Spook Warfare, released in 1968, is the second film in the ‘Yokai Monsters’ trilogy written by Tetsuro Yoshida. Previously we looked at 100 Monsters, the first in this thematic trilogy. Though it was released in the same year as 100 Monsters, the two are very different films. Pacing, storytelling, tone, and even special effects have dramatically increased.
The previous film focuses nearly exclusively on humans and their disregard for the spiritual. Spook Warfare, on the other hand, puts the spotlight directly on creepy monsters from the get-go. It’s a lot more accessible than the previous movie and would have probably been a better way to start off the trilogy.
A fierce Babylonian demon(Chikara Hashimoto) is freed when grave robbers attempt to steal his magical staff. He buries them in a rockslide and immediately heads to Japan, as any ancient evil would. Upon arrival, he appears to Isobe, the local magistrate(Takashi Kanda, who played Tajimaya in 100 Monsters) kills him, and possesses his body by drinking his blood. Isobe returns and immediately begins destroying all of the holy altars and shrines, demanding his servants do the same.
Beefin’ Over Turf
The ruckus pulls the attention of a Kappa(Gen Kuroki) that lives in the palace pond. A self-proclaimed protector of the palace, Kappa is able to see through the demon’s disguise and attacks right away. However, the demon overpowers him easily and Kappa flees to a ruin where other yokai live to beg for help.
The magistrate is so popular and well-liked, even among the spirits, so they don’t believe Kappa and refuse to help. Back at the palace, Isobe’s daughter Chie(Akane Kawasaki) and the samurai Shinpachiro(Yoshihiko Aoyama) discover one of the palace workers drained of blood. Knowing they’re dealing with a monster, Shinpachiro contacts a Buddhist priest for aid in helping them dispatch the demon. They set a trap, but it ends up failing and the priest is killed.
Advertisement
The possessed Isobe demands his guards bring all nearby people to the palace so he can feed on them. As the guards are rounding up the villagers, two children escape and stumble into the ruin where Kappa is begging for help. A ungakiyo (usually a mirror, but appearing in this movie as a large bear who can project images of what is happening on his giant stomach by holding his breath – wild, right?) appears, informing the yokai the demon is named Daimon, an ancient spirit from Babylon. This confirms everything Kappa has told them and they decide to help the humans dispatch Daimon. Not just because he killed Isobe, but because it is their duty, as proud Japanese spirits, to expunge any foreign threats on their land.
Oh! What A Lovely Yokai War
As mentioned before, the tone for this movie is quite a bit lighter than the previous one – despite there being an actual, you know, WAR in it. There’s quite a bit of comedy and Kabuki-style acting in quite a few of the scenes. Straight away Daimon is a credible threat to the heroes in the movie. And despite some of the yokai’s shenanigans (particularly the over-confident Kappa), their individual personalities shine through.
Considering this film was made in the late 60s, the special effects, costumes, and monster puppets look pretty good! The lighting and blocking do a lot to cover the seams, helping the movie feel a lot more atmospheric. The humans play second fiddle to the yokai throughout but are still very well written and placed in this story.
Overall this is a much more accessible movie than the initial film in the trilogy. Like 100 Monsters, you’ll get more out of it if you are familiar with yokai history, but it’s not a prerequisite. Spook Warfare fits comfortably with the likes of movies that were hits in the late 70’s-early 80’s American cinema. People into movies like Gremlins, The Goonies or Little Monsters will feel very at home here. If you are love creature features, Japanese cinema or fun films, Spook Warfare should be on your ‘Must Watch’ list. Yoshida-san, you are two for two on the trilogy so far. Can you stick the landing? We’ll find out when we review Along With Ghosts.
(4 / 5)
To a lot of fans, this is the film that killed the franchise. It says a lot that the next installment is yet another retcon. Halloween VI: The Curse of Michael Myers attempts to explain Michael’s unrelenting evil, which lead to mixed opinions from longtime fans. There are two cuts of the film, theatrical vs producer’s. For a lot of people, the latter is the only one worth mentioning. Aiming to be as accurate as possible, I will be talking about the producer’s cut. Let’s begin!
Plot
We start Halloween VI with a six-year time jump from part five. Jamie is now barefoot and recently pregnant, running away from Michael as he wants her baby. While she manages to hide the little one away, Michael finally gets his hunger satiated by killing her. The moment is one of the most brutal ways in the franchise up until that point. Rest in peace, Jamie, you held your ground for as long as you could, the sequels were just too relentless.
The movie then cuts to a whole different scene going on. We have a new family living in the Myers house and their youngest child is hearing voices telling him to kill his loved ones. Tommy Lloyd is watching the family, played by none other than Paul Rudd in his first-ever theatrical role. Tommy still carries trauma from the events all those years ago when Laurie Strode was babysitting him. So when he finds Jamie’s baby, his part in the story becomes even more essential.
Advertisement
Dr Loomis also stars in what was Donald Pleasance’s final role before his passing. He and Tommy try to stop Michael once and for all before the cycle can repeat itself. As it turns out, Michael is a victim of a druid cult which makes him want to kill his family members every Halloween. Thorn, the cult in question, thinks they can control Michael and make him do their bidding. This results in catastrophe and Michael goes berzerk and kills all the cult members. Once again, it’s one of the most gruesome montages for the franchise up until that point.
Tommy and Kara are left to face Michael on their own which they manage to do with some corrosive liquid and good luck. However, nothing stays dead in this franchise as it’s soon revealed Michael somehow escaped and this time Dr Loomis might not be so lucky…
Overall thoughts
I would say for me personally Halloween VI definitely ranks somewhere near the bottom. The whole point of Michael is that there is no rhyme or reason to his killings and this film tries to go against that. I am glad the mistake was rectified by the upcoming installment. There were still some good things about it, such as Paul Rudd’s acting that reveals some raw talent as far as I’m concerned, as well as some direction choices and musical score. However, I also think it absolutely deserves all the criticism that it gets.
We’ve reached the final episode of American Horror Stories, season three. After the ups and downs of the season, I didn’t know what to expect. I felt that we were due a big finish, Killer Queens. But I feared we were in for a big letdown.
As it turns out, The Thing Under The Bed was neither.
The story
We begin our story with a little girl named Mary, who is scared of something under her bed. She sneaks out of her room, only to be caught by her father and sent back to sleep. And of course, there is something horrible waiting for her under her bed.
This scene cuts away to a woman named Jillian. She has strange dreams, including one about Mary. But her husband, Mark, doesn’t want to hear about it. He’s only interested in a little lovemaking because he wants a baby. Jillian doesn’t, which makes total sense because she’s already married to one. But her irritation with her childish husband goes away when he goes away. And by goes away, I mean he’s sloppily devoured by something vicious under their bed.
Advertisement
What worked
In short, this episode just worked. The acting was professional and believable. The cinematography and lighting work were wonderful, adding spooky effects and startling moments without impairing visibility.
Best of all, the story was solid. There were no plotholes to be found. Our main character, Jillian, was relatable and sympathetic.
This was maybe my favorite part of the story. I thought Jillian was a remarkably sympathetic character. She was dealt a hand she never asked for, having her husband slaughtered in their bedroom. I don’t think she missed him, so much as she was afraid of the legal ramifications of being caught with literal blood on her hands.
Then, when it would have been safest for her to just lay low and save up for a good defense attorney, she instead goes into unlikely hero mode. She does her best to save people, putting herself in legal and physical danger. It’s hard not to root for her.
It’s also a little hard not to root for the antagonist, too. I don’t want to ruin the twist for you, so I’m going to tread lightly here. But it’s great when you have an antagonist who might be off their rocker, but also maybe has a point.
Advertisement
What didn’t work
I can only really think of one complaint with this episode. And that is how frequently one character says the word Chickadee. And if you’ve seen the episode, you know what I am talking about.
I get it, he has a pet name for his daughter. It’s adorable. It’s meant to convey that the two of them have a healthy loving relationship and I get it. We all get it. Blind monks get it. But the fact remains that no parent on Earth calls their kid by their pet name every single time they speak an individual sentence to them. It was just too damn much.
All in all, this was a good episode. It was a classic story, turned on its head, told by professionals from start to finish. And I hope that if there is another season, we see more stories like this one. But after the efforts put into this season at large, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the last we see of American Horror Stories.
If you’ve watched enough short-form horror anthology shows, you’ll notice that some stories are mainstays. Each show seems to put on the same sort of episodes, with the occasional surprising storyline that we’ve never (or at least rarely) seen before.
Leprechaun was an example of a repeated story—the story of a greedy thief whose punishment far outweighs the crime.
The story
We begin our story in 1841, with a drunk man leaving the bar one late night. He’s distracted by something glowing at the end of the well. When he reaches down for the glowing thing, he falls in. Moments later, he screams.
We then cut to the modern day. The well is still there, and now it’s surrounded by a dying town. In this town lives a young man named Colin. He’s married, his wife is pregnant, and he’s out of work. Like many of his friends.
Advertisement
Desperate for cash, Colin and his friends decide to rob a bank. They put together an Equate version of Ocean’s Eleven, and break in one night. But, of course, they find that the gold is nothing more than bait. And the creature waiting for them is something they never expected.
What worked
The first thing I want to point out is how real this episode felt. At least to anyone currently living in the same small town they grew up in. These characters felt like guys I went to school with. Guys I would see at the bar.
I appreciated the real anger and frustration these characters are feeling. Especially Colin. He’s bitter, and maybe he has a right to be. He did exactly what he was supposed to do to succeed. He went to school and invested in his career, and yet now he’s out of work and struggling to support his family. I probably don’t need to tell you how that feels. Because of this, we can all kind of understand why he was tempted to rob a bank.
I also want to talk about the fact that this was, as I said, an often-explored story. That can be a bad thing, but it can also be a good thing. This story is told over and over because it’s a good story. A relatable story. And there’s nothing wrong with that.
What didn’t work
That being said, this version didn’t try to do much to break out of the mold.
Because we have seen this story so many times, most of us could tell the story themselves. I would have expected something new, or some twist. But, in the end, the story didn’t bring anything new to the discussion.
Advertisement
Maybe because of this, the ending left a lot to be desired. Trapped in the basement of the bank, everyone just sort of stares at everyone else, until the thieves give up. And that’s it. The ending wasn’t scary, shocking, or funny. It was just sad, on multiple levels.
Overall, this was an okay story. It was entertaining, if not surprising. I would compare this episode to homemade macaroni and cheese. Everyone’s got their own version, they’re all pretty good, and none of them are exciting.
There’s just one episode left in this season of American Horror Stories. Let’s hope they’ve saved the best for last.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.