Connect with us

Published

on

For those who haven’t seen it yet, the fourth episode of American Horror Story Delicate was an experience. In true American Horror Story fashion, it left me almost speechless.

Almost. Clearly, I found at least a few things to say about it, Killer Queens.

The Story

We begin this episode with a classic American Horror Story flashback. We see a queen just after labor, with a baby she says is a monster. This monster is collected by two familiar faces, who curse the queen’s sister with barrenness before leaving both women screaming in the birth chamber.

Back in the present, Siobhan is worried about Anna’s image. So she brings in two image consultants, Ashley and Ashleigh. We saw them earlier in the episode as well. In the birth chamber.

Advertisement
Leslie Grossman and Billie Lourd in American Horror Story Delicate.

But Anna’s image isn’t the only thing she’s worried about. Her mother-in-law has invaded their New York apartment. She’s been staying there. And she isn’t there to support her son and daughter-in-law through their miscarriage. No, she wants Dex’s help suing her ex-husband. Because she believes that, wait for it, he Satanically abused her. And she only knows about it now because of repressed memory therapy.

So, you know, she’s suing him. She’s also not exactly thrilled with the idea of Anna having a baby, referring to a baby as an accessory.

She said this to her son. Her baby.

Too bad she isn’t on board, because it turns out that Anna was right. She is still pregnant. After browbeating Dex and Dr. Hill, she’s finally given another sonogram. And there it is, a heartbeat.

By the way, yes vanishing twin syndrome is a thing.

But is it the beat of a human child’s heart? I don’t think we can safely assume that.

Advertisement

What Worked

Let’s start with Dex’s mom, Virginia, played by Debra Monk. She is frankly everyone’s worst idea of a mother-in-law. And in interacting with her, we finally see Dex stand up for Anna a little bit. We see a side of him that is, if not exactly likable, sympathetic. I feel bad for him. He was never shown what a healthy relationship looked like in his childhood. And his mother’s still dragging him into her twisted drama as an adult.

I still don’t like him.

Matt Czuchry in American Horror Story Delicate.

Then, there was that cringy my body reel. This was done perfectly. The video comes off as unrealistic, inauthentic, and gross. Every woman included in this video celebrating women’s bodies was thin, beautiful, and cisgender. The whole thing came off TERF’y in my opinion.

That was the point! It was supposed to be gross, exploitative bullshit because it’s another example of how Anna still isn’t allowed to make her own decisions about her body and how she’s represented. It’s also a perfect parody of how modern society pretends to care about women’s issues while having only the barest idea of what those issues might be.

It’s almost as bad as giving a Pepsi to a cop during a protest and stopping racism. Who would agree to do an ad like that?

Also, I don’t know if Ashley and Ashleigh are supposed to be a reference to the Ashleys from Recess, but I can hope.

Advertisement
A still from Disney's Recess.

Finally, let’s talk about the gross-out factor in this episode. Because it was strong! We’ve seen a lot of blood this season, which is fine. But the raccoon incident was next level. It was horrific and made even seasoned horror fans cringe.

I hope no one had spaghetti for dinner last night, Killer Queens.

If a piece of horror content has nothing going for it but the gore factor, it fails. But, if there are no gross-out moments, it’s hard to say it’s part of the genre at all. This episode of American Horror Story found a happy medium. Placing several well-done moments of blood and grossness among scenes of beautiful people and beautiful places. Like a maggot in a dish of delicious food.

What didn’t work

Now, let’s talk about another gross scene that didn’t work out as well. Siobhan and Hamish’s bedroom scene was awful.

I mean, the acting was fine I guess. But the whole concept of the two of them sleeping together for some sort of career gain was upsetting.

Here’s the part that upset me the most about this situation. There is a strong insinuation in this scene that Anna’s breakout movie was a breakout because Siobhan orchestrated it. That Anna’s sudden rise had nothing to do with her being talented. That she’s simply chosen as a pawn in whatever game Siobhan is playing. And I hate that.

Advertisement

I hate that once again, Anna doesn’t belong to herself.

There’s just one episode left in part one of American Horror Story Delicate. I don’t at this point know the launch date for part two, only that it’s going to be sometime in 2024. So at this point, there are a lot of questions without answers. And I’m sure next week’s mid-season finale will only give us more.

5 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

Suburban Screams, Cursed Neighborhood

Published

on

Episode five of John Carpenter’s Suburban Screams was one of the best kind of horror stories. It is a dark, eerie tale of a mean house that is determined to destroy anyone who dares reside within it.

The story

Our story begins in 1682. A group of colonists are attempting to take over land that is very much not theirs. When the colonists are killed, they vow to curse the land.

Fast forward to modern times, and the land in question is a little suburban neighborhood. Carlette Norwood moves in with her husband, mother, and daughters. The house seems like a dream come true. Until, of course, their beautiful dream home becomes a nightmare. The curse of the colonists wrapped itself around the neck of each family member, turning them into people that they didn’t recognize. People who don’t exactly like each other.

What worked

While I wouldn’t say that the acting in this episode is flawless, it was several steps above what we’ve seen so far. Every actor seemed to understand their role and reacted in realistic ways. I was especially impressed by the young woman playing Angelique. She had the good sense to not overplay the role, giving each scene exactly the right amount of energy.

Advertisement

Of course, there was one actress who way overplayed every scene. But rather than being terrible, it was terrific. And that was Chloe Zeitounian, who played the neighbor Stacy. Stacy the neighbor was creepy as shit. After an unnamed neighbor dies by suicide, Stacy shows up at Carlette’s house with a bottle of champagne, sipping coffee with a big old smile. Well, okay it probably wasn’t coffee.

Stacy was a fantastic character, and I hope there was a crazy neighbor just like her. I bet her house was haunted as hell, but she just decided that her ghost was like a stray dog that everyone else thinks is dangerous. She probably put a bejeweled collar on the colonist ghost and renamed him Kori spelled with an I on purpose.

Finally, I want to talk about the theme of ancestral curse and ancestral protections that this episode discussed.

Charles County was cursed by the colonists who took the land that rightfully belonged to the indigenous tribes. They took what their ancestors had given them, and left a curse in their wake.

At the end of the episode, Carlette talks about being protected by her ancestors. Ancestors that survived horrible things most of us can’t imagine. I am sure that their strength blessed Carlette, and helped her to save Angelique.

Advertisement

What didn’t work

While this episode was certainly better than most of the season, it wasn’t perfect. The thing that most stood out to me as being frankly unneeded was the inclusion of maggots attacking Brian.

Paul A Maynard in Suburban Screams.

In multiple scenes, during which Carlette is narrating, Brian has maggots coming out of open wounds. Never once does Carlette mention a maggot issue.

It feels like there is a clear reason why the creators did this. This story doesn’t have a lot of blood, gore, or jump scares. And a core goal of horror content is to cause a reaction.

Stephen King has a great quote about this goal. “I recognize terror as the finest emotion and so I will try to terrorize the reader. But if I find that I cannot terrify, I will try to horrify, and if I find that I cannot horrify, I’ll go for the gross-out. I’m not proud.”

The inclusion of maggots in this story admits that someone involved didn’t think the story was terrorizing or horrifying enough. But it was. The story was freaky all on its own without the inclusion of our wriggling friends.

Is it true?

This might be an unpopular opinion, but aside from the completely unnecessary maggots infesting Brian, I think this episode is the most honest and accurate one so far.

Advertisement

The thing about hauntings is that they’re seldom what we see in the movies. Haunted houses don’t have glass vases flying off shelves and wallpaper peeling to reveal 666 painted in blood over arcane symbols. Haunted houses dig into the minds of those who live there, causing bad luck and bad vibes. And that’s exactly what happened here. There are no massive explosions. No spirits throwing people downstairs or demonic dogs chasing children from the attic. This house dug into the hearts and minds of a loving family, ripping them apart.

So yes, I do think this episode is likely true.

The further we get into Suburban Screams, the more I enjoy it. This episode was eerie, upsetting, and riveting. I hope that Carlette and her daughters are healing from this horrific journey. And I’m thankful to them for sharing their story. 4.5 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Happy Father’s Day Herman Munster!

Published

on

Herman Munster would be so proud, collage by Jennifer Weigel
Herman Munster would be so proud, collage by Jennifer Weigel

Today for Father’s Day I want to celebrate one the best dads in horror ever: Herman Munster! Herman Munster of television celebrity is a perfect example of a good father in a genre awash in epically horrible parents. He is fun to be around, cares deeply about family, and has a huge heart. He is essentially the naive and loving Frankenstein’s monster despite his horrific appearance, and is aptly employed at a funeral home.

Herman is lovable, hardworking, and always ready with the physical humor dad jokes, even if he is too naive to catch on to his role in the punchlines all the time. He is devoted to his wife Lily Dracula and son Eddie and will do whatever he can to protect them. His generosity extends beyond just his own, with the family taking in his niece Marilyn (who is painfully normal by comparison to the Munsters), and father-in-law Grandpa.

Portrayed by Fred Gwynne, Herman Munster is kind of the epitome of the good father in horror. Sure, he’s a brute, and can be a little dim sometimes, but he’s really just a big teddy bear at heart, and always ready for a good laugh. And apparently Herman Munster was even nominated by his son Eddie for Father of the Year in Season 2, Episode 25, so it all comes around full circle. If the show highlight doesn’t load, you can find it here.

And to celebrate more great Hollywood celebrities, here’s a poem for Ed Wood and an homage to Theda Bara

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Suburban Screams, The Bunny Man

Published

on

Someone is stalking the children of Fairfax, Virginia. He comes bearing an axe. He comes from the forest. He comes in the night.

He comes dressed as a bunny.

The story

In the 1970s, the sleepy town of Fairfax Virginia was menaced by a man dressed as a rabbit. He stalked kids and teens with an axe while they were playing in the woods, or ‘parking’. Children were cautioned to not play outside after dark. Parents were terrified. The whole community was rocked by the horrific killer who, well, didn’t kill anybody. And who might have been a whole bunch of people inspired by a truly sad tale?

Still from Suburban Screams The Bunny Man.

The story begins a hundred years earlier. A man whose name is lost to time is accused of stealing a cow. For this crime, he’s sentenced to death because things were a lot tougher back then. The man escaped but swore vengeance on the town. A few days later several children were found hanging from a bridge underpass, butchered and hung as though they were slaughtered rabbits.

What worked

The biggest thing to love about this episode, the one thing that sets it apart from the rest of the season, was the presence of Historian Cindy Burke. Finally, we have an actual professional talking about one of these stories. Yes, there are still first-hand accounts. But that is how these sorts of stories work best. We have the emotional retelling of evocative survivors. But we also have a professional who is emotionally separated from the situation backing up these stories with historical knowledge.

Advertisement

This wouldn’t have mattered as much in any other setting. But Suburban Screams has been clear from the start that it wants to be seen as a documentary. This is supposed to be real. And if you’re going to claim that your ghost story is real, bring receipts. As many as you can.

If we’d seen more historians, detectives, and police reports through this series, it probably wouldn’t have the bad rating it does on IMDB.

What didn’t work

Well, it might still have had a bad rating. Because the acting in this episode was, for lack of a stronger word, terrible.

I don’t know if it was the directing, the casting, or just a weak talent budget. But not a single person except for the man playing the Bunny Man could act in any of these dramatic reenactment scenes.

The worst offender was probably the child playing Ed’s childhood friend. This character was way overacted. It’s as though the child had seen a parody of how little boys behave, and was told to act like that. As this was a little boy, he was likely a bit embarrassed.

Advertisement

And I know, I’m trash-talking a child actor. I’m trash-talking all of the children actors in this episode. But children can act. There are lots of examples of kids doing great acting jobs. Stranger Things is an obvious example. Violent Night is another. The kid can act. These kids couldn’t act.

Is it true?

Unlike most of the other episodes in this series, The Bunny Man is a story I’ve heard before. It is a legitimate urban legend that blossomed from a few firsthand accounts of madmen doing scary things dressed as rabbits in Fairfax County, West Virginia. These events probably inspired others to do stupid things like dress up like a rabbit and run around with an ax. Much like the people who decided to dress up like clowns and scare the hell out of people across the country in 2016.

So, yes, the Bunny Man is very much real. He’s real in the hearts and minds of pranksters and West Virginia frat boys. And he is based on some very real, very upsetting, actual events.

I honestly wish the whole season of Suburban Screams had been exactly like this. Filled with facts, first-hand accounts, and proof of scary events. This was everything I wanted in a supernatural/true crime story. So if you’re giving the rest of the season a pass, I would suggest watching this episode.

Advertisement
4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending