Connect with us

Published

on

We’ve reached the end of season three of Netflix’s The Witcher. This has been a tumultuous season. Episodes have ranged from great to insultingly bad. Rumors of main characters leaving the show have tainted the viewing. But now that I’ve experienced the entire season, I have just one thing to say. 

It isn’t worth anybody’s time. 

Henry Cavill and Joey Batey in Witcher.

The Story

When we begin, Geralt is still recovering with the dryads. He more than eager to leave, but can’t stand up on his own yet. Jaskier is there helping him recover, along with a woman named Milva. She’s not a dryad, but another person they’ve rescued. She is not amused by Geralt.

Meanwhile Yennefer is kind of looking for Ciri? I mean, we see her questioning someone about Ciri. But we don’t actually see her looking. Mostly, she’s helping to get Aratuza back in order. She’s laying the novices to rest. She’s rallying the mages. She’s doing everything but going to, you know, find her child. 

Which I would think would be a priority.

Advertisement

Eventually, we do catch up with Ciri, though neither Yennefer or Geralt do. She’s made some new friends, and has a much darker outlook on life.

So, that’s fun at least. 

What worked

I’d be lying if I didn’t say that there were some things to like in this episode. 

One thing I truly loved was Radovid’s change of heart. I loved his whole story arch, honestly. He went from frat brah to scary spymaster to man in love beautifully. And the ending of his story, which I won’t ruin in case you have the stomach for this train wreck of a season, was heartbreaking. 

What didn’t work

Here’s something that truly irritated me in this episode. Yennefer’s reaction to Ciri vanishing. Actually, everyone’s answer to Ciri vanishing. 

Advertisement
Henry Cavill in Witcher

Yes, I get that Geralt was injured. But nobody else was. And it’s pretty clear to me that Geralt isn’t the only one capable of going to get Ciri if she wants to be gotten. Does anyone want to honestly tell me that Yennefer and Jaskier couldn’t have gone to save her? Or hell, take Triss if you think you’ll need more help. But it is unrealistic that Yennefer, after all this time, would choose to try to rebuild Aratuza instead of going after Ciri her own damn self. 

Another thing that really bothered me about this episode was the sheer number of cliffhangers. I mean, if you watched the season and expected anything, I mean anything to be resolved, you’re out of luck. 

No one is reunited. Aratuza is still in shambles. The war is just starting.

I get that there’s going to be a fourth season. But that doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t have actually ended this one. 

If I’m being honest, a lot of my irritation at the end of this season is that we know Henry Cavill won’t be back for season four. If he was going to come back, this episode might not have felt like such a let down. 

And yes, you might say that the creators and showrunners didn’t know that he was going to leave. Except that they did know. They knew before this season began. There were rumors during the second season that he wasn’t coming back. Considerations could have been made. They could have written something into the story to explain why he’s going to come back looking totally different next season. 

Advertisement

Instead, we have Cavill going out after a meaningless fight with some no name characters at a no name town. 

It seems like a good team would have been able to prevent this sort of insulting ending for Cavill. But then, if Witcher had a good creative team, Cavill probably wouldn’t have been leaving in the first place. 

In conclusion, I don’t know that I’ll be sticking around for season four. Witcher started on a gloriously gory high note, and here it’s ended in a weak, bloody sputter. I don’t think I need to see any more.  2 out of 5 stars (2 / 5)

By the way, the second season of our horror/scifi podcast AA is coming out on August 15th. You can listen to the whole first season right now.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

Grave Encounters

Published

on

Released in 2011, Grave Encounters is one of the better-liked-found horror movies by both critics and horror fans alike. At least, that’s the opinion of the few who’ve seen it. For some reason, it’s not as well known as many others in the genre. So today, let’s spread awareness for this overlooked spooky gem.

The story

We begin our story with a TV executive, talking about an ill-fated reality show named Grave Encounters. He explains that everything went south during the taping of episode six. While the footage was retrieved, the ghost hunters were not. Our TV executive assures us that what we are about to see is not a movie, and has only been cut for time.

We then dive into the footage collected from episode six. The ghost-hunting team will spend the night in an old mental hospital called Collingwood Psychiatric Hospital.

During the night, the team does see a few eerie things. A door slams shut. A wheelchair moves on its own. Fairly standard ghost-hunting fair.

Advertisement

The real horror starts when the team isn’t released from the hospital in the morning. Because morning doesn’t come. The sun doesn’t rise and the doors don’t open to the outside world. Lance, TC, Sasha, Matt and Houston are all trapped inside an ever-changing hospital, with the patients who remain even in death.

Alex Timmer in Grave Encounters.

What worked

The first thing I want to talk about, and the part that attracted me to the film in the first place, is the parody element. Fans of ghost-hunting shows like Ghost Hunters will recognize many of the same elements. The title even has a very similar font. As someone who loves a good ghost hunt, but often finds that these shows take themselves a little too seriously, this was quite enjoyable.

Another thing I loved about Grave Encounters was the effects. The ghosts were shocking, not just the first time we saw them but every time. This is even more impressive when we remember that this movie had a budget of $120,000. The creators taught themselves how to do these effects, and most of them are practical, not CGI. This would have been impressive if the effects were just passible. And they were far more than that.

Finally, I want to talk about the character development. We start the film without much sympathy for our characters. Especially Lance. Lance was so punchable at first. He was flippant about others’ pain. He was clear that he’d make up evidence if he couldn’t find any. And he didn’t seem too interested in listening to his team.

Sean Rogerson in Grave Encounters.

By the end of the movie, though, we care about him and the rest of the team. And it takes so little time for us to change our minds. We see TC talk to his daughter, and realize he’s never going to get home to her. We see Sasha care about the people lost in the hospital. We see Lance protect Sasha and the rest of his team. We see that these people, as willing as they are to financially benefit from other people’s pain, actually do care about each other. No one is a coward. No one is leaving people behind. That’s admirable. And that makes me give a damn about them.

What didn’t work

All that being said, it wasn’t a perfect movie. To start with, there are some questions we don’t get answers to. And not in an acceptable way. It’s okay that we don’t know what really happens in the end. It’s okay that we don’t know how the spirits manipulate time. It’s not okay that one character is simply eaten by fog. That scene, close to the end, just felt lazy.

I will also say that some of the acting wasn’t great. Especially from Sasha, played by Ashleigh Gryzko. I won’t say she was terrible. But her acting was overdone. She was also a bit of a scream queen. We didn’t learn much about Sasha, except that she’s the token girl. Her character could have been fleshed out a bit more.

Advertisement

Overall, Grave Encounters is a great film. Whether you’re a fan of found footage, ghost hunting, or just spooky stories well told, this is one to put on your TBW list sooner rather than later.

For Haunted MTL, this is Nicole signing off.

4.5 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Agatha All Along, If I Can’t Reach You Let My Song Teach You

Published

on

Episode four of Agatha All Along started on a sad note and ended on a shocking reveal. Can we really ask for anything more?

The story

We begin this episode, as mentioned, at the graveside of poor Sharon. She’s the first to pass away on The Road, but I’ll be quite surprised if she’s the last.

It’s one thing to have died. But it’s quite another to have died surrounded by people who don’t really care and won’t really mourn you.

After that, we continue down The Road to find another house. This one appears to be familiar to Alice. She tries to turn around and go the other way, but The Road won’t let her escape that easy.

Advertisement
Patti LuPone, Kathryn Hahn, Ali Ahn, Sasheer Zamata and Joe Locke in Agatha All Along.

What they find inside is the home Alice shared with her mother. They also find a record of Alice’s mother’s version of the Ballad. After the coven starts experiencing Alice’s family curse, they realize the only way out is to sing The Ballad that can protect them. One that’s been protecting Alice for most of her life.

They do escape the house, but not unscathed. Teen is badly injured. And we see another side of Agatha. Maybe even one she didn’t know she had.

What worked

This aspect shocked me, but Agatha is a good team leader. This is undercut because we all know she doesn’t care about her team. But twice now she has stepped in and helped when a member of the coven was struggling. She didn’t do it with love but with honesty. And sometimes that’s what we need.

Another thing I want to draw attention to is the sexual tension between Agatha and Rio. However, they’re doing a fine job drawing attention to it themselves.

It is killing me.

Advertisement
Kathryn Hahn and Aubrey Plaza in Agatha All Along.

There is so much history between these two characters that we just don’t know yet. But we want to know. This is one of the biggest drives to watch the next episode, at least for me. While at first, it seemed like Agatha was to blame for their riff, it appears after this episode that it might have been Rio. Or, frankly, it might have been both of them. All I know is that I am constantly reminded of Rio’s question to Agatha from the first episode.

“Do you remember why you hate me?”

Finally, I thought the 70’s vibe of this episode was very fun. I especially liked the camera shots that were quite reminiscent of old 70’s show. The split screens, the quick gasp shots. It reminded me of Scooby Doo and Jabber Jaw in the best way.

What didn’t work

I don’t have much negative to say about this episode. The only real complaint I have is that I didn’t like this new version of The Ballad. It’s fine, but it isn’t nearly as cool as the first.

All in all, this was a great episode. I have so many questions about Teen, about Rio, and about what The Road has in store for the rest of them. And I can’t wait to see what’s next.

Advertisement
4.5 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Evil: “A is for Angel” (S2E2)

“A is for Angel” is an episode of the supernatural drama, Evil. The assessors investigate a potential angelic possession.

Published

on

“A is for Angel” is an episode of the supernatural drama, Evil, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. It originally aired under CBS before moving to Paramount+. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.

The assessors investigate a potential angelic possession. David (Mike Colter) meets a helpful nun (Andrea Martin as Sister Andrea). Kristen (Katja Herbers) talks to the police. Sheryl (Christine Lahti) takes out her frustration on someone who deserves it. Leland (Michael Emerson) makes a haunting confession.

A winged creature painted on a wall, emerging from the dark etchings around it. On its chest rests a trumpet
Archange Michael, apparently

What I Like about Evil: “A is for Angel”

While “A is for Angel” fears depicting a biblically accurate angel, it still evokes a haunting terror such angels evoke. Brandon J. Dirden’s Raymond/Archangel Michael provides an unsettling performance that directly comments or alludes to actions that angels take in the bible.

This episode introduces Sister Andrea, who will become a key character of the series, acting as a spiritual advisor and mentor to David specifically. She’s interesting enough to evoke lasting memorability, given more attention than debut characters in their introductory episodes.

Leland’s confession to David gets dark, revealing much of the personal relationship the two had before the series began. While nothing remains confirmed, and Leland clearly aims to antagonize David, David’s reaction suggests that some truthful admissions linger within the deception. However, it’s ultimately a viewer’s decision to weigh these claims.

Advertisement

“A is for Angel” creates a rather terrifying dynamic that evokes a haunting narrative. Where the previous episode focused more on what comes next, “A is for Angel” dives into the horrific implications of the procedural plot.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

As mentioned earlier, the procedural plot involves an angelic possession and some Old Testament godliness, which might upset some viewers. Some points suggest sexism and abuse, but little of this receives attention beyond the claim.

A character potentially murdered their wife, suggesting spousal abuse, but the reality of the situation seems blurred. Regardless, the victim tries to leave their abuser, which is a common source of abuse in domestic violence.

While nothing remains confirmed, a child molester apparently receives angelic punishment. The viewer takes the word of the angel’s supposed host on this claim, which hardly means an absolute confirmation.

Suicide, potentially assisted suicide, is another plot point alluded to in the episode. Little remains a proven fact, but the suggestion seems plausible considering what the viewer knows of the situation. As this remains the only confirmation, the claims seem interpretable.

A winged beast with several wings layered atop each other. At the center are several eyes looking at the viewer
Spare an Eye for a Seraphim

What I Dislike about Evil: “A is for Angel”

Again, “A is for Angel” puts a lot of focus on the horrifying concept of an angel but doesn’t try to depict a biblically accurate angel. Frankly, it’s a wasted opportunity, considering the haunting nature of their descriptions. Such descriptions rival that of Lovecraftian abomination in horrifying potential. It seems like a perfect opportunity for a show or film like Evil. Even as “A is for Angel” challenges the depictions, it hesitates to open its’ trillions of eyes to the opportunities available.

Leland allows the assessors into his home and leaves valuable evidence for the team to find. For such an intelligent character, these oversights seem uncharacteristic. Viewers might assume this frantic response is a ploy, but his reactions suggest otherwise.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

“A is for Angel” returns Evil to the horror roots that the previous episode hadn’t lingered on. The episode unravels some mysteries of the past that better contextualize relationships. If you’re eager for Old Testament godly intervention, this episode brings out a proper dose of it.
3 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending