This week I am diving into Dave Made a Maze, a film I missed when it came out in 2017. I recently stumbled onto it while idly browsing Amazon Prime. So, I was curious. It is now a few years removed from the release, and not having heard anyone talk about it lately, I wasn’t sure what to expect.
So, it is clear from the title that Dave made a maze… but does it make for a good movie? Let’s dig in.
Dave Made a Maze
Release Date: August 18, 2017
Production: Butter Stories, Dave Made An LLC, Foton Pictures
Distributor: Gravitas Ventures
Run Time: 80 Minutes
Genre: Horror, Fantasy, Adventure, Comedy
Streaming On: Shudder, Amazon Prime, Peacock, Tubi, Crackle (and many more)
Dave Made a Maze is a 2017 horror fantasy adventure comedy directed by Bill Watterson (Hollywood Wasteland) and based on a screenplay written by Watterson and Steven Sears based on a story by Sears. The film follows the trouble that arises when an unsatisfied artist named Dave gets lost in his cardboard maze. His girlfriend Annie and their friends enter to rescue him only to discover the labyrinth is significantly more extensive and more complicated than it looks, and there are deadly traps within – including a mythical minotaur.
Dave Made a Maze stars Nick Thune (The Possession of Hannah Grace) as Dave, Meera Rohit Kumbhan (Weird Loners) as Annie, with Adam Busch (Altered Carbon), James Urbaniak (The Venture Brothers), and Stephanie Allynne (In a World…) as assorted friends pulled into the strange situation.
What Worked
The film is, above all else, a delightfully crafted film from a design sense. The cinematography highlights the textural elements of the movie down to all the cardboard set design and handcraft gore. The film has a wonderfully artistic quality, and it is delightful to witness the strange and otherworldly nature of the cardboard labyrinth. As far as set design goes, Dave Made a Maze can be charming.
As far as aesthetics go, Jon Boal’s cinematography is excellent in highlighting every seam and fold while keeping the cardboard environments equally claustrophobic and cavernous. David Egan’s editing is also tight. The soundtrack by Mondo Boys is also quite pleasant but has that mid-2010s indie sound.
The performances are good, particularly Meera Rohit Kumbhani and Nick Thune as the co-leads. The relationship between Annie and Dave unfolds in layers. One powerful scene features the two at a kitchen table going through a series of day-to-day conversations that reveal the malaise they each feel. Also of note is James Urbaniak as Harry, the filmmaker of the group. Harry is a fascinating character who seems callous and exploitative of the genuine danger of the maze. But in one pivotal scene, his ambition is stripped away, showing a vulnerability and anxiety not present elsewhere as he grapples with whether or not a friend is truly there or just a trick of the cardboard labyrinth.
What Didn’t Work
The film has a few issues as fun as the film is to look at, given the quality of the performances. When it comes to the horrific elements, there are creepy and unusual visuals, but the comedic elements generally undercut them. The spray of yarn in place of blood is funny, but there is no real sense of urgency. The lack of urgency is compounded by the surprisingly low-key reactions of the characters to the insanity that surrounds them. Their initial reactions of shock, but the further into the labyrinth they go, the more desensitized they become to it all.
The surreality of the set is probably the film’s greatest achievement. Still, any feelings the setting should inspire in the characters beyond exasperation and confusion are mainly absent, making the whole film feel a little empty. I am not necessarily expecting emotional nuance in a movie about a cardboard maze that is larger than it appears. Yet, I hope the characters act more disturbed by the implications, especially with some of the lingering effects of the conclusion.
The film also establishes some gags using characters for brevity and comedy, but those characters disappear outright by the end. Several elements of the film remain unresolved by the end, and I wondered what exactly had happened. I’d instead have had those characters omitted than not gain a resolution to their presence in the story. The result makes the film’s emotional throughline run as hollow as a cardboard box.
Final Impressions of Dave Made a Maze
Dave Made a Maze is a film that is entertaining but ultimately haphazard in execution. Characters are less developed personalities and rather gags or tools for the emotional throughline of the leads. Any answers about what the hell is going on are left unexplored to the degree that you may question, “why does this matter?”
Bill Watterson’s film is breezy, pretty funny, and looks like it takes a page from the canon of Michel Gondry but lacks stakes, which is ironic given the somewhat sizable body account the labyrinth racks up. Dave Made a Maze is worth a watch, but the ironic detachment leaves the whole project a little empty and artificial, which at least is in line with the cardboard sets.
(3 / 5)
If you’ve seen Dave Made A Maze, please let me know your thoughts in the comments. I’d love to read your take.
What Lies Below (2020) is a horror film written and directed by Braden R. Duemmler. This TV-MA film stars Ema Horvath, Trey Tucker, and Mena Suvari. The film is available on Hoopla, Tubi TV, Peacock Premium Plus, the Roku Channel, History Vault, and Amazon Prime Video.
Libby (Ema Horvath) returns to her family’s lake house before leaving for college. Her mother (Mena Suvari as Michelle Wells) uses this opportunity to have Libby meet her boyfriend (Trey Tucker as John Smith). Despite the draw of a handsome scientist, the more Libby learns about the man, the stranger he seems.
What I Like about What Lies Below
The film balances the line between sci-fi and supernatural horror. One of those options seems to fit slightly better, but What Lies Below doesn’t feel the need to tell its audience some objective truth. Instead, it respects the viewer to come to their own conclusion.
Ema Horvath has the most to work with and provides an interesting character in Libby. Libby remains a reserved and shy character, displaying an unhealthy dose of longing that requires subtle habits and glances to communicate her thoughts. Yet, the viewer often knows what she’s thinking.
Last update on 2025-01-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
That said, there’s a level of camp across all the performances. It’s hard to say if this is an intentional choice but viewing it as an intentional choice adds to these performances. However, it’s worth mentioning this as a hard selling point.
Without diving into spoilers, the ending did surprise me to some degree. I was wrong about how hard What Lies Below would end. In short, this film gets surprisingly dark. It doesn’t linger in that darkness, but What Lies Below doesn’t compromise its plot for a comforting conclusion.
Tired Tropes and Triggers
Body horror seems to be the most obvious trigger to mention. It’s less the body mutating kind of horror and more the parasite growing inside the body kind. Most of this remains implied, or we see only the aftermath, but the points seem clear.
A sexual assault leads to a general shift in the film. Part of this assault is handled with uncomfortable realism as the survivor doubts the severity of the assault and receives pushback when she reveals the truth. While this realism certainly has its place, it also deserves a warning.
What I Dislike about What Lies Below
This film might have been better served diving into its campier side instead of loosely adding those moments. Ultimately, the performances suffer from a lack of commitment, teetering between a serious approach or a campier execution.
What Lies Below is far from a high-budget film. While it can hide its lower budget, there are clear moments that visibly show the strain. If it committed to the camp or creativity of many B-films, it might better haunt its viewers.
What Lies Below only loosely attempts to channel the creature feature. It occasionally introduces something more bestial and inhuman but doesn’t give more than a glimpse. With the revelry given to lampreys and the title, I wrongly suspected something within the watery depths to show.
While the film remains dark, I won’t particularly call it haunting. While the seductive creature isn’t as common as its female counterpart, it’s far from an untested concept. The major problem with What Lies Below is that it doesn’t do enough to stand out or linger in the mind. Instead, it hints at something brewing, smacks you with a dark end, and calls it a day.
Final Thoughts
What Lies Below implements elements of a memorable creature feature but fails to haunt its viewers. While its restraint in explaining its plot deserves respect, it doesn’t supplement that with something terrifying enough to break the surface. It’s hard to recommend this film to eager viewers looking for a creature in its feature. Instead, it might better suit an audience who craves a subtle mystery by the lakeside. (2.5 / 5)
Oh, the 90s, the renaissance of the slasher genre after it crashed and burned in the mid-80s. Halloween H20 is the seventh installment in the Halloween franchise. It hits a reset button on the canon, which utilizes the strong points of the decade. Without any further ado, let’s dive in!
Plot
We start with seemingly random characters as they die at the hands of Michael Myers, who is back for vengeance. He wants to find Laurie and is not willing to let anyone else stand in his way. Here is where the franchise diverges into a different canon that ignores all the movies after the second one.
After a wonderful tribute to the late Donald Pleasance we see Laurie. She is now a headmistress at a boarding school in California, with a new name and a son. Laurie appears functioning on the outside, but she is still traumatized by the past events, medicating both with prescription meds and alcohol. Not even her love interest (a fellow teacher) knows anything about her past.
Her son John doesn’t understand the severity of what his mother has been through. He repeatedly tells her to get over it (not the brightest moment despite him being a teenage boy). More teenage characters are introduced in the form of his girlfriend played by Michelle Williams in her Dawson’s Creek prime, and two friends.
John and the group want to stay at the empty boarding school while everyone else goes on a camping trip. What they think will be a romantic couples’ weekend turns into anything but. Michael catches up to Laurie and finds his way into the premises. What ensues is a blood-shed with some creative kills and full-on suspense.
Laurie takes a stand against Michael as she chases him down axe in hand, ready to finish this once and for all. This leads to a showdown with a glorious finale as Laurie decapitates Michael, seemingly ending his reign for good (or so we think).
Overall thoughts
Halloween H20 is a great overhaul of a franchise that was running out of steam. It encapsulates everything about the 90s, from the camera work to the soundtrack to the cheesy one-liners. It has a star-studded cast of the sweethearts of the decade and who could be mad at Jamie Lee Curtis’s comeback?
This movie takes an interesting approach to Laurie’s character. She spends the second movie kind of helpless waiting for someone to save her, however this time she takes the lead and faces her trauma head-on. Other characters have just enough development to make you care for their survival. The atmosphere is very reminiscent of the first one as well, with a bit of a slow burn before the big finish.
Ultimately, this is the most entertaining instalment of the franchise and has a lot of rewatchability for those movie nights. Slasher 2.0 at its best.
The New Daughter (2009) is a PG-13 horror film and Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut. The film is based on John Connolly’s short story of the same name. The New Daughter stars Kevin Costner, Ivana Baquero, Samantha Mathis, and Gattlin Griffith. As of this review, the film is available on VUDU Free, The CW, Hoopla, Tubi TV, Freevee, and Plex, with additional purchase options.
John James (Kevin Costner) moves his children to a rural South Carolina town to start anew after his wife leaves him. Louisa James (Ivana Baquero) can’t stand this change, and Sam James (Gattlin Griffith) doesn’t understand why his mother isn’t with them. But after finding a burial mound, their attitudes suddenly switch. As John uncovers more of their new home’s history, he realizes there’s much to fear.
What I Like About Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut
Despite its 2009 release date, the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Films nominated it for the Saturn Awards’ Best DVD Release in 2011. As Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut, the film manages to hold an audience with a tight script and direction.
The acting sells this ominous mystery, which might otherwise become obscure amongst others in the genre. In particular, Kevin Costner’s John James and Ivana Baquero’s Louisa James center The New Daughter around their characters’ strained father-daughter relationship.
Ultimately, The New Daughter thrives in its atmosphere and execution. If we take the film plot point by plot point, The New Daughter doesn’t break the mold. Between Luiso Berdejo’s direction and the writing of John Travis and John Connolly, however, the film executes this uncomfortable tension that invests viewers.
Last update on 2025-01-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
It’s in The New Daughter‘s execution where it haunts its audience. There’s this uncomfortable powerlessness as John attempts to protect his family against the horrors in the mound and its corrupting influence.
The ending might seem uncommitted, but I would disagree. The film executes a balance between hope and horror that leads to ambiguity but doesn’t leave the audience dissatisfied. A bolder film might conclude with an unhappy ending, but The New Daughter gives a sliver of hope in its dark ending.
Tired Tropes and Triggers
A cat dies in the film. The act isn’t shown, but I understand this can be a dealbreaker. In loose connection, there are also animal carcasses.
There’s a loose and underdeveloped connection to Native American mythology, following along the idea of “Indian (Native Americans) burial grounds.” While this initial thought proves inaccurate, it still holds familiar plot points that might irk some.
There are some strange decisions revolving around Louisa. Needless to say, a part of the plot revolves around her beginning puberty. While nothing is explicit, the creatures require a mate, which suggests sexual assault.
What I Dislike about Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut
The aesthetic of the burial mound doesn’t seem particularly noteworthy. This becomes a problem when it looks like any hill in a forest. I don’t particularly see how the James family recognizes this as something strange and worth fixating on. As the film progresses, there are obvious reasons, but the aesthetic doesn’t execute this strangeness.
As addressed above, the premise remains familiar and safe, perhaps too safe. A family moves into a rural home, escaping a past withheld from the audience. The mother is out of the picture, and the father struggles to connect with his young daughter. I don’t subscribe to the idea that these are lazy points, but it might seem formulaic with how thick it dominates the film’s beginning.
Final Thoughts
The New Daughter is an impressive feature-length debut but one with notable flaws. There’s a familiarity and safety in the plot that hinders what could have been. However, the ominous mystery and acting provide the needed execution to create a haunting experience. If you’re looking for a horror following a terrified family against supernatural creatures, The New Daughter delivers.