Connect with us

Published

on

Practically speaking, Mick Jackson’s Threads is not a horror movie, but many (including myself) would say it’s at least on the outskirts of the genre. While many remember the Cold War as a series of scares and propaganda triumphs (such as the fall of the Berlin Wall), “Threads” reminds us what an apocalyptic hellscape would be like. And, although the movie is dark and depressing, it’s also oddly refreshing to see an apocalyptic scenario without things like zombies, cyborgs, vampires, or god knows what else, making it a bit more “fun” for viewers. I think sometimes we need to get a glimpse of horror without the silly tropes (though let’s be real, some aspects of films even like The People Under the Stairs actually could happen, as unseemly as they appear).

Now, obviously, real life is also letting us view such scenarios, with Russia’s current attack on Ukraine, as well as other wars and assorted hellscapes created over the years (in the name of progress, freedom, and peace). So reality itself is reminding us what horror looks like, too, and it feels a bit odd talking about a film being scary when you can already see horrifying scenes on the news. So, with this kind of factual backdrop, how can one view a movie like Threads?

Does it merely distract from real issues, as we might accuse sillier films of doing? Is it even appropriate to focus attention on fictional depictions of deadly attacks, or is it a pathetic distraction? Personally, I think these are odd, specialized issues that pop culture writers don’t often seem to address, and I hope to be a bit sensitive to them as I proceed (though not so over-sensitive that I completely de-value powerful films such as these).

What “Threads” Can Tell Us About Today’s World

Honestly, Threads is one of those movies that I didn’t feel as much as I perhaps should have, and I don’t think I can fully convey why. Perhaps more horrifying than the movie is the fact that, for the most part, it didn’t really move me. I know it has impacted others, and they recount it as being among the scariest movies they have seen. However, it just didn’t rile me up or have me recoiled in fear. That’s when I realized I was simply feeling jaded with a lot of these apocalyptic scenarios. I was desensitized.

Advertisement

Now, obviously, that makes my intake of TV shows and films look bad, but I actually still think those would be a scapegoat. I also generally don’t feel comfortable pinning so much blame on the arts and entertainment. After all, a movie like Threads never really invented the problems it depicts. It only highlights them. The fact that I felt jaded likely has more to do with the broader life circumstances.

As I watched Threads, I am guessing I was thinking, “Well, we won’t be able to entertain or talk our way out of this situation.” And that is exactly the problem with authoritarianism and the dangers of nuclear weapons. After so many decades of being bombarded with all of this pro-war propaganda and artificially inflated scandals, it only makes sense to hit the snooze alarm every so often. At the very least, the non-stop panic alarm gets old, annoying, clichéd, and possibly even stops serving its purpose anymore, much like a car alarm that people ignore. Rather than spring to the vehicle or the motorists’ aid, many think “Man, that’s annoying!”

The Good Things About “Threads”

If you can’t tell, this is by no means a conventional movie review. In fact, I’ll merely mention the main actors’ names here: Karen Meagher, Reece Dinsdale, and David Brierly. That name-dropping out of the way, I might as well discuss some aspects of Threads that I remember appreciating. To begin with, I appreciate that the main characters are all quite detached from the political aspects of nuclear conflagration. There is a confluence of forces that they have little control over, do not fully understand, and wish to ignore. And who could blame them?

Also, in an odd sort of way, I felt out of place watching the whole thing. I live in (and, to some extent, with) the United States, not Britain. So there was already some comfortable distance between myself and the characters and events immediately depicted in the film. However, one thing becomes crystal clear: The social or political positions of the characters would no longer matter after the nuclear bombs go off.

That’s very similar to how it would be in the United States. There would be reduced interest in “Red States” vs. “Blue States” or petty debates in Washington. Would the Central Intelligence Agency even matter, by a certain point, if the mushroom clouds were large enough? And, on that note, if you watch Threads, I urge you to also watch real footage of various nuclear tests, maybe try to remember the cute little codenames. Also, remember how childish the arms race was, with the USSR’s launch of Sputnik inspiring the US to intensify its own efforts to build up its war technology. Also, it should be mentioned that a nuclear attack on the Soviet Union would have been just as devastating as one inflicted by them.

Advertisement

Could a Nuclear Conflagration Lead to Fun?

Obviously, we may look back upon the Cold War “for historical reasons”, but that’s not all. We can still find some relic ideas from that era prominently displayed today. But, again, it’s fortunate that “Threads” dared to strip out the entertainment aspects, just leaving us with the horror. Obviously, a spy aspect would prove attractive to filmmakers and moviegoers, but not every movie or TV show has to be attractive, and not everything should.

That being said, there’s still nothing wrong with looking at art that makes the apocalypse more palatable. After all, humor would become a struggle once such an event occurs…and that pretty much does seem inevitable at some point. But by all means, if the proverbial phoenix can occasionally rise from the nuclear ashes and wink at the camera, we might as well let it. Tragicomedy has its place, too.

What are your thoughts on Threads? Let us know in the comments!

Advertisement

Movies n TV

Smile 2: A Poor Rate Second.

“Break a leg out there.”

Published

on

Smile 2, a psychological supernatural horror, released in October 2024 just in time for Halloween, sees director Parker Finn (Smile, Laura Hasn’t Slept) return with a sequel starring Naomi Scott (Aladdin) as pop star and recovering addict Skye Riley. While Smile 2 boasts a talented cast, it ultimately falls short of its predecessor, offering a familiar storyline with minor variations and a predictable finale. The film attempts to introduce a new method to combat the parasitic ‘Smile Entity’, but this addition fails to elevate the sequel beyond a pale imitation of its chilling predecessor.

The Plot.

Smile 2 begins shortly after the end of the original; just six days after Rose Cotter’s death. During a short interlude scene, we watch as the now cursed Joel attempts to pass the Smile Entity on by killing one criminal in front of another. The plan backfires spectacularly, inadvertently passing the curse onto an innocent bystander named Lewis Fregoli.


The film then shifts gears, introducing Skye Riley, a singer and performer making a triumphant return to the spotlight with a comeback tour after a tumultuous past. During a candid interview on the Drew Barrymore Show, Skye opens up about her struggles with addiction and the devastating loss of her boyfriend in a car accident. Her sobriety journey, however, faces a severe setback when she seeks pain relief from her old high school friend, the unwitting Lewis Fregoli. In a chilling turn of events, Lewis takes his own life while Skye watches, passing the Smile Entity onto her.
Unaware of her new cursed existence Skye gets on with rehearsing for her tour, but she begins to notice that strange things are happening. People are smiling at her in an unnatural way and she becomes the target of anonymous attacks and aggressions. When text messages begin to arrive from an unknown number, Skye decides to get some answers.

Highlights.

Let’s not beat about the bush. I found Smile 2 difficult to finish and was struggling at about the hour-and-a-half mark to stay awake. That being said it’s worth watching because everyone needs to see the 3-minute scene of the ‘smilers’ chasing Skye through her apartment. This was possibly the creepiest thing I’ve seen on a screen.  The buildup, the synchronicity of the movement of the actors and their positioning, the camera work, and the lighting. I have rewatched it several times and it doesn’t get old. If you are only interested in watching this, fast forward to the 123-minute mark and get ready to be impressed.

Drawbacks.

Where do I start?

My primary concern with Smile 2 is its striking resemblance to its predecessor. The narrative follows a familiar pattern: an attractive woman fleeing a supernatural force, grappling with hallucinations, experiencing a mental health decline, and culminating in the revelation someone close to Skye was the Smiling Entity after all. This repetitive structure diminishes the film’s impact.

Advertisement

While the introduction of a new method for shedding the entity initially offered a glimmer of hope this concept wasn’t fully realized. It just served to add names to the line of people that the entity has infected in the past.

Furthermore, the film’s pacing suffers from excessive focus on Skye’s musical career. Scenes showcasing her stage rehearsals and music videos, while intended to establish her identity as a performer, feel unnecessary and detract from the narrative momentum. Yes, we understand she’s a performer, you told us, you don’t need to prove it. These scenes appear to artificially inflate the film’s runtime, suggesting a lack of confidence in the core story.

The Final Take.

Ultimately, Smile 2 fails to expand upon the established lore of the franchise. The film’s conclusion feels contrived, with a blatant setup for a third installment. Hopefully, if a ‘Smile 3’ is inevitable, the creative team will bring fresh ideas and avoid simply retreading familiar ground.

2 out of 5 stars (2 / 5)

Both Cthulhu’s granted for that one scene.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Goosebumps, Stay Out Of The Basement Pt 2, could have just been one part

Published

on

We’re back again with Goosebumps The Vanishing, episode two. A story too big for one episode, apparently.

Or, maybe this is just a nod to the fact that Stay Out Of The Basement was a two-part episode in the original 1995 show. Either way, after seeing this episode, we could have kept it to one.

The story

We begin this second episode with Anthony investigating the parasitic plant taking over his body. Rather than, I don’t know, going to the hospital, he’s decided to phone a colleague and send her some samples from the bulb he pulls out of his arm with a handheld garden trowel.

David Schwimmer in Goosebumps The Vanishing.

Meanwhile, Devin is having his own worries. He’s haunted by what he saw in the sewers. So, he gets CJ to go with him to investigate. What they find is more of the tendrils of the plant that dragged him down through the manhole last episode.

Advertisement

I sure would have liked to see more about that.

Instead, we see Devin pivot to flirting with a newly single Frankie. Because teenage hormones I guess.

Meanwhile, Trey is having a terrible day. First, his girlfriend leaves him. Then, Anthony breaks his car window.

Needing a way to deal with his frustration, Trey decides to break into the Brewers’ basement. There, he starts wrecking up the place. Until he meets the plant creature and has an unfortunate accident.

What worked

The big difference between this episode and the last is the increased gross-out factor. This episode had some straight-up cringy moments. From the tendrils waiving from Anthony’s arm to the whole goat he brings home to feed his new pet, this episode was skin-crawling gross in the best way possible.

Advertisement

The series is called Goosebumps, after all.

What didn’t work

Unfortunately, that’s where my praise ends. This episode, unlike the last, just wasn’t that great.

To start with, there was a lot of unnecessary drama between characters who are not in danger of being eaten by a plant from the inside out.

 Francesca Noel in Goosebumps The Vanishing.

I especially disliked the focus on the Frankie/Trey/Devin love triangle.

Now, I don’t hate it. This part of the story adds extra emotional depth to the show. We can see why Trey would be especially incensed by his girlfriend falling for the son of the neighbor he’s feuding with. But it would be more enjoyable if it wasn’t so cliche and dramatic.

Advertisement

I hate the way Trey tried to gaslight Frankie. It makes me dislike him when he should be a sympathetic character. I hate how whiny Devin is every time he talks to Frankie. And I hated the impassioned speech Frankie gives after Devin asks her why she was with Trey.

Listen, I understand what we’re going for here. Devin and Cece are not struggling financially. They’re doing alright, and their new friends here in Gravesend are not. We kind of got that without Frankie claiming that her socioeconomic status is why she’s dating a bully and gaslighter. It felt out of place. It felt like pandering. It certainly didn’t feel like something an eighteen-year-old would say. I hated it.

Finally, there was a moment near the end of the episode that irritated me. I don’t want to give too much detail because I wouldn’t dare ruin an R.L. Stine cliffhanger. But, well, it doesn’t make a lot of sense.

I get that we’re watching a show about a carnivorous plant that is going to wreak havoc on this family and neighborhood. I understand the suspension of disbelief. Some might even say I am a little too generous with it. So I can buy into a teenager being absorbed by a plant and turned into a monstrous version of himself.

I can’t buy into what happens at the end of this episode. It doesn’t make sense with the rules established. It certainly doesn’t make any sort of scientific or logical sense. It is a lazy moment meant to further the storyline but threatens the structural integrity of the season.

Advertisement

All in all, this wasn’t the best episode of Goosebumps. But it’s only the second episode. Honestly, the season has plenty of time to go either way.

2.5 out of 5 stars (2.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Thriller Nite, Poem by Jennifer Weigel Plus

Published

on

So, this is a convoluted post, not going to lie. Because it’s Thriller Nite. And we have to kick it off with a link to Michael Jackson in homage, because he’s the bomb and Vincent Price is the master… (If the following video doesn’t load properly, you can get there from this link.)

The movie monsters always approach so slowly.
Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements
While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream.
It takes forever for them to catch their victims.
 
Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements
As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry –
It takes forever for them to catch their victims.
And yet no one ever seems to get away.
 
As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry –
Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly…
And yet no one ever seems to get away.
Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it?
 
Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly…
While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream.
Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it?
The movie monsters always approach so slowly.

Robot Dance found subverted street art altered photography from Jennifer Weigel's Reversals series
Robot Dance from Jennifer Weigel’s Reversals series

So my father used to enjoy telling the story of Thriller Nite and how he’d scare his little sister, my aunt. One time they were watching the old Universal Studios Monsters version of The Mummy, and he pursued her at a snail’s pace down the hallway in Boris Karloff fashion. Both of them had drastically different versions of this tale, but essentially it was a true Thriller Nite moment. And the inspiration for this poem.

For more fun music video mayhem, check out She Wolf here on Haunted MTL. And feel free to check out more of Jennifer Weigel’s work here on Haunted MTL or here on her website.

Portrait of myself with dark makeup and crow skull headdress, backlit by the sun.
Portrait of myself with dark makeup and crow skull headdress, backlit by the sun.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending