We have a new Shudder Original to cover this month with the release of Glorious (2022). Does the film live up to the name? Find out in our review below how the sticky restroom-set horror comedy lands.
Glorious (2022)
Glorious, directed by Rebekah McKendry and written by Josuha Hull, David Ian McKendry, and Todd Rigney, follows a man named Wes after a particularly nasty breakup. After a series of drunken mishaps, he arrives at a rest stop. Soon he finds himself trapped in a men’s room with a mysterious stranger engaging him in conversation through a gloryhole. However, the conversation has cosmic consequences.
The film’s stars are Ryan Kwanten, J.K. Simmons, Tordy Clark, Sylvia Grace Crim, and André Lamar.
What worked with Glorious
The film is an excellent example of the fun that can be hand with Shudder’s Originals and Exclusives. This film wouldn’t have set box offices ablaze, but as a streaming offering, it works pretty well. The overall story is a neat blend of comedy, mystery, and Lovecraftian cosmic horror. It is a movie that can pivot from disturbing to funny several times within the same scene. The film’s two leads, Wes (Ryan Kwanten) and Ghat (J.K. Simmons), who spend most of the movie talking, carry it. A very dialogue-heavy film, moments of gore and surreal cosmic imagery punctuate Glorious. However, it balances the shocks with the dialogue well.
One of the great things about J.K. Simmons is that the man could read a phonebook, which everyone would hail as a stunning performance. Through Simmons’ voice acting, Ghat appears simultaneously charming and intimidating. Almost like a stern but loving uncle trying to guide Wes to do something significant. The balance of power switches periodically, but not significantly enough to give Wes any real agency in the story. This can be good or bad, depending on your interpretation.
Advertisement
The other performances, brief though they are, are compelling. André Lamar gets the most to do as Gary, the unfortunate property manager of the rest stop. He delivers some fleeting fun moments. Sylvia Grace Crim, who plays Brenda, Wes’s object of affection, plays the haunting lover well enough. However, her role doesn’t offer much beyond that. She becomes the trope of the development of a traumatized male in horror. Tordy Clark’s mysterious Sharon has a brief scene full of mystery. Yet, it doesn’t seem overly important to the story. She just more or less shows that other people have been to the rest stop.
Technical Aspects
Visually, the movie does a great job of taking a rest-stop bathroom and giving it enough visual interest not to grow monotonous. David Matthews’ cinematography is admirable given the unusual scale of the film. Cramped when needed, imposingly open otherwise, and the strange, out-of-time paintings within the restroom give it a sense of the uncanny, especially where the cosmic gloryhole is concerned. The film has a lot of visual similarities to the Color Out of Space. Glorious is drenched in cosmic purple lighting from time to time.
The audio engineering was solid, giving Ghat an otherworldly quality, but the music didn’t stand out that much, generally leaning into weird, cosmic synth without doing anything notable.
What didn’t work with Glorious
The film’s structure does have some weak spots, and even at a meager runtime of 89 minutes (a rarity for movies these days), the film does feel longer than it needs to be. Glorious does drag as the single location features similar beats across different scenes; Ghat asks Wes to do something, Wes attempts to escape or refuses, and Wes gets punished. This loop makes up most of the film, and only with the introduction of property manager Gary for a single scene do we get a natural break in that loop until the end.
Glorious is a story that the team could have trimmed by 20 minutes. The film doesn’t quite overstay its welcome, but I often questioned when the story would progress after a certain point.
The film’s attempted shocking revelation about Wes does not really land. Hints to Wes’ true nature show up but end up too obscured or subtle for the “aha!” moment. Most of Wes’s character’s depth stems from Kwanten’s performance instead of the writing.
Advertisement
While I think the cinematography overall was excellent, I did find two scenes featuring a space-level zoom-out to be a bit ridiculous and unnecessary. In a film that could benefit more from the subtext, the transparent nature of showing ‘cosmic implications’ felt downright silly.
Final Thoughts on Glorious (2022)
Glorious hits that sweet spot of Shudder Originals and Exclusives where interesting, fun horror films are given a chance to shine on an enthusiast’s platform. It is one of those films where horror fans can appreciate them for what they are as opposed to struggling at the box office. Glorious is not the best of Shudder’s offerings, but it is a lot of fun with two solid performances and a nice pairing of gore and comedy wrapped up in a Lovecraftian shell.
(3.5 / 5)
We’ve reached the final episode of American Horror Stories, season three. After the ups and downs of the season, I didn’t know what to expect. I felt that we were due a big finish, Killer Queens. But I feared we were in for a big letdown.
As it turns out, The Thing Under The Bed was neither.
The story
We begin our story with a little girl named Mary, who is scared of something under her bed. She sneaks out of her room, only to be caught by her father and sent back to sleep. And of course, there is something horrible waiting for her under her bed.
This scene cuts away to a woman named Jillian. She has strange dreams, including one about Mary. But her husband, Mark, doesn’t want to hear about it. He’s only interested in a little lovemaking because he wants a baby. Jillian doesn’t, which makes total sense because she’s already married to one. But her irritation with her childish husband goes away when he goes away. And by goes away, I mean he’s sloppily devoured by something vicious under their bed.
Advertisement
What worked
In short, this episode just worked. The acting was professional and believable. The cinematography and lighting work were wonderful, adding spooky effects and startling moments without impairing visibility.
Best of all, the story was solid. There were no plotholes to be found. Our main character, Jillian, was relatable and sympathetic.
This was maybe my favorite part of the story. I thought Jillian was a remarkably sympathetic character. She was dealt a hand she never asked for, having her husband slaughtered in their bedroom. I don’t think she missed him, so much as she was afraid of the legal ramifications of being caught with literal blood on her hands.
Then, when it would have been safest for her to just lay low and save up for a good defense attorney, she instead goes into unlikely hero mode. She does her best to save people, putting herself in legal and physical danger. It’s hard not to root for her.
It’s also a little hard not to root for the antagonist, too. I don’t want to ruin the twist for you, so I’m going to tread lightly here. But it’s great when you have an antagonist who might be off their rocker, but also maybe has a point.
Advertisement
What didn’t work
I can only really think of one complaint with this episode. And that is how frequently one character says the word Chickadee. And if you’ve seen the episode, you know what I am talking about.
I get it, he has a pet name for his daughter. It’s adorable. It’s meant to convey that the two of them have a healthy loving relationship and I get it. We all get it. Blind monks get it. But the fact remains that no parent on Earth calls their kid by their pet name every single time they speak an individual sentence to them. It was just too damn much.
All in all, this was a good episode. It was a classic story, turned on its head, told by professionals from start to finish. And I hope that if there is another season, we see more stories like this one. But after the efforts put into this season at large, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the last we see of American Horror Stories.
If you’ve watched enough short-form horror anthology shows, you’ll notice that some stories are mainstays. Each show seems to put on the same sort of episodes, with the occasional surprising storyline that we’ve never (or at least rarely) seen before.
Leprechaun was an example of a repeated story—the story of a greedy thief whose punishment far outweighs the crime.
The story
We begin our story in 1841, with a drunk man leaving the bar one late night. He’s distracted by something glowing at the end of the well. When he reaches down for the glowing thing, he falls in. Moments later, he screams.
We then cut to the modern day. The well is still there, and now it’s surrounded by a dying town. In this town lives a young man named Colin. He’s married, his wife is pregnant, and he’s out of work. Like many of his friends.
Advertisement
Desperate for cash, Colin and his friends decide to rob a bank. They put together an Equate version of Ocean’s Eleven, and break in one night. But, of course, they find that the gold is nothing more than bait. And the creature waiting for them is something they never expected.
What worked
The first thing I want to point out is how real this episode felt. At least to anyone currently living in the same small town they grew up in. These characters felt like guys I went to school with. Guys I would see at the bar.
I appreciated the real anger and frustration these characters are feeling. Especially Colin. He’s bitter, and maybe he has a right to be. He did exactly what he was supposed to do to succeed. He went to school and invested in his career, and yet now he’s out of work and struggling to support his family. I probably don’t need to tell you how that feels. Because of this, we can all kind of understand why he was tempted to rob a bank.
I also want to talk about the fact that this was, as I said, an often-explored story. That can be a bad thing, but it can also be a good thing. This story is told over and over because it’s a good story. A relatable story. And there’s nothing wrong with that.
What didn’t work
That being said, this version didn’t try to do much to break out of the mold.
Because we have seen this story so many times, most of us could tell the story themselves. I would have expected something new, or some twist. But, in the end, the story didn’t bring anything new to the discussion.
Advertisement
Maybe because of this, the ending left a lot to be desired. Trapped in the basement of the bank, everyone just sort of stares at everyone else, until the thieves give up. And that’s it. The ending wasn’t scary, shocking, or funny. It was just sad, on multiple levels.
Overall, this was an okay story. It was entertaining, if not surprising. I would compare this episode to homemade macaroni and cheese. Everyone’s got their own version, they’re all pretty good, and none of them are exciting.
There’s just one episode left in this season of American Horror Stories. Let’s hope they’ve saved the best for last.
We begin our story late at night, with a hospital security guard named Malcolm. He is frightened one night when he sees a woman with a distorted face in the hospital parking lot.
We then joined an RN named Claire. She’s doing her best to explain to a struggling mother that the hospital will not be able to treat her son with cancer because she can’t afford the treatment.
Not like she’s happy about it.
Advertisement
Fortunately, Dr. Nostrum, played by the legend Henry Winkler, swoops in at the last moment to tell the mother that her son qualifies for a special place in his cancer treatment clinic.
Claire is lamenting the fact that she became an RN to help people, but it feels like she isn’t doing anything good. Then, she and her friend Lilly stumble upon the same woman who menaced Malcom the night before.
While Claire is trying to figure out what’s wrong with this woman, she brutally slaughters an orderly and vanishes into the hospital. But not before struggling to say two words to Claire. Ward X.
What worked
I want to start by praising the effects of this episode. Because they were fantastic. Aided by the black and white filming, the bloody and distorted faces of Alice and her fellow victims are nightmarish. They look like a horrific version of Lockjaw taken to a terrifying extreme.
I also want to discuss the fantastic work of Henry Winkler. He is an absolute legend and never has a bad project.
Advertisement
Winkler’s character in this episode was exactly what we’d expect from him. He seems genuinely warm and kind, concerned about others’ well-being. Even when he’s planning to kill Claire, he comes off as such a caring guy.
Finally, I want to talk about the historical significance of this story. Because, like I always say, the scariest stories are the ones based on truth. And I’m sorry to say, this story has a basis in truth.
Mankind has a dark and twisted history when it comes to medical advances. Most doctors and scientists are good, moral people who abide by the first line of the Hippocratic oath, to first do no harm. Some, historically, are little more than monsters in white coats. Consider the Tuskegee Experiment, Unit 731, and the horrific acts of Josef Mengele. If you’re going to look up that middle one, be warned that it is NSFL.
While this episode of American Horror Stories was a work of fiction, it wasn’t that far off. I don’t think many of us want to admit how close to real life it was. This is the gift of good horror, to force us to come face to face with the worst aspects of humanity. To acknowledge them, accept them, and change them.
All in all, this was a perfect episode. The acting, the effects and the story were all top-shelf. And it’s certainly a story that will stick with you.
Advertisement
There are just two episodes left in this season of American Horror Stories. Let’s hope that they reach closer to the quality of X, and away from the dull and dismal episodes that began the second half of this season.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.