as a concept, especially with how far she takes it in this episode. While later episodes add a different perspective, I can’t help but feel these are retcons or concepts not thoroughly thought out.
Final Thoughts
“The Demon of Parenthood” progresses the plot and delivers some genuinely haunting moments. While a retrospective assessment does note many missed opportunities, the episode stands up beyond these missed opportunities. (4.5 / 5)
Eternal (2004) is a horror thriller written and directed by Wilhelm Liebenberg and Federico Sanchez. This R-rated film stars Caroline Néron, Victoria Sanchez, Conrad Pla, and Ilona Elkin. As of this review, it is available for Amazon Prime members with renting options from Spectrum on Demand.
When Raymond Pope’s (Conrad Pla) wife disappears, he’s swept into the mystery of Elizabeth Kane (Caroline Néron). As his investigation becomes increasingly bizarre, bodies pile up and point to Raymond Pope. Will he clear his name, or will this bloody rampage drown him?
Eternal Poster
What I Like about Eternal
While all of the performances add to the film, Eternal thrives on the charisma and mystique of Caroline Néron’s Elizabeth. She enchants her targets, lowering their defenses until that final moment.
Conrad Pla’s Raymond Pope also requires a delicate approach to succeed. The sleazy and hypocritical detective seems genuinely concerned for his wife (at least initially) and sells that concern. While far from an easy character to root for, the audience understands him and the danger he faces.
There’s a heavy erotic thriller angle that Eternal delivers on. I’ll linger on this point in later sections, but it certainly knows how to build tension within a single scene or between characters. These moments don’t feel forced, and while they often target a male audience, interesting dynamics rise above general exploitative content, if only slightly.
This seems to be a passion project between the creators, Wilhelm Liebenberg and Federico Sanchez. This passion lingers in the moments to deliver something unique, if not without its flaws. The film doesn’t hold back, a point that fluctuates between negative and positive depending on the situation. Regardless, it holds a charm in that commitment that’s hard to replicate without passion behind the scenes.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design
Tired Tropes and Triggers
The film labels itself as “Inspired by True Events,” which only relates to the general discussion of Elizabeth Báthory. It’s also worth mentioning that, much like Vlad Dracula, her story remains heavily dominated by modern interpretations. I won’t pretend to hold exclusive knowledge of these historical figures, but cultural interpretation reduces realism. The claim means little to nothing.
The predatory queer trope applies to Eternal, with little complexity to challenge the point as the violence often targets women. It’s important to note that Elizabeth acts as a femme fatale in general, but the targets remain clear. However, this film did earn a moment of recognition from the Glitter Awards (a clip was used in 2006), which might suggest the standout performance of Caroline Néron’s Elizabeth earns back some goodwill.
Elizabeth (Caroline Néron) and Irina (Victoria Sanchez) Drink Wine and Plot Crime
What I Dislike about Eternal
The erotic thriller holds a stigma that Eternal doesn’t challenge. Elizabeth remains a clear femme fatale with a slightly supernatural twist. While the performance executes this character perfectly, viewers likely know if this remains an interest or a tired cliche for themselves.
While most of Raymond’s acts make sense for the character, I hold issue with the end. Without going into too many details, he is asked to do one thing to protect himself and does the opposite for no reason. Perhaps this indicates supernatural influence, but such a claim lingers in headcanon.
The film ends ambiguously, which hardly seems fitting given the evidence and weakens the overall film. A definitive ending, or something moderately more definitive, would strengthen Eternal.
Final Thoughts
Eternal’s major obstacle in executing its erotic thriller is that of tired tropes in the modern era. If one looks past these dated points, there’s a haunting thriller that can meet moments of excellence. The plot falls short in many areas towards the end of the film. Ultimately, if a vampire-esque thriller interests you, Eternal certainly adds its perception to the niche but in a familiar form. (3.5 / 5)