Swissploitation is a word one doesn’t think too much about. Of all the exploitation (I hear Brannyk likes BigfeetSploitation!) we’ve covered, I don’t think the Swiss ever came up in a staff meeting–then came Mad Heidi (2022).
Welcome to the wild and wacky world of Mad Heidi 2022! This Swiss film, funded by an enthusiastic crowd, takes you on a rollercoaster ride of cheesy goodness. Starring Casper Van Dien and boasting a unique visual style, Mad Heidi certainly delivers on its promise of mindless escapism. In this article, we’ll dive into the film’s strengths, weaknesses, and the ultimate journey of its kick-ass protagonist, Heidi. So grab your snacks and beers, and let’s get ready for an adventure in the Swiss Alps!
They crowdfunded?!
Before we embark on our exploration of Swissploitation, it’s important to acknowledge Mad Heidi’s independent and crowd-funded nature. This disclaimer sets the stage for the film’s visual effects, which may not be on par with Hollywood blockbusters. It’s not going to make Michael Bay sweat over losing his job, but it’s not exactly what you’d think of as low budget. This isn’t Rollergator, more like Rollerball. While noticeable, these visual flaws don’t detract from the passion that shines through the screen. Mad Heidi embraces its independent spirit and presents a unique and charming visual style that adds to its overall appeal.
Truth be told, I watched this movie first before finding out the backstory. The acting, set, design, and concept push this movie well beyond what most would think ‘crow funded’ will produce. This goes to show maybe a good idea (and a little luck) can still score a hit on the silver screen.
The Changing Accents and Van Dien’s Presence
One of the quirks of Mad Heidi is the inconsistent accents throughout the film, particularly with Casper Van Dien’s character. With Van Dien seemingly changing accents in every scene, it can be a bit distracting. However, this inconsistency doesn’t overshadow the film’s entertainment value. Van Dien’s presence adds a certain charisma to the story, making it easier to overlook the occasional accent slip-ups–if they are slip-ups. I am not 100% on Van Dien not doing this on purpose. Sure, maybe the movie was shot in parts spread over a long time and he simply forgot his accents, but Van Dien is known to be a great actor who takes craft seriously. I think this is just part of the ‘Swissploitation’ experience. It’s a way to make fun of the movies that have done rather horrible accents (on purpose like Inglorious or on accident like well..Inglorious).
Heidi’s Transformation and Revenge
Heidi’s journey from innocence to a kick-ass fighting force is the heart of Mad Heidi. While the film spends a considerable amount of time on her transformation, some viewers may feel that it delays the satisfaction of seeing her seek revenge. From the early minutes of the film, it becomes clear that Heidi’s ultimate arc will involve her taking on the cheese fascists (god, I wish there were a sequel that dealt with Bratzis!), but the wait for her to kick some serious butt can feel a tad too long. When I say a tad too long, I mean maybe 10 minutes not an entire act. Maybe the editing can get tighter and maybe, again, like Dien’s accent, this is part of the ride. Nevertheless, when the moment arrives, it’s a truly gratifying experience that makes up for the delay.
Advertisement
A Perfect Lazy Sunday Escape
Mad Heidi is the perfect film for a lazy Sunday evening when you’re in the mood for some mindless escapism. Its over-the-top characters, cheesy humor, and action-packed sequences allow you to switch off your brain and simply enjoy the ride. So gather your friends, grab some snacks and beers, and immerse yourself in the madness of Mad Heidi! You truly can’t miss with this film. It’s a great gem and you can thank me for it later.
Conclusion
Mad Heidi 2022 is a crowd-funded and independently made film that manages to captivate with its unique visual style and passionate storytelling. While it may have some noticeable visual flaws and the occasional accent slip-up, the film’s charm shines through. Heidi’s transformation from an innocent girl to a kick-ass fighter is a journey worth experiencing, even if it takes a bit longer than expected. So, if you’re in the mood for a fun and entertaining Swiss adventure, Mad Heidi is the film for you. Sit back, relax, and let the cheesy madness unfold before your eyes!
(4 / 5)
Want to snag a copy of the Swissploitation classic? Click on through!
To a lot of fans, this is the film that killed the franchise. It says a lot that the next installment is yet another retcon. Halloween VI: The Curse of Michael Myers attempts to explain Michael’s unrelenting evil, which lead to mixed opinions from longtime fans. There are two cuts of the film, theatrical vs producer’s. For a lot of people, the latter is the only one worth mentioning. Aiming to be as accurate as possible, I will be talking about the producer’s cut. Let’s begin!
Plot
We start Halloween VI with a six-year time jump from part five. Jamie is now barefoot and recently pregnant, running away from Michael as he wants her baby. While she manages to hide the little one away, Michael finally gets his hunger satiated by killing her. The moment is one of the most brutal ways in the franchise up until that point. Rest in peace, Jamie, you held your ground for as long as you could, the sequels were just too relentless.
The movie then cuts to a whole different scene going on. We have a new family living in the Myers house and their youngest child is hearing voices telling him to kill his loved ones. Tommy Lloyd is watching the family, played by none other than Paul Rudd in his first-ever theatrical role. Tommy still carries trauma from the events all those years ago when Laurie Strode was babysitting him. So when he finds Jamie’s baby, his part in the story becomes even more essential.
Advertisement
Dr Loomis also stars in what was Donald Pleasance’s final role before his passing. He and Tommy try to stop Michael once and for all before the cycle can repeat itself. As it turns out, Michael is a victim of a druid cult which makes him want to kill his family members every Halloween. Thorn, the cult in question, thinks they can control Michael and make him do their bidding. This results in catastrophe and Michael goes berzerk and kills all the cult members. Once again, it’s one of the most gruesome montages for the franchise up until that point.
Tommy and Kara are left to face Michael on their own which they manage to do with some corrosive liquid and good luck. However, nothing stays dead in this franchise as it’s soon revealed Michael somehow escaped and this time Dr Loomis might not be so lucky…
Overall thoughts
I would say for me personally Halloween VI definitely ranks somewhere near the bottom. The whole point of Michael is that there is no rhyme or reason to his killings and this film tries to go against that. I am glad the mistake was rectified by the upcoming installment. There were still some good things about it, such as Paul Rudd’s acting that reveals some raw talent as far as I’m concerned, as well as some direction choices and musical score. However, I also think it absolutely deserves all the criticism that it gets.
We’ve reached the final episode of American Horror Stories, season three. After the ups and downs of the season, I didn’t know what to expect. I felt that we were due a big finish, Killer Queens. But I feared we were in for a big letdown.
As it turns out, The Thing Under The Bed was neither.
The story
We begin our story with a little girl named Mary, who is scared of something under her bed. She sneaks out of her room, only to be caught by her father and sent back to sleep. And of course, there is something horrible waiting for her under her bed.
This scene cuts away to a woman named Jillian. She has strange dreams, including one about Mary. But her husband, Mark, doesn’t want to hear about it. He’s only interested in a little lovemaking because he wants a baby. Jillian doesn’t, which makes total sense because she’s already married to one. But her irritation with her childish husband goes away when he goes away. And by goes away, I mean he’s sloppily devoured by something vicious under their bed.
Advertisement
What worked
In short, this episode just worked. The acting was professional and believable. The cinematography and lighting work were wonderful, adding spooky effects and startling moments without impairing visibility.
Best of all, the story was solid. There were no plotholes to be found. Our main character, Jillian, was relatable and sympathetic.
This was maybe my favorite part of the story. I thought Jillian was a remarkably sympathetic character. She was dealt a hand she never asked for, having her husband slaughtered in their bedroom. I don’t think she missed him, so much as she was afraid of the legal ramifications of being caught with literal blood on her hands.
Then, when it would have been safest for her to just lay low and save up for a good defense attorney, she instead goes into unlikely hero mode. She does her best to save people, putting herself in legal and physical danger. It’s hard not to root for her.
It’s also a little hard not to root for the antagonist, too. I don’t want to ruin the twist for you, so I’m going to tread lightly here. But it’s great when you have an antagonist who might be off their rocker, but also maybe has a point.
Advertisement
What didn’t work
I can only really think of one complaint with this episode. And that is how frequently one character says the word Chickadee. And if you’ve seen the episode, you know what I am talking about.
I get it, he has a pet name for his daughter. It’s adorable. It’s meant to convey that the two of them have a healthy loving relationship and I get it. We all get it. Blind monks get it. But the fact remains that no parent on Earth calls their kid by their pet name every single time they speak an individual sentence to them. It was just too damn much.
All in all, this was a good episode. It was a classic story, turned on its head, told by professionals from start to finish. And I hope that if there is another season, we see more stories like this one. But after the efforts put into this season at large, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the last we see of American Horror Stories.
If you’ve watched enough short-form horror anthology shows, you’ll notice that some stories are mainstays. Each show seems to put on the same sort of episodes, with the occasional surprising storyline that we’ve never (or at least rarely) seen before.
Leprechaun was an example of a repeated story—the story of a greedy thief whose punishment far outweighs the crime.
The story
We begin our story in 1841, with a drunk man leaving the bar one late night. He’s distracted by something glowing at the end of the well. When he reaches down for the glowing thing, he falls in. Moments later, he screams.
We then cut to the modern day. The well is still there, and now it’s surrounded by a dying town. In this town lives a young man named Colin. He’s married, his wife is pregnant, and he’s out of work. Like many of his friends.
Advertisement
Desperate for cash, Colin and his friends decide to rob a bank. They put together an Equate version of Ocean’s Eleven, and break in one night. But, of course, they find that the gold is nothing more than bait. And the creature waiting for them is something they never expected.
What worked
The first thing I want to point out is how real this episode felt. At least to anyone currently living in the same small town they grew up in. These characters felt like guys I went to school with. Guys I would see at the bar.
I appreciated the real anger and frustration these characters are feeling. Especially Colin. He’s bitter, and maybe he has a right to be. He did exactly what he was supposed to do to succeed. He went to school and invested in his career, and yet now he’s out of work and struggling to support his family. I probably don’t need to tell you how that feels. Because of this, we can all kind of understand why he was tempted to rob a bank.
I also want to talk about the fact that this was, as I said, an often-explored story. That can be a bad thing, but it can also be a good thing. This story is told over and over because it’s a good story. A relatable story. And there’s nothing wrong with that.
What didn’t work
That being said, this version didn’t try to do much to break out of the mold.
Because we have seen this story so many times, most of us could tell the story themselves. I would have expected something new, or some twist. But, in the end, the story didn’t bring anything new to the discussion.
Advertisement
Maybe because of this, the ending left a lot to be desired. Trapped in the basement of the bank, everyone just sort of stares at everyone else, until the thieves give up. And that’s it. The ending wasn’t scary, shocking, or funny. It was just sad, on multiple levels.
Overall, this was an okay story. It was entertaining, if not surprising. I would compare this episode to homemade macaroni and cheese. Everyone’s got their own version, they’re all pretty good, and none of them are exciting.
There’s just one episode left in this season of American Horror Stories. Let’s hope they’ve saved the best for last.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.