Connect with us

Published

on

Steve Miner’s Halloween H20 seems like it was destined to generate mixed feelings. For starters, the man who played Dr. Loomis, Donald Pleasence had died, so he obviously wouldn’t appear in the movie. Fortunately, they didn’t cast someone else to play him, aside from a brief voice impersonation by Tom Kane, and they did not egregiously try to resurrect him through CG animation. These were wise decisions.

However, what might disappoint some fans is that Halloween H20 does abandon the whole “Thorn Trilogy” story arc. Some had been invested in that storyline, and it appeared to be casually tossed away, or sidestepped, if not nuked from orbit. While not everyone appreciates Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers, some did and wanted a follow-up, or they were just thrown off by the abandonment of that story.

Then again, there are always some who wish the story had evolved with Michael Myers’ niece, Jamie Lloyd (Danielle Harris), as the new killer, or maybe as a strange protégé (admittedly, either story idea might have ended up terrible, but the potential was there). On the bright side, Halloween H20 did make a few bold ideas come to life, and we’ll look at those first.

Halloween H20: Strengths?

When looking at horror films, one of the go-to topics will be “the kills.” Halloween H20 actually has a few decent ones. It also pays to remember that, for the most part, the original Halloween featured what might be considered “meat and potato” type kills. It’s mostly just him swiping at people with knives or, in the case of Annie Brackett (Nancy Kyes), a combination of choking and slicing. Steve Miner’s film is not the goriest in the Halloween franchise, but the death of the character Sarah Wainthrope (Jodi Lyn O’Keefe) is particularly memorable (or painful to watch).

As another possible strength, this film doesn’t abandon the premise that Michael (Chris Durand) and Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) are brother and sister — unlike 2018’s Halloween (which sidesteps that, as well as scrapping both the “Thorn Trilogy” story and practically all unique elements from this film, aside from the “Laurie’s revenge” motif).

Personally, I never had a problem with them being related, as I think it adds some depth to the characters. Sure, it humanizes Michael a bit, but less so than similar examples, such as the relationship between Dexter Morgan (Michael C. Hall) and his brother, Brian (Christian Camargo), on the series Dexter. It complicates their dynamic rather than subtracting from it.

I also like how Laurie has largely moved on from the traumatic events of Halloween 1 & 2. In fact, she even has a boyfriend (Adam Arkin), even though they seem awkward and timid with each other. She has moved away from the Myers’ house and is the headmistress at a boarding school. Also, when Michael arrives and the shit predictably hits the fan, there’s never an expectation that she’d attempt to alert Dr. Loomis, even if he was alive. At the same time, this perhaps helps shatter the illusion that Michael could easily kill them all.

Halloween H20: Weaknesses?

Yes, I feel I need to discuss this film’s weaknesses a bit, too, and one of the weaknesses is actually Laurie’s strength. Yes, I know, you might be saying “That’s sexist!” but hear me out. Back when Myers was in his house in Haddonfield, he had what might be called “home-field advantage.” He was basically in his element, where he would stay for a time. Take him out of that and what do you have? Well, it’s a bit like taking Freddy out of Elm Street. Sure, you could do it and maybe it can work, but that certainly doesn’t mean it will work as well.

Add that to the growing perception that Laurie is ready, willing, and able to kick Michael’s ass and a lot of the tension is gone. Now, honestly, I was never that afraid of Michael Myers or most slasher villains, so to lose the fear factor, even more, doesn’t really do this movie favors.

Yes, we might look at the example of someone like Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver), who ended up kicking some alien ass in “Aliens.” However, that was in outer space and more obviously an action movie. While I’m glad they didn’t put Michael in space (as they did with Jason, the Leprechaun, and even Pinhead!), I’m not sure they put him in a compelling place in Halloween H20. It seems like the boarding school environment didn’t add much and, frankly, the matchup between Michael and Laurie also seems to end a little too quickly.

The Big Critique

Plenty of horror movies fail to fully explore their dynamics. Others perhaps benefit from not doing so. At the end of the day, it can be hard to walk that fine line between revealing too little or too much. I can imagine writing Michael Myers is tricky for that reason. In contrast, in some characters, you fully expect them to get cheesier and to have more quirky details revealed. For example, one might expect Chucky (Brad Dourif) to delve deeper into the whole voodoo doll thing, especially when the character actually is a frickin’ doll. Similarly, everyone would expect The Evil Dead franchise to summon some crazy demons.

However, just like you wouldn’t expect a whoopie cushion scene in Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, you probably don’t want Michael to become less mysterious, less threatening than in previous films. In this case, Michael Myers doesn’t really come across as supernatural, or like an evil, mysterious force. He’s a bit more like just some random guy in a Halloween mask. He might still be dangerous, but he doesn’t seem as much like Michael Myers.

I have heard others make this critique, and I’m not trying to rip them off here. It’s just something I definitely agree with. I would contrast it with “Part 4,” in fact. Yes, that movie has some detectable flaws, too, but when Michael Myers falls into a mineshaft, it somehow still feels like it’s him. In fact, to prove I’m not screwing around here and playing favorites with this critique, I’d even say the Michael Myers from the much-hated Halloween: Resurrection is more like the old school Michael than the one from Halloween H20.

Final Thoughts

On the surface, it probably seems like I hate this movie, or like this is a hit piece. I actually don’t hate it, but just think it should’ve been beefed up a bit more, and some things could’ve been better. Yes, Michael’s abandoned house remains freakier than the boarding school environment, and the film lacks the flair of Dr. Loomis (for obvious reasons). Still, this movie ends on a respectable note with a bold decision regarding the main villain’s fate. That alone might be respectable, in some way. And, holy shit, I need to stop typing now…

What are your thoughts on Halloween Water…oops, I mean Halloween H20?! Let us know in the comments! (Just don’t pin us to a tree with a vehicle and lop off our heads over this article)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

You’ll Have a Bloody Good Time with this Eternal (2004) Health Tip

When Raymond Pope’s wife disappears, he follows the trail. But each lead points him to the Eternal beauty of Elizabeth Kane.

Published

on

Eternal (2004) is a horror thriller written and directed by Wilhelm Liebenberg and Federico Sanchez. This R-rated film stars Caroline Néron, Victoria Sanchez, Conrad Pla, and Ilona Elkin. As of this review, it is available for Amazon Prime members with renting options from Spectrum on Demand.

When Raymond Pope’s (Conrad Pla) wife disappears, he’s swept into the mystery of Elizabeth Kane (Caroline Néron). As his investigation becomes increasingly bizarre, bodies pile up and point to Raymond Pope. Will he clear his name, or will this bloody rampage drown him?

At the top of the poster reads Eternal. Below are three clear images. The closest to the viewer is a person in a mask. To the above left of the viewer, there is a female figure emerging from a bath. Below that are two women looking at the viewer, keeping close to each other.
Eternal Poster

What I Like about Eternal

While all of the performances add to the film, Eternal thrives on the charisma and mystique of Caroline Néron’s Elizabeth. She enchants her targets, lowering their defenses until that final moment.

Conrad Pla’s Raymond Pope also requires a delicate approach to succeed. The sleazy and hypocritical detective seems genuinely concerned for his wife (at least initially) and sells that concern. While far from an easy character to root for, the audience understands him and the danger he faces.

There’s a heavy erotic thriller angle that Eternal delivers on. I’ll linger on this point in later sections, but it certainly knows how to build tension within a single scene or between characters. These moments don’t feel forced, and while they often target a male audience, interesting dynamics rise above general exploitative content, if only slightly.

This seems to be a passion project between the creators, Wilhelm Liebenberg and Federico Sanchez. This passion lingers in the moments to deliver something unique, if not without its flaws. The film doesn’t hold back, a point that fluctuates between negative and positive depending on the situation. Regardless, it holds a charm in that commitment that’s hard to replicate without passion behind the scenes.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

The film labels itself as “Inspired by True Events,” which only relates to the general discussion of Elizabeth Báthory. It’s also worth mentioning that, much like Vlad Dracula, her story remains heavily dominated by modern interpretations. I won’t pretend to hold exclusive knowledge of these historical figures, but cultural interpretation reduces realism. The claim means little to nothing.

The predatory queer trope applies to Eternal, with little complexity to challenge the point as the violence often targets women. It’s important to note that Elizabeth acts as a femme fatale in general, but the targets remain clear. However, this film did earn a moment of recognition from the Glitter Awards (a clip was used in 2006), which might suggest the standout performance of Caroline Néron’s Elizabeth earns back some goodwill.

A woman sits on another woman, holding a glass of wine. Both women look at an unseen stranger
Elizabeth (Caroline Néron) and Irina (Victoria Sanchez) Drink Wine and Plot Crime

What I Dislike about Eternal

The erotic thriller holds a stigma that Eternal doesn’t challenge. Elizabeth remains a clear femme fatale with a slightly supernatural twist. While the performance executes this character perfectly, viewers likely know if this remains an interest or a tired cliche for themselves.

While most of Raymond’s acts make sense for the character, I hold issue with the end. Without going into too many details, he is asked to do one thing to protect himself and does the opposite for no reason. Perhaps this indicates supernatural influence, but such a claim lingers in headcanon.

The film ends ambiguously, which hardly seems fitting given the evidence and weakens the overall film. A definitive ending, or something moderately more definitive, would strengthen Eternal.

Final Thoughts

Eternal’s major obstacle in executing its erotic thriller is that of tired tropes in the modern era. If one looks past these dated points, there’s a haunting thriller that can meet moments of excellence. The plot falls short in many areas towards the end of the film. Ultimately, if a vampire-esque thriller interests you, Eternal certainly adds its perception to the niche but in a familiar form.
3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

When “The Demon of Cults” Delivers Your Brand of Evil

The assessors investigate “The Demon of Cults,” the seventh episode of Evil, created by Michelle King and Robert King.

Published

on

“The Demon of Cults” is the seventh episode of Evil, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.

The assessors investigate a cult. David (Mike Colter) struggles to keep his commitment to the Entity as they test his morality. Kristen (Katja Herbers) learns some unsettling plans for her family. Ben (Aasif Mandvi) spends an evening with a friend and meets a divine figure. Dr. Boggs (Kurt Fuller) begins a spiritual journey to write a novel.

Evil written in bold, a snake reaches for an apple. Beneath reads Season 3
Evil Season 3 Cover

What I Like About “The Demon of Cults”

As the brief description above should indicate, Ben endures a lot in this episode. From comedic scenes to genuinely intense moments, Aasif Mandvi delivers a performance that adapts to the plot. His chemistry with a new character (Gia Crovatin’s Renee) also deserves praise as it drives his subplot in the episode.

Brian d’Arcy James’ Victor LeConte returns, bringing this eerie character to life again. While his motives become more comprehensible, his methods continue to create division. As his motives unfold and methods become darker, it upsets many characters.

The last performance to focus on is Gia Crovatin’s Renee. She plays a foil to Ben, showing an intelligent character who blends her spiritual beliefs with her scientific knowledge. This character supposedly appears in “The Demon of Sex,” making a direct claim of this in the episode, but didn’t physically appear in “The Demon of Sex.” Renee makes a lasting impression through her charisma and chemistry with Ben.

This episode returns to a few points of the RSM Fertility plotline. While it doesn’t satisfy lingering questions, it does enough to show Evil hasn’t dropped the plotline entirely. The implications hit Kristen particularly hard as it directly relates to her family.

While the last few episodes hold a haunting beginning or end, “The Demon of Cults” excels in the middle of its narrative. Not every moment earns the level of haunting its viewers, but those moments stand out.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

A running motif of the episode follows the processes of cult indoctrination and deprogramming. “The Demon of Cults” doesn’t dive deep into this material but remains a key element to many plotlines. It also briefly mentions Qanon, broadening the cultish focus to one beyond spirituality.

“The Demon of Cults” remains a bloodier episode of Evil, bringing out a truly exceptional scene to those squeamish at the sight. It’s not particularly gory, focusing more on the liquid spectacle, but a point worth referencing.

While not shown, an animal sacrifice supposedly occurs. The viewer doesn’t see the exact moment of this act but does see the leading moment and results. A character confirms the sacrifice shortly after, leaving little ambiguity.

An older man looks at a music box, looking defeated and focused.
To Thine Muse Be True

What I Dislike About “The Demon of Cults”

“The Demon of Cults” doesn’t unpack Ben’s suffering in this episode. From addressing some of his childhood trauma to navigating the unclear motives of the cult, Ben doesn’t get the opportunity to dive into these plot points with much depth. Some of these elements will earn later focus but little follow-through.

It’s never directly shown how the Entity comes to know the events they know. Some points are observation and spying, but others require a level of intuition that needs some explanation. Future revelations might add a potential theory, but these points remain headcanon without confirmation.

A kraken emerges from the ocean, attacking a ship. The tint suggests the image is a map icon.

Final Thoughts

“The Demon of Cults” explores the evils of indoctrination and the trial of deprogramming. While some elements are underdeveloped or lightly touched on, the episode still possesses some moments that haunt the viewer. While it’s far from the most haunting episode, it does provide lingering points for the show to follow and an exceptional ending to tie everything together.
3 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

A Taste of Cosmic and Occult Horror, or Messiah of Evil

Arletty searches for her estranged father in a remote town, witnessing illogical events that only grow stranger in Messiah of Evil.

Published

on

Messiah of Evil (1974) is a Lovecraftian horror film written and directed by Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz. This R-rated horror film stars Michael Greer, Marianna Hill, Joy Bang, and Anitra Ford. As of this review, the film is available on Tubi TV, Hoopla, Shudder, AMC+, Screambox and much more.

Arletty (Marianna Hill) searches for her estranged father in a remote town, witnessing illogical events that only grow stranger. After meeting Thom (Michael Greer), a bizarre artist, and his female companions (Joy Bank as Toni and Anitra Ford as Laura), she finds moderately normal help against the growing madness. But as the forces against them grow, madness seems a blissful peace.

Several pale people stand over raw meat in a grocery store. It looks as though they are eating the meat raw.
Ghoulish Dinning in Messiah of Evil

What I Like about Messiah of Evil

There’s a Lovecraftian focus on this occult horror, following many aspects that distinguish H.P. Lovecraft from the Cosmic Horror genre he inspired. Specifically, the town feels straight out of one of his stories, with locals openly hostile and awkward to outsiders.

There’s a continued eeriness to the scenes that beats with the allure of Lovecraft. At times, this doesn’t inherently yield logical sense, but the growing strangeness fits the film’s reality.

Sale
Messiah Of Evil (Standard Special Edition) [Blu-ray]
  • A woman arrives in a sleepy seaside town after receiving unsettling letters from her father, only to discover the town is under the influence of a strange cult that weeps tears of blood and hunger for human flesh
  • From Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz, the writers of American Grafitti, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and Howard the Duck, this dreamy and atmospheric film transposes the post-Night of the Living Dead zombie movie to a surreal small-town American setting, presented through gorgeous Techniscope visuals that echo the stylish European horror of Mario Bava and Hammer
  • A true cult film, Messiah of Evil, which was also released as Dead People, has overcome distribution challenges to enjoy growing awareness and high acclaim after decades of word-of-mouth enthusiasm among horror cinema fans and critics around the world
Messiah of Evil (The Film Detective Restored Version)
  • Hailed in 2003 by The British Film Institute as “a rare work of cinematic genius,” this occult tale comes from writer/director Willard Huyck, known for his work on such popular movies as American Graffiti, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and of course, Howard the Duck
  • Starring a bevy of 1970s eye candy, including Anitra Ford, Joy Bang, and Marianna Hill, Messiah of Evil is about a young woman (Hill) whose search for her missing father brings her to a strange seaside town under the influence of a mysterious cult
Messiah Of Evil Limited
  • A woman arrives in a sleepy seaside town after receiving unsettling letters from her father, only to discover the town is under the influence of a strange cult that weeps tears of blood and hunger for human flesh
  • From Willard Huyck and Gloria Katz, the writers of American Grafitti, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and Howard the Duck, this dreamy and atmospheric film transposes the post-Night of the Living Dead zombie movie to a surreal small-town American setting, presented through gorgeous Techniscope visuals that echo the stylish European horror of Mario Bava and Hammer
  • A true cult film, Messiah of Evil, which was also released as Dead People, has overcome distribution challenges to enjoy growing awareness and high acclaim after decades of word-of-mouth enthusiasm among horror cinema fans and critics around the world

Last update on 2025-02-19 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

I am a fan of the ghoulish, and there are plenty of ghoulish figures in Messiah of Evil. First, they linger in the shadows but are ever-present in the plot. As Messiah of Evil builds to its conclusion, these ghoulish forces surround the protagonists. They seem haunted and changed by the cosmic truths of the film.

It’s in this unsettling and creepy atmosphere that Messiah of Evil shines among other Lovecraftian works. Lovecraftian horror films often struggle to communicate this atmosphere, rarely diving into the madness that Messiah of Evil excels in.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

Gore seems the most obvious point to mention, along with body horror to some degree. While Messiah of Evil doesn’t linger in its gore, some moments challenge the squeamish. Some of these moments loosely qualify as body horror, but not nearly enough for fans of the genre.

One can make the case that some female characters are depicted as shallow. However, many characters follow a specific and familiar quirk for Lovecraftian films. The female characters earn an equivalent amount of development to their male counterparts, if shallow at times.

There is an awkward romance between Arletty and Thom. It’s reminiscent of the poorly executed lead romances that seem part of a studio checklist. However, the strange events and eeriness of the characters help make this decision more digestible.

A dark background obscures a woman's face, only revealing the cheek, nose and mouth. A stream of red runs down the cheek, suggesting tears. Below reads "Messiah of Evil."
Messiah of Evil Alt DVD Cover

What I Dislike about Messiah of Evil

These issues are more careful considerations for viewers to decide on. There’s a stilted awkwardness that remains a common acting choice for Lovecraftian films. This helps create an eerie atmosphere, but it’s a required taste.

The mystery does invite interest, but Messiah of Evil doesn’t build these mysteries with a desire to satisfy its viewers. Some mysteries get answers as soon as they are raised, and others end abruptly when the film refocuses its attention. There is one exception to this pattern, leading to the heart of the Lovecraftian horror. That mystery should take priority, but it doesn’t.

With a 1974 release date, Messiah of Evil remains a dated film in many ways. There’s something about the color pallet and cinematography that seems timeless, but it remains an older film. Don’t expect a modern design or expensive special effects. 

A kraken emerges from the ocean to attack a ship. The tint suggests this is an old map icon.

Final Thoughts

Messiah of Evil brings to life the Lovecraftian horror so overlooked in films. While it’s far from perfect, the film shows the unraveling power Lovecraftian horror possesses. The greatest challenge in adapting Lovecraftian works is communicating the overwhelming unknowability of the cosmos. There are many moments where the viewer feels that unknowable madness. Messiah of Evil earns a place for fans of the Lovecraftian genre.
4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending