Connect with us

Published

on

2017’s The Babysitter is one of my favorite movies. A lot of people like trashing it but I have no shame in my love for it. It’s a witty, slumber party slasher and I was thrilled when they announced a sequel with the original cast. The Babysitter: Killer Queen! Cole Johnson a.k.a the Channing Tatum of murder (an actual quote from the film) returns to once again battle the Satanic cult that terrorized him years before. However, where The Babysitter was a clever horror-comedy, Killer Queen is a dumbed-down guilty pleasure. Not a bad one though.

Like most sequels, Killer Queen is nothing special. It’s got a clunky beginning, somewhat boring CGI kills, a weak ending, and a few poorly developed plot twists yet, it is remarkably self-aware. It knows that it’s not better than the original and embraces it, dives headfirst into the weird without bothering to second guess whether such a decision is a good idea or a bad one but like it’s predecessor, it has a unique wit.

By the way, if it feels like director McG sounds familiar but you can’t pinpoint the name, he’s the same McG that appears under the title “Executive Producer” for every single episode in every season of Supernatural.

[Major spoilers!] The Babysitter: Killer Queen picks up two years after the events of the first film and Cole is about as well off as he was before. He’s made the same mistake that a lot of horror movie survivors make which is tell people what they’ve experienced. Big surprise, no one believes him. They all think he suffered a psychotic break, so when he finds out that his parents are planning to commit him to a psychiatric school for troubled teens, his neighbor/best friend Melanie talks him into skipping school to hang out with friends at a lake party. Just when Cole thinks that things are finally starting to look up, the lake becomes the setting for yet another bloodbath.

As I said, the sequel has a clunky beginning. This is likely a result of Samara Weaving’s absence. The Babysitter used her relationship with Cole to jump-start the plot, but she’s no longer around so the sequel has to find another way to introduce the story that’s more or less the same. A few extra ingredients have been added but it’s basically the same story, only wackier. The character of Melanie, once again played by Emily Alyn Lind, serves as Weaving’s replacement but she is a pale stand-in.

Advertisement

In the Horror Queers podcast episode for I Know Who Killed Me, one of the hosts described a character as white bread without a crust and that’s how I see Melanie. She’s white bread, no crust, that tries to evil itself up with some almond butter spread. She has her own demon team to add to the mix but they too are very forgettable and die very quickly after having very little screentime.

At the party, Melanie reveals herself to be a member of the same cult from the first film and brings back Max, John, Sonya, and Allison, the original group of devil worshippers from the grave. It’s only when they arrive that the film starts to pick up. By the way, if you’re like me and loved the dynamic between Max and Cole from the first film, then you’ll be happy to know that none of that has changed. Max, forever shirtless, continues fanboying over Cole whilst he’s trying to kill him. Taking the time to shout out how much he missed him before running after him with an ax. Talk about a complicated friendship. Someone give me a spin-off of Max vs. Cole. I’d watch the s**t out of that.

Meanwhile, there’s a new girl in town named Phoebe (Jenna Ortega) who comes in to shake things up. Or she tries to. She’s brought in as a love interest for Cole that shares a connection to the cult but because the bulk of the film takes place within a single night, their relationship falls flat. The only real shake-up is the return of Samara Weaving who reprises her character of Bee as part of the grand finale. The film holds up fine without her but her surprise appearance is one of the better parts of the movie.

Randy Meeks was right. Sequels are indeed bloodier and this is no exception even if it’s very tame in its execution. Nothing about The Babysitter: Killer Queen is scary or disturbing. It’s just funny. 3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

All photos are property of Netflix and Wonderland Sound and Vision

Advertisement

Rachel Roth is a writer who lives in South Florida. She has a degree in Writing Studies and a Certificate in Creative Writing, her work has appeared in several literary journals and anthologies. @WinterGreenRoth

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

Low point or a daring experiment? Halloween VI (1995) Review

Published

on

To a lot of fans, this is the film that killed the franchise. It says a lot that the next installment is yet another retcon. Halloween VI: The Curse of Michael Myers attempts to explain Michael’s unrelenting evil, which lead to mixed opinions from longtime fans. There are two cuts of the film, theatrical vs producer’s. For a lot of people, the latter is the only one worth mentioning. Aiming to be as accurate as possible, I will be talking about the producer’s cut. Let’s begin! 

Plot

We start Halloween VI with a six-year time jump from part five. Jamie is now barefoot and recently pregnant, running away from Michael as he wants her baby. While she manages to hide the little one away, Michael finally gets his hunger satiated by killing her. The moment is one of the most brutal ways in the franchise up until that point. Rest in peace, Jamie, you held your ground for as long as you could, the sequels were just too relentless. 

The movie then cuts to a whole different scene going on. We have a new family living in the Myers house and their youngest child is hearing voices telling him to kill his loved ones. Tommy Lloyd is watching the family, played by none other than Paul Rudd in his first-ever theatrical role. Tommy still carries trauma from the events all those years ago when Laurie Strode was babysitting him. So when he finds Jamie’s baby, his part in the story becomes even more essential. 

Advertisement

Dr Loomis also stars in what was Donald Pleasance’s final role before his passing. He and Tommy try to stop Michael once and for all before the cycle can repeat itself. As it turns out, Michael is a victim of a druid cult which makes him want to kill his family members every Halloween. Thorn, the cult in question, thinks they can control Michael and make him do their bidding. This results in catastrophe and Michael goes berzerk and kills all the cult members. Once again, it’s one of the most gruesome montages for the franchise up until that point.  

Tommy and Kara are left to face Michael on their own which they manage to do with some corrosive liquid and good luck. However, nothing stays dead in this franchise as it’s soon revealed Michael somehow escaped and this time Dr Loomis might not be so lucky… 

Overall thoughts

I would say for me personally Halloween VI definitely ranks somewhere near the bottom. The whole point of Michael is that there is no rhyme or reason to his killings and this film tries to go against that. I am glad the mistake was rectified by the upcoming installment. There were still some good things about it, such as Paul Rudd’s acting that reveals some raw talent as far as I’m concerned, as well as some direction choices and musical score. However, I also think it absolutely deserves all the criticism that it gets. 

Advertisement
2.5 out of 5 stars (2.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

American Horror Stories, The Thing Under The Bed

Published

on

We’ve reached the final episode of American Horror Stories, season three. After the ups and downs of the season, I didn’t know what to expect. I felt that we were due a big finish, Killer Queens. But I feared we were in for a big letdown.

As it turns out, The Thing Under The Bed was neither.

The story

We begin our story with a little girl named Mary, who is scared of something under her bed. She sneaks out of her room, only to be caught by her father and sent back to sleep. And of course, there is something horrible waiting for her under her bed.

Debby Ryan in American Horror Stories.

This scene cuts away to a woman named Jillian. She has strange dreams, including one about Mary. But her husband, Mark, doesn’t want to hear about it. He’s only interested in a little lovemaking because he wants a baby. Jillian doesn’t, which makes total sense because she’s already married to one. But her irritation with her childish husband goes away when he goes away. And by goes away, I mean he’s sloppily devoured by something vicious under their bed.

Advertisement

What worked

In short, this episode just worked. The acting was professional and believable. The cinematography and lighting work were wonderful, adding spooky effects and startling moments without impairing visibility.

Best of all, the story was solid. There were no plotholes to be found. Our main character, Jillian, was relatable and sympathetic.

This was maybe my favorite part of the story. I thought Jillian was a remarkably sympathetic character. She was dealt a hand she never asked for, having her husband slaughtered in their bedroom. I don’t think she missed him, so much as she was afraid of the legal ramifications of being caught with literal blood on her hands.

Then, when it would have been safest for her to just lay low and save up for a good defense attorney, she instead goes into unlikely hero mode. She does her best to save people, putting herself in legal and physical danger. It’s hard not to root for her.

It’s also a little hard not to root for the antagonist, too. I don’t want to ruin the twist for you, so I’m going to tread lightly here. But it’s great when you have an antagonist who might be off their rocker, but also maybe has a point.

Advertisement

What didn’t work

I can only really think of one complaint with this episode. And that is how frequently one character says the word Chickadee. And if you’ve seen the episode, you know what I am talking about.

I get it, he has a pet name for his daughter. It’s adorable. It’s meant to convey that the two of them have a healthy loving relationship and I get it. We all get it. Blind monks get it. But the fact remains that no parent on Earth calls their kid by their pet name every single time they speak an individual sentence to them. It was just too damn much.

All in all, this was a good episode. It was a classic story, turned on its head, told by professionals from start to finish. And I hope that if there is another season, we see more stories like this one. But after the efforts put into this season at large, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the last we see of American Horror Stories.

4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies n TV

American Horror Stories, Leprechaun

Published

on

If you’ve watched enough short-form horror anthology shows, you’ll notice that some stories are mainstays. Each show seems to put on the same sort of episodes, with the occasional surprising storyline that we’ve never (or at least rarely) seen before.

Leprechaun was an example of a repeated story—the story of a greedy thief whose punishment far outweighs the crime.

The story

We begin our story in 1841, with a drunk man leaving the bar one late night. He’s distracted by something glowing at the end of the well. When he reaches down for the glowing thing, he falls in. Moments later, he screams.

We then cut to the modern day. The well is still there, and now it’s surrounded by a dying town. In this town lives a young man named Colin. He’s married, his wife is pregnant, and he’s out of work. Like many of his friends.

Advertisement
Hudson Oz in American Horror Stories Leprechaun.

Desperate for cash, Colin and his friends decide to rob a bank. They put together an Equate version of Ocean’s Eleven, and break in one night. But, of course, they find that the gold is nothing more than bait. And the creature waiting for them is something they never expected.

What worked

The first thing I want to point out is how real this episode felt. At least to anyone currently living in the same small town they grew up in. These characters felt like guys I went to school with. Guys I would see at the bar.

I appreciated the real anger and frustration these characters are feeling. Especially Colin. He’s bitter, and maybe he has a right to be. He did exactly what he was supposed to do to succeed. He went to school and invested in his career, and yet now he’s out of work and struggling to support his family. I probably don’t need to tell you how that feels. Because of this, we can all kind of understand why he was tempted to rob a bank.

I also want to talk about the fact that this was, as I said, an often-explored story. That can be a bad thing, but it can also be a good thing. This story is told over and over because it’s a good story. A relatable story. And there’s nothing wrong with that.

What didn’t work

That being said, this version didn’t try to do much to break out of the mold.

Because we have seen this story so many times, most of us could tell the story themselves. I would have expected something new, or some twist. But, in the end, the story didn’t bring anything new to the discussion.

Advertisement

Maybe because of this, the ending left a lot to be desired. Trapped in the basement of the bank, everyone just sort of stares at everyone else, until the thieves give up. And that’s it. The ending wasn’t scary, shocking, or funny. It was just sad, on multiple levels.

Overall, this was an okay story. It was entertaining, if not surprising. I would compare this episode to homemade macaroni and cheese. Everyone’s got their own version, they’re all pretty good, and none of them are exciting.

There’s just one episode left in this season of American Horror Stories. Let’s hope they’ve saved the best for last.

3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending