Painting Dorian Gray, a Review by Jennifer Weigel
The Picture of Dorian Gray is a Classic neo-Gothic literary novel that has been revived and revisited in so many homages, from literature to music to film to pop culture. But how immortal is the original book by Oscar Wilde, really?
I am not going to go into great depths as far as the plot or go into details in case you want to read the book for yourself, but I will provide some insights into the scene and setup. Dorian Gray is a young socialite rising to status. He is incredibly handsome and his boyish good looks are interpreted throughout the book as signs of a pure, untarnished soul.
The story opens with artist Basil Hallward having painted a splendid portrait of Dorian Gray which piques Lord Henry Watton’s interest. Over time, both men become very close to Dorian Gray and, as his two closest friends, pull him in very different directions like shoulder morality guides, with Basil playing the Angel and Lord Henry playing the Devil more or less. Upon contemplating something that Lord Henry has insinuated, Dorian wishes for the portrait to age rather than his actual person, and his wish is mysteriously granted to both good and bad outcome. This creates opportunity within the novel to consider what one could or would do if never perceived to do wrong nor required to answer for one’s actions. The story is much more nuanced and involved than this, but I don’t want to spoil it so I will leave it at that.
What I liked most about The Picture of Dorian Gray were the conversational aspects of the relationships as they develop between the main characters and their respective friendships. There is action, but there is also a lot of talk of what that means, speculating both moral responsibilities and deepest desires. The book provides many philosophical points to ponder art, success, wealth, life, and what it means to truly live. It is eloquently written and provides interesting insights into Victorian culture and a glimpse behind the rigid curtain of propriety of the era.
However, the book is very much a product of its time, and there are many reminders of how much has changed since then. Some of the base, carnal desires as expressed have become more accepted by more people than they were then. The idea that the surface conveys the soul within as pure or corrupt is also a bit dated, though a lot of that depends on how this is said to manifest and who you ask.
Based upon these factors, I will give the book 3.5 Cthulus.
(3.5 / 5)
Note: If you need intense high action drama, cut scenes, high speed car chases, explosions and the like, The Picture of Dorian Gray will likely come across as long, dry and painstakingly slow (undoubtedly not unlike my review of it). But in my mind, the story is well worth reading to get a sense of its own history and cult status. It is rather immortal as we continue to come back to the tale time and again within other stories and references, reconsidering the story in new and subtle ways through all kinds of different media. As it evolves, each iteration speaks tomes about the moral leanings and perceived roles of art and high society in their day.
Moreover, it is impossible to read The Picture of Dorian Gray without reflecting upon Oscar Wilde’s life and challenges he faced, especially having been bankrupted, charged, found guilty, and sentenced to prison for engaging in homosexual acts. Public opinion has shifted drastically since the time of Dorian Gray, but sadly we must remember that this really wasn’t as long ago nor as far away as we might wish it to be. So much has changed in the past 150 years; let us see what the next 150 will bring and how this story regenerates and is reborn to return anew.
You can enjoy some more literary greats I have responded to in my previous posts celebrating Classic poems and Emily Dickinson in particular.
Book Reviews
What Feasts at Night: An amble through Romanian folklore.
“Salt on the floor, threads on the walls, and iron under the pillow.”
Sword Soldier 2: What Feasts at Night, a review.
Published in February 2024, What Feasts at Night is the second book in T. Kingfisher’s Sworn Soldier duology. If you’re curious, you can find my review of the first installment, What Moves the Dead – a chilling reimagining of Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher – here.
What Feasts at Night into Romanian folklore, weaving a tale that grapples with PTSD and the enduring impact of trauma, or what our main character calls ‘soldier’s heart’.
The Plot.
In What Feasts at Night, Alex Easton returns from his unsettling encounter with the Ushers and sets his sights on a quiet retreat to his Galacian cottage. Accompanied by his loyal companion, Angus, and his faithful steed Hob, he arrives to find the caretaker mysteriously deceased and the local villagers shrouded in fear and silence. Undeterred, Alex presses on, enlisting the aid of the superstitious Widow Botezatu to prepare his home for the arrival of his friend, Eugenia Potter.
As the story moves forward, the tranquility of the cottage is disrupted, and a sinister presence begins to cast its shadow. The Widow Botezatu’s son, Bors, begins to exhibit the same disturbing symptoms that the deceased caretakers suffered through. According to his mother, these symptoms align with the terrifying legend of the moroi.
Highlights.
Including the traditional Romanian folklore was a real highlight of this story. This is not limited to the presence of the shape-shifting, nocturnal moroi. Kingfisher has also included various superstitions from this region believed to ward off evil, such as weaving red thread and placing knives beneath pillows.
As a sworn soldier, Alex Easton has played his part in many wars. Kingfisher mentioned ‘soldier’s heart’ briefly in What Moves the Dead, in this installation we are able to see how this trauma response affects Alex. There is a beautiful insight into trauma that should not be left out of any review of this book.
“I sometimes think the fundamental disconnect with civilians is that they think the war is an event, something neatly bound on either end by dates. What anyone who’s lived through one can tell you is it’s actually a place. You’re there and then you leave, but places don’t stop existing just because you aren’t looking at them. The war’s still there. I don’t live in it anymore, but it’s right over there, just on the other side of… I don’t know.” (87)
Drawbacks.
In comparison with the first installment of this series, What Feasts at Night lacked peaks and troughs, feeling like a slow and steady amble to the final scenes. Although Kingfisher manages to pack her pages with atmosphere and a sense of foreboding, there is a lack of solid action here until the last few pages of the story. For those who enjoy a slow burn, this will not necessarily be a drawback, but I have grown to expect a certain level of movement from Kingfisher’s stories and found it was missing here.
The Final Take.
My love of T Kingfisher is no secret. I find her stories engaging, atmospheric and generally a little brain bending. However, What Feasts in the Night is perhaps my least favourite of those I have read. The plot was a little slow and the characters lack luster. I did still enjoy this story, in particular Kingfishers take on PTSD. I cannot say that this is an original idea but traumatic experience as a place rather than a time period is one that really makes sense to me.
There are whispers that suggest this series might grow into a trilogy next year. I, for one, am looking forward to seeing what kind of trouble Alex Easton gets into next.
(3 / 5)
Book Reviews
What Moves the Dead gives depth to Poe’s most famous tale.
“The dead don’t walk. Except, sometimes, when they do.”
The first of T. Kingfisher’s Sworn Soldier duology, What Moves the Dead was published in July 2022. Shortly after the novella won the 2023 Locus Award for Best Horror Novel and was nominated for the 2023 Hugo Award for Best Novella, this story is Kingfisher’s version of Edgar Allan Poe’s ‘The Fall of the House of Usher’. It offers depth and insight into the original characters and plot of Poe’s short story.
The Plot.
What Moves the Dead is a modern reimagining of Edgar Allan Poe’s classic tale, “The Fall of the House of Usher.”
The story follows Alex Easton, a sworn soldier who receives a disturbing letter from the sister of his childhood friend. Summoned to the isolated Usher mansion, Alex finds the once-grand house in a state of decay. This mirrors the deteriorating health of its inhabitants, Roderick and his twin sister, Madeline.
As Alex delves deeper into the unsettling atmosphere of the mansion, he encounters a series of inexplicable occurrences. Strange noises echo through the halls, eerie lights flicker in the darkness, and wildlife in the surrounding environment does not act as it should. As Madeline’s condition worsens, Alex begins to question the nature of the mysterious illness afflicting the family. Is it a physical malady, or something far more sinister?
Highlights.
Although What Moves the Dead follows the same storyline as ‘The Fall of the House of Usher’, Kingfisher’s version has the advantage of length. As she says in her author’s note, Poe’s story is just too short. Kingfisher names previously unnamed characters and provides them with more complete personalities. We get dialogue from Madeline and the doctor which offers answers and reasoning for the mysterious illness that the Usher twins are suffering from.
What Moves the Dead also provides a much more thorough description of the house and the surrounding natural environment. This becomes important in the identification of the Usher’s illness. We are also gifted an extra character, one Miss Potter, who definitively identifies herself as the aunt of the great Beatrix Potter who was known to be interested in mycology- the study of fungi.
Drawbacks.
In Kingfisher’s fictional country,Ruritania, the local language uses over 7 pronouns (ta, tha, than, var, ka, kan, va, van). Some of these are used only for sworn soldiers, others as a gender-neutral way to refer to children. A lot of time is spent explaining these and the reasoning behind each. I enjoyed reading this, but then was disappointed when none of these pronouns were really used in the book itself. The time that Kingfisher spent setting this up, I thought it would be a larger part of the story, but it had no bearing on the story at all.
The Final Take.
Is it wrong to consider a retelling or adaptation superior to a classic? I don’t have an answer for that. However, Kingfisher had gone above and beyond Poe’s original story, providing depth and insight where Poe only left questions. I will never eat mushrooms (in particular the long thready Enoki mushroom) again with complete peace of mind. I look forward to reviewing the second book in this series, What Feasts at Night.
(4 / 5)
-
Book Reviews7 days agoWhat Feasts at Night: An amble through Romanian folklore.
-
Movies n TV6 days agoFreak Out, a Rocky Horror Memoir by Jennifer Weigel
-
Movies n TV5 days ago
Dexter lives in Original Sin, And In the Beginning
-
Book Reviews5 days agoDepression + Apocalype = ?: This Is Not a Test Book Review
