Why does hardly anyone in the States know who Xavier Dolan is? It could be that he doesn’t make your run of the mill popcorn features meant to numb you for two hours. Or it could be that he’s from Montreal and it’s almost impossible to get a hold of his films. Either way, it’s a shame. His features I Killed My Mother, Matthias & Maxime, and Mommyare all spellbinding dramas set deep in the emotional heart. But the one I’m talking about right now is the 2013 film Tom at the Farm.
A French-Canadian film, meaning it’s spoken in French for those who avoid subtitles, about a young man who becomes the object of a violent farmer’s obsession. Tom at the Farm is not horror in the generic sense. If steered in a different direction it would have easily made for a disturbingly psychological mindf**k of a film, but it prefers a delicate approach. More of an erotic thriller with a very human type of dread. The fear isn’t for the audience to experience themselves, but to connect with the central character as he’s broken into submission. The best way to describe the film is “creepy.”
Dolan co-wrote, directed and stars in the film based on the play by Michel Marc Bouchard. For those into the compare and contrast, book vs movie argument, the playwright was the one who co-wrote the script with Dolan so it’s a worthy adaptation from the original creator himself. I myself prefer the film version because it’s more sinister in its execution.
Meeting the in-laws
When his boyfriend Guillaume dies unexpectedly, Tom (Dolan) travels to the country to meet his in-laws. He meets Guillaume’s mother Agatha (Lise Roy), who had no clue that he even existed or that her son was gay, and Guillaume’s violent older brother Frances (Pierre-Yves Cardinal). The beginning of the film starts with Tom writing a speech he’s prepared for the funeral and it tells you everything you need to know about what’s to come. He writes, “now, all I can do without you, is replace you.”
One of the films few flaws is that we don’t see enough of certain scenes or get enough backstory behind certain moments. From the moment Tom arrives, Frances expresses a deep interest in him that’s bordered on obsession long before they’ve even met. A year before the funeral, Tom and Frances spoke on the phone by accident. Frances called his brother’s apartment and Tom picked up, and Frances remembers almost every word spoken between them.
Advertisement
Frances himself is a great mystery, as was his relationship with the deceased. The guy is either a psychopath or an incredibly dysfunctional lovesick brute. It’s clear that his interest in Tom has something to do with his brother. What that is exactly is up for personal interpretation. Unfortunately, his interest is the worst thing he could ever inflict on Tom. It’s as violent as it is unsettling. There are times where it feels like he is one step away from ripping Tom open and just eating him, citing the Jeffery Dahmer excuse.
“The guy wanted to leave and I didn’t want him to leave” – Dahmer when speaking about his first victim.
The terror begins
Frances refuses to let Tom leave. Using his grief to manipulate his perception of the farm. It’s during this point in the movie where the creep factor kicks it up a notch. About 35 minutes in, Tom accepts the prison as his new reality and just goes along with it. He even grows attached to Frances, developing Stockholm Syndrome. There’s a point where he taps into his captor’s mentality to threaten another guest of the house. The speech at the beginning once again comes into play, “all I can do is replace you.”
Most of the film is Frances and Tom playing their cat and mouse game with the odds very against the poor little mouse. It’s easy to have a love-hate relationship with Tom at the Farm. To be completely enthralled by the central relationship while also screaming at Tom to run away. The acceptance of everything, compiled with the laser focus that is Frances’s “affection” is what’s truly frightening. The psychosexual abuse feels like Frances’s way of saying “I love you”, and it makes the whole thing way more disturbing then it already is.
(4 / 5)
Rachel Roth is a writer who lives in South Florida. She has a degree in Writing Studies and a Certificate in Creative Writing, her work has appeared in several literary journals and anthologies.
@WinterGreenRoth
Smile 2, a psychological supernatural horror, released in October 2024 just in time for Halloween, sees director Parker Finn (Smile, Laura Hasn’t Slept) return with a sequel starring Naomi Scott (Aladdin) as pop star and recovering addict Skye Riley. While Smile 2 boasts a talented cast, it ultimately falls short of its predecessor, offering a familiar storyline with minor variations and a predictable finale. The film attempts to introduce a new method to combat the parasitic ‘Smile Entity’, but this addition fails to elevate the sequel beyond a pale imitation of its chilling predecessor.
The Plot.
Smile 2 begins shortly after the end of the original; just six days after Rose Cotter’s death. During a short interlude scene, we watch as the now cursed Joel attempts to pass the Smile Entity on by killing one criminal in front of another. The plan backfires spectacularly, inadvertently passing the curse onto an innocent bystander named Lewis Fregoli.
The film then shifts gears, introducing Skye Riley, a singer and performer making a triumphant return to the spotlight with a comeback tour after a tumultuous past. During a candid interview on the Drew Barrymore Show, Skye opens up about her struggles with addiction and the devastating loss of her boyfriend in a car accident. Her sobriety journey, however, faces a severe setback when she seeks pain relief from her old high school friend, the unwitting Lewis Fregoli. In a chilling turn of events, Lewis takes his own life while Skye watches, passing the Smile Entity onto her. Unaware of her new cursed existence Skye gets on with rehearsing for her tour, but she begins to notice that strange things are happening. People are smiling at her in an unnatural way and she becomes the target of anonymous attacks and aggressions. When text messages begin to arrive from an unknown number, Skye decides to get some answers.
Highlights.
Let’s not beat about the bush. I found Smile 2 difficult to finish and was struggling at about the hour-and-a-half mark to stay awake. That being said it’s worth watching because everyone needs to see the 3-minute scene of the ‘smilers’ chasing Skye through her apartment. This was possibly the creepiest thing I’ve seen on a screen. The buildup, the synchronicity of the movement of the actors and their positioning, the camera work, and the lighting. I have rewatched it several times and it doesn’t get old. If you are only interested in watching this, fast forward to the 123-minute mark and get ready to be impressed.
Drawbacks.
Where do I start?
My primary concern with Smile 2 is its striking resemblance to its predecessor. The narrative follows a familiar pattern: an attractive woman fleeing a supernatural force, grappling with hallucinations, experiencing a mental health decline, and culminating in the revelation someone close to Skye was the Smiling Entity after all. This repetitive structure diminishes the film’s impact.
Advertisement
While the introduction of a new method for shedding the entity initially offered a glimmer of hope this concept wasn’t fully realized. It just served to add names to the line of people that the entity has infected in the past.
Furthermore, the film’s pacing suffers from excessive focus on Skye’s musical career. Scenes showcasing her stage rehearsals and music videos, while intended to establish her identity as a performer, feel unnecessary and detract from the narrative momentum. Yes, we understand she’s a performer, you told us, you don’t need to prove it. These scenes appear to artificially inflate the film’s runtime, suggesting a lack of confidence in the core story.
The Final Take.
Ultimately, Smile 2 fails to expand upon the established lore of the franchise. The film’s conclusion feels contrived, with a blatant setup for a third installment. Hopefully, if a ‘Smile 3’ is inevitable, the creative team will bring fresh ideas and avoid simply retreading familiar ground.
We’re back again with Goosebumps The Vanishing, episode two. A story too big for one episode, apparently.
Or, maybe this is just a nod to the fact that Stay Out Of The Basement was a two-part episode in the original 1995 show. Either way, after seeing this episode, we could have kept it to one.
The story
We begin this second episode with Anthony investigating the parasitic plant taking over his body. Rather than, I don’t know, going to the hospital, he’s decided to phone a colleague and send her some samples from the bulb he pulls out of his arm with a handheld garden trowel.
Meanwhile, Devin is having his own worries. He’s haunted by what he saw in the sewers. So, he gets CJ to go with him to investigate. What they find is more of the tendrils of the plant that dragged him down through the manhole last episode.
Advertisement
I sure would have liked to see more about that.
Instead, we see Devin pivot to flirting with a newly single Frankie. Because teenage hormones I guess.
Meanwhile, Trey is having a terrible day. First, his girlfriend leaves him. Then, Anthony breaks his car window.
Needing a way to deal with his frustration, Trey decides to break into the Brewers’ basement. There, he starts wrecking up the place. Until he meets the plant creature and has an unfortunate accident.
What worked
The big difference between this episode and the last is the increased gross-out factor. This episode had some straight-up cringy moments. From the tendrils waiving from Anthony’s arm to the whole goat he brings home to feed his new pet, this episode was skin-crawling gross in the best way possible.
Advertisement
The series is called Goosebumps, after all.
What didn’t work
Unfortunately, that’s where my praise ends. This episode, unlike the last, just wasn’t that great.
To start with, there was a lot of unnecessary drama between characters who are not in danger of being eaten by a plant from the inside out.
I especially disliked the focus on the Frankie/Trey/Devin love triangle.
Now, I don’t hate it. This part of the story adds extra emotional depth to the show. We can see why Trey would be especially incensed by his girlfriend falling for the son of the neighbor he’s feuding with. But it would be more enjoyable if it wasn’t so cliche and dramatic.
Advertisement
I hate the way Trey tried to gaslight Frankie. It makes me dislike him when he should be a sympathetic character. I hate how whiny Devin is every time he talks to Frankie. And I hated the impassioned speech Frankie gives after Devin asks her why she was with Trey.
Listen, I understand what we’re going for here. Devin and Cece are not struggling financially. They’re doing alright, and their new friends here in Gravesend are not. We kind of got that without Frankie claiming that her socioeconomic status is why she’s dating a bully and gaslighter. It felt out of place. It felt like pandering. It certainly didn’t feel like something an eighteen-year-old would say. I hated it.
Finally, there was a moment near the end of the episode that irritated me. I don’t want to give too much detail because I wouldn’t dare ruin an R.L. Stine cliffhanger. But, well, it doesn’t make a lot of sense.
I get that we’re watching a show about a carnivorous plant that is going to wreak havoc on this family and neighborhood. I understand the suspension of disbelief. Some might even say I am a little too generous with it. So I can buy into a teenager being absorbed by a plant and turned into a monstrous version of himself.
I can’t buy into what happens at the end of this episode. It doesn’t make sense with the rules established. It certainly doesn’t make any sort of scientific or logical sense. It is a lazy moment meant to further the storyline but threatens the structural integrity of the season.
Advertisement
All in all, this wasn’t the best episode of Goosebumps. But it’s only the second episode. Honestly, the season has plenty of time to go either way.
The movie monsters always approach so slowly. Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream. It takes forever for them to catch their victims.
Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry – It takes forever for them to catch their victims. And yet no one ever seems to get away.
As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry – Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly… And yet no one ever seems to get away. Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it?
Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly… While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream. Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it? The movie monsters always approach so slowly.
Robot Dance from Jennifer Weigel’s Reversals series
So my father used to enjoy telling the story of Thriller Nite and how he’d scare his little sister, my aunt. One time they were watching the old Universal Studios Monsters version of The Mummy, and he pursued her at a snail’s pace down the hallway in Boris Karloff fashion. Both of them had drastically different versions of this tale, but essentially it was a true Thriller Nite moment. And the inspiration for this poem.