In my mind, The Mortuary Collection is a spiritual sequel to the masterful 2007 film Trick ‘r Treat. They’re not at all related or share any kind of connection through creators but I’m choosing to see them as beautifully respectful step-siblings. A unique, fresh, and twisted horror anthology that knows how to tell individual stories without sacrificing the role of the main narrative. Since Trick ‘r Treat, horror anthologies have been drifting in and out of the spotlight with minimal success but The Mortuary Collection beats the snot out of them all. Speaking as someone who had, admittedly, low expectations, this film was a remarkable surprise. More than a surprise actually, I f***king loved it.
Written and directed by Ryan Spindell, The Mortuary Collection opens with the mysterious mortician Montgomery Dark (Clancy Brown) who, after holding a funeral for a young boy, is approached by a young woman named Sam (Caitlin Custer) inquiring about a job opening. She appears to be impressed with the idea of working in a mortuary and is even more impressed with Mr. Dark’s magnificent book collection. He tells her that each addition to his library tells the story of someone who has died. Every soul has a book that details the events of their final moments, and she demands to hear some.
I’d probably do the same so her request is not that surprising.
The film is divided, and perfectly balanced, between the stories Mr. Dark tells and what is going on between him and Sam in the present. There is something strange about the mortuary that grows in prominence as the stories grow in their devilry.
There are four stories followed by a surprise fifth, and not a single one is boring. They follow a pattern that goes from decade to decade, from sin to sin, amusingly connected through the reappearing character Dr. Harold Kubler who pops up as an oblivious observer. They follow a woman who puts her nose where it doesn’t belong, a prickish frat boy that doesn’t use protection (definitely the funniest one), a man who can’t bear the burden of his sick wife any longer, and a true tale of terror titled “The Babysitter Murders” that involves a deranged serial killer. Each warns against a particular “sin.” Giving a worst-case scenario for every bad decision the participants make.
Advertisement
This is typical for horror; stories warning people that no evil deed goes unpunished. Evildoers, either by fate or guilt, will be punished for their choices. However, in a meta take on the anthology, the film acknowledges what it’s doing and even comments on it, “your stories are predicable.” The Mortuary Collection has an odd sense of humor that banks on audience expectation. A final girl, a knife-wielding maniac, women getting punished for premarital sex, and an obvious villain. All horror tropes you regularly expect to see, but the film wears them as a mask. Dangling these safe assumptions over your head like bait until you go to grab one and find out it’s actually something completely different.
Everything leads up to a fifth and final tale of horror starring Sam and Mr. Dark themselves. It’s a phenomenal conclusion that shocks as well as satisfies, revealing the ultimate punishment for a special monster that has hovered in the background since the opening credits, going unseen for much of the film but whose presence can be felt throughout.
Verdict
I have no complaints regarding this film. Structurally, it’s a perfect anthology. Not as bloody as some or thrilling as others, but it’s well balanced, clever, and exhilarating in its own way. Holding it up is the double-sided coin of horror and humor, surrounded by a mix of moral debate, social norms, and honest to God good storytelling. The Mortuary Collection keeps you on your toes, which is what I really love about it. It was a blast and if for some reason you don’t believe me, just look at what Rotten Tomatoes gave it because as of right now The Mortuary Collection stands at 94%. For a horror movie, having such a good critic score is a major achievement.
The Mortuary Collection will premiere on Shudder October 15.
(4.5 / 5)
All photos are property of Shudder, Trapdoor Pictures and Glass Eye Pix
Rachel Roth is a writer who lives in South Florida. She has a degree in Writing Studies and a Certificate in Creative Writing, her work has appeared in several literary journals and anthologies.
@WinterGreenRoth
Smile 2, a psychological supernatural horror, released in October 2024 just in time for Halloween, sees director Parker Finn (Smile, Laura Hasn’t Slept) return with a sequel starring Naomi Scott (Aladdin) as pop star and recovering addict Skye Riley. While Smile 2 boasts a talented cast, it ultimately falls short of its predecessor, offering a familiar storyline with minor variations and a predictable finale. The film attempts to introduce a new method to combat the parasitic ‘Smile Entity’, but this addition fails to elevate the sequel beyond a pale imitation of its chilling predecessor.
The Plot.
Smile 2 begins shortly after the end of the original; just six days after Rose Cotter’s death. During a short interlude scene, we watch as the now cursed Joel attempts to pass the Smile Entity on by killing one criminal in front of another. The plan backfires spectacularly, inadvertently passing the curse onto an innocent bystander named Lewis Fregoli.
The film then shifts gears, introducing Skye Riley, a singer and performer making a triumphant return to the spotlight with a comeback tour after a tumultuous past. During a candid interview on the Drew Barrymore Show, Skye opens up about her struggles with addiction and the devastating loss of her boyfriend in a car accident. Her sobriety journey, however, faces a severe setback when she seeks pain relief from her old high school friend, the unwitting Lewis Fregoli. In a chilling turn of events, Lewis takes his own life while Skye watches, passing the Smile Entity onto her. Unaware of her new cursed existence Skye gets on with rehearsing for her tour, but she begins to notice that strange things are happening. People are smiling at her in an unnatural way and she becomes the target of anonymous attacks and aggressions. When text messages begin to arrive from an unknown number, Skye decides to get some answers.
Highlights.
Let’s not beat about the bush. I found Smile 2 difficult to finish and was struggling at about the hour-and-a-half mark to stay awake. That being said it’s worth watching because everyone needs to see the 3-minute scene of the ‘smilers’ chasing Skye through her apartment. This was possibly the creepiest thing I’ve seen on a screen. The buildup, the synchronicity of the movement of the actors and their positioning, the camera work, and the lighting. I have rewatched it several times and it doesn’t get old. If you are only interested in watching this, fast forward to the 123-minute mark and get ready to be impressed.
Drawbacks.
Where do I start?
My primary concern with Smile 2 is its striking resemblance to its predecessor. The narrative follows a familiar pattern: an attractive woman fleeing a supernatural force, grappling with hallucinations, experiencing a mental health decline, and culminating in the revelation someone close to Skye was the Smiling Entity after all. This repetitive structure diminishes the film’s impact.
Advertisement
While the introduction of a new method for shedding the entity initially offered a glimmer of hope this concept wasn’t fully realized. It just served to add names to the line of people that the entity has infected in the past.
Furthermore, the film’s pacing suffers from excessive focus on Skye’s musical career. Scenes showcasing her stage rehearsals and music videos, while intended to establish her identity as a performer, feel unnecessary and detract from the narrative momentum. Yes, we understand she’s a performer, you told us, you don’t need to prove it. These scenes appear to artificially inflate the film’s runtime, suggesting a lack of confidence in the core story.
The Final Take.
Ultimately, Smile 2 fails to expand upon the established lore of the franchise. The film’s conclusion feels contrived, with a blatant setup for a third installment. Hopefully, if a ‘Smile 3’ is inevitable, the creative team will bring fresh ideas and avoid simply retreading familiar ground.
We’re back again with Goosebumps The Vanishing, episode two. A story too big for one episode, apparently.
Or, maybe this is just a nod to the fact that Stay Out Of The Basement was a two-part episode in the original 1995 show. Either way, after seeing this episode, we could have kept it to one.
The story
We begin this second episode with Anthony investigating the parasitic plant taking over his body. Rather than, I don’t know, going to the hospital, he’s decided to phone a colleague and send her some samples from the bulb he pulls out of his arm with a handheld garden trowel.
Meanwhile, Devin is having his own worries. He’s haunted by what he saw in the sewers. So, he gets CJ to go with him to investigate. What they find is more of the tendrils of the plant that dragged him down through the manhole last episode.
Advertisement
I sure would have liked to see more about that.
Instead, we see Devin pivot to flirting with a newly single Frankie. Because teenage hormones I guess.
Meanwhile, Trey is having a terrible day. First, his girlfriend leaves him. Then, Anthony breaks his car window.
Needing a way to deal with his frustration, Trey decides to break into the Brewers’ basement. There, he starts wrecking up the place. Until he meets the plant creature and has an unfortunate accident.
What worked
The big difference between this episode and the last is the increased gross-out factor. This episode had some straight-up cringy moments. From the tendrils waiving from Anthony’s arm to the whole goat he brings home to feed his new pet, this episode was skin-crawling gross in the best way possible.
Advertisement
The series is called Goosebumps, after all.
What didn’t work
Unfortunately, that’s where my praise ends. This episode, unlike the last, just wasn’t that great.
To start with, there was a lot of unnecessary drama between characters who are not in danger of being eaten by a plant from the inside out.
I especially disliked the focus on the Frankie/Trey/Devin love triangle.
Now, I don’t hate it. This part of the story adds extra emotional depth to the show. We can see why Trey would be especially incensed by his girlfriend falling for the son of the neighbor he’s feuding with. But it would be more enjoyable if it wasn’t so cliche and dramatic.
Advertisement
I hate the way Trey tried to gaslight Frankie. It makes me dislike him when he should be a sympathetic character. I hate how whiny Devin is every time he talks to Frankie. And I hated the impassioned speech Frankie gives after Devin asks her why she was with Trey.
Listen, I understand what we’re going for here. Devin and Cece are not struggling financially. They’re doing alright, and their new friends here in Gravesend are not. We kind of got that without Frankie claiming that her socioeconomic status is why she’s dating a bully and gaslighter. It felt out of place. It felt like pandering. It certainly didn’t feel like something an eighteen-year-old would say. I hated it.
Finally, there was a moment near the end of the episode that irritated me. I don’t want to give too much detail because I wouldn’t dare ruin an R.L. Stine cliffhanger. But, well, it doesn’t make a lot of sense.
I get that we’re watching a show about a carnivorous plant that is going to wreak havoc on this family and neighborhood. I understand the suspension of disbelief. Some might even say I am a little too generous with it. So I can buy into a teenager being absorbed by a plant and turned into a monstrous version of himself.
I can’t buy into what happens at the end of this episode. It doesn’t make sense with the rules established. It certainly doesn’t make any sort of scientific or logical sense. It is a lazy moment meant to further the storyline but threatens the structural integrity of the season.
Advertisement
All in all, this wasn’t the best episode of Goosebumps. But it’s only the second episode. Honestly, the season has plenty of time to go either way.
The movie monsters always approach so slowly. Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream. It takes forever for them to catch their victims.
Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry – It takes forever for them to catch their victims. And yet no one ever seems to get away.
As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry – Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly… And yet no one ever seems to get away. Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it?
Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly… While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream. Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it? The movie monsters always approach so slowly.
Robot Dance from Jennifer Weigel’s Reversals series
So my father used to enjoy telling the story of Thriller Nite and how he’d scare his little sister, my aunt. One time they were watching the old Universal Studios Monsters version of The Mummy, and he pursued her at a snail’s pace down the hallway in Boris Karloff fashion. Both of them had drastically different versions of this tale, but essentially it was a true Thriller Nite moment. And the inspiration for this poem.