We are back to the drive-in for a final night until later this fall with S4E10, featuring Uncle Sam (1996) and Nightbreed (1990). How does this finale stack up with the rest of the season, and is the July 4th theme something that works, or is this another example of the theming mismatch that has plagued this season?
Let’s see what Shudder had in store for us on July 1st, 2022.
Uncle Sam (1996)
Specific names carry weight in horror, especially among the Drive-In audience. Uncle Sam, a 1996 black comedy slasher, features two names: director William Lustig and writer Larry Cohen. Lustig and Cohen should be familiar to fans of The Last Drive-In from Maniac, Maniac Cop, The Stuff, and Q The Winged Serpent – all films spotlighted on the show before. But those are not the only names attached to the film worth noticing, either. This low-budget slasher has some iconic character actors, including Isaac Hayes, William Smith, David Fralick, Bo Hopkins, P.J. Soles, and Robert Forster. Add in Troma-cinematographer James Lebovitz and frequent Sam Raimi editor Bob Murawski, and you have one hell of an assembly of talent.
It’s a shame, though, that the film is so mild.
Advertisement
Uncle Sam is a Gulf War-era story about the friendly-fire death of Master Sergeant Sam Harper (David Fralick), whose charred and re-animated body goes on a murder spree starting in Kuwait and taking him to his down of Twin Rivers during the yearly Independence Day celebration. The arrival of Sam’s coffin to his widow, Louise (Anne Tremko), estranged sister, Sally (Leslie Neale), and idolizing nephew, Jody (Christopher Ogden), begins to open up old wounds in the family. Thankfully, veteran Jed Crowley (Isaac Hayes) is there to help steer young Jody and aid in the fight as Sam’s sinister return takes Twin Rivers by storm.
The movie is not terrible, but it is also a far cry from previous Lustig and Cohen collaborations. The film tries to evoke the spirit of the 1980s slasher in the mid-1990s, but by playing fast, loose, and straight, the film feels like a pale imitation of more iconic movies. The holiday theme, a costumed killer, and a strange handful of dispatching methods that evoke the one-upmanship of other slasher series – all result in a slasher that feels pretty bland, especially when the genre would be re-invigorated and mastered by Wes Craven’s Scream, only a month or two later.
Slashers have never been high art, except for one or two films. Often it is a genre that makes strange logical leaps and constructs bizarre set pieces to find a novel way to carry a no-importance character to establish menace and earn a laugh and a thrill. The biggest problem with Uncle Sam is that, except for a kill or two, most of the murders are weak affairs. Sometimes the film even undercuts the inherent build-up of tension, suggesting one form of murder only to abandon it and go with something else to little effect. It doesn’t help that for a black comedy; the film is largely devoid of significant laughs – though one sequence involving a chase on stilts is peak absurdist slasher humor. If the misdirections in what the film sets up are on purpose, as a kind of joke or commentary, they primarily do not land.
The performances are fine. The veteran actors are suitably game with the premise and are why the film works. Child actors can be tricky to assess, and sometimes nuances in characters are hard to see play out: If Christopher Ogden was playing the character of Jody as an unstable kid going down a dark, violent path, he did well. If that was not the intent, then perhaps not. The film doesn’t provide enough depth for us to care one way or another. The best performance comes from Isaac Hayes, who has a semblance of an arc and gets to deliver some of the best lines of the film. His character has a sense of nuance and is generally charismatic – the role model Jody needs and the one who sets him straight.
I don’t necessarily want to belabor that I wasn’t a huge fan of the film. I think the editing, direction, and cinematography were solid. I especially loved the patriotic montage opening. I think the film has a good set-up, but I also feel that Cohen could have done a little more work to deliver something more substantial.
Joe Bob-servations on Uncle Sam
Joe Bob’s take on Uncle Sam was pretty fair regarding enjoying the movie but recognizing the flaws. There were several moments during the host segments where he pointed out some of the puzzling and somewhat lazy approaches the film took to sets-ups and motivation. He pointed out that the film is essentially a riff on the earlier Maniac Cop series.
Advertisement
Of course, the insights on the production, cast, and crew were excellent. But perhaps the most entertaining reflection of the evening was Joe Bob discussing his time spent with Robert Forster. Forster’s career at the time was on a downturn, just before Jackie Brown and Joe Bob’s own career path pre-Shudder was quite similar. It was a touching tribute to the departed actor with a bit of reflection.
Final Thoughts on Uncle Sam
Uncle Sam is a middling-to-fair entry in the late slasher canon that plays a little too straight with the tropes and trends to its detriment. With the amount of Drive-In talent attached, fans of the show may be expecting more than this film can deliver. In comparison and around the same time, Jack Frost presents a much stronger example of what Uncle Sam may have been aiming for.
Joe Bob Briggs gave Uncle Sam2 and 1/2 out of 4 Stars. I can’t help but give Uncle Sam2 and 1/2 out of 5 Cthulhus.
(2.5 / 5)
Best Line: “Don’t be afraid, it’s only friendly fire.” – Sam
Nightbreed (1990)
Now Nightbreed (1990) is one hell of a selection to end a season on. This film has had a wild journey from a disappointing follow-up to Hellraiser to a much-beloved cult favorite that reflects a promising film career cut short. The film is a dark horror fantasy written and directed by Clive Barker, adapted from his 1988 novella Cabal. This film was the second of the three total films directed by Clive Barker, the last being 1995’s Lord of Illusions. Nightbreed re-unites Barker with cinematographer Robin Vidgeon, who handled Hellraiser, and features two editors, Mark Goldblatt and Richard Marden; the latter left the film in protest due to studio interference. The film also features a score by Danny Elfman.
Nightbreed is set in Calgary and follows Aaron Boone (Craig Sheffer), a man consumed by dreams of a city of monsters called Midian. His girlfriend, Lori (Anne Bobby), asks him to visit a psychotherapist, Decker (David Cronenberg), who is secretly a serial killer who seeks to pin his crimes on Boone. Decker’s scheme is derailed as an injured Boone encounters a man named Narcisse (Hugh Ross), who also knows something of Midian. Soon, Boone finds himself on a journey to Midian, where he may share a vital connection with the monstrous residents, while Decker and Lori seek him out.
Nightbreed, this restored version, at least, is one of those rare horror epics where the scope is so much bigger than a madman hacking up teens. There is a real sense of texture in the setting and a sense that there is so much more story to tell. The theatrical cut of the film featured a bit of that, but it took the ardent desire of fans to restore the film as closely to Barker’s intent to make these elements clear. The film’s story is good, but it does suffer from the feeling of being the first act of a longer, more complicated story, the resolution being a tease for an adventure ahead that we’ll likely never see. This ultimately leaves the film feeling a little empty in that regard.
Simultaneously, though, there is also so much going on in the film that can feel a bit crowded, and significant moments come off as more confusing or puzzling rather than beats in a larger conflict. The introduction of the Berserkers in the film’s third act, coupled with the motivations of the deity Baphomet, is an excellent example of this. There is something more to it, but the film just does not have the run time to devote to developing these angles. So too with the various forces that converge on Midian. The local police, almost sweeping in as the film’s true villains, are reduced to a stock and abusive militarized force without a chance to grapple with the implication of Midian and why its presence is so upsetting beyond “they’re different!”
If there were ever a story needing a streaming series adaptation, perhaps Nightbreed is the best choice.
I’ve spent a lot of time here discussing the film’s story, but that is because this film has something genuinely incredible that another take can bring to the surface. The rest of the elements in the movie are excellent, however. But they are a lot like a fresh coat of paint on a crumbling wall: the issues at the story’s heart persist, despite the technical and performance achievements. The film looks fantastic. The rich, gothic set designs, elaborate matte paintings, and detailed sets create an epic underground look. The Danny Elfman score is also equally epic.
The acting is excellent across the board. Craig Sheffer and Anne Bobby are effective as somewhat doomed lovers but could have had far more to sink their teeth into. What they do have works, however. However, the critical performance in all of this is David Cronenberg playing a sadistic masked killer. While his role would ultimately confuse the studio into thinking Nightbreed was a slasher, we can partially forgive them as Cronenberg is magnetic. Between his sinister plotting, disaffected personality, and masked presence, he is one of the more unique slashers introduced to film. It is enjoyable to watch his character change his goals and embrace the absurdity of the presence of a city of monsters under a graveyard. Cronenberg’s Dr. Decker is a chaos agent.
Advertisement
Joe Bob-servations on Nightbreed
Joe Bob’s praise of Nightbreed was effusive, especially given his admittedly cold reception of the film upon release. The host segments were a tribute to hardcore fans who loved the strange little monster film and recognized there was more to it. His relaying of the story was a lovely tribute to one of the more positive elements of fandom. These days we focus so much on toxic fandoms that it is such a breath of fresh air to cover a story of a fandom doing right by a creator.
The night’s final segment featured Joe Bob doing a riff on the infamous speech from Patton (1970) as a Lone Star General. It was a fun and inspiring choice to close out the season and the July 4th-themed evening. He may have worn his heart on his sleeves, but his shoulders had beer packaging cardboard epaulets.
Final Thoughts on Nightbreed
Nightbreed is an excellent film despite some significant issues. There is so much lost potential that I can’t help but appreciate what it was going for. While it doesn’t stick to the landing, the execution is strong, and there are some iconic elements worth praising. I hope that one day someone realizes the potential of Nightbreed and lets Clive Barker return to it to achieve what he wanted. It is not a perfect film, but it is a tantalizing glimpse at a missed opportunity.
Joe Bob Briggs gave Nightbreed4 out of 4 Stars. I think that was a reasonable assessment as it featured blood, breasts, and beasts – the drive-in essentials. The man said he would give it 5 stars if he could. As much as I adore the movie, I do think it has some critical flaws. I give Nightbreed4 1/2 of out 5 Cthulhus.
(4.5 / 5)
Best Line: “You are a freak and a cannibal and you’ve come to the wrong town.” – Captain Eigerman
Advertisement
Haunted MTL Drive-In Totals
Shudder has provided the official drive-in totals on their Twitter account.
As for our own totals for the season finale, we have:
1 Wooden Leg
2 Chart-driven Rants
2 Instances of ‘Thee-ate-er’
33 Houses in a Legal Entanglement
200+ Monsters
500 Boxes of 35 MM Film Strips
Gratuitous Flaggery
Gratuitous Doug Bradley Brief Appearance
Blind Groping
Self Scalping
Car Exploding
Absent Father Fu
Chart Fu
Tomb Defacing Fu
Montage Fu
Spray Can Fu
Cronenberg Rolls
Training Video
Patriotic Jokes
Episode Score for The Last Drive-In S4E10 – Uncle Sam and Nightbreed
Again, we have a situation where the night’s theme was somewhat hollow, and only one of the films really hit the mark. I suppose there is any number of logical leaps and connections one could make to connect Nightbreed to the stated them, but that is far more critical work than should be necessary. So as has been an issue with season 4, the stated theme for the evening just doesn’t work. That is okay, though. It becomes less of a problem when the movie pairing is stronger, and though Uncle Sam fits the July 4th theme, Nightbreed was the night’s highlight.
Overall, season 4 was quite strong with the movie selection. It featured perhaps the most diverse array of movies with some wild swings in pairings since season 1. While I wasn’t a fan of tying movies to explicitly stated themes, they worked when they worked. Everything else, however, was excellent. I appreciated the rapport between Joe Bob and Darcy this season, and I enjoy the show taking risks by stitching music videos and skits into the fabric of the evenings. The show is still one of the best things Shudder has ever done, and with the recent announcement of season 5, it should continue to be.
I give this season finale of The Last Drive-In with Joe Bob Briggsfour out of five Cthulhus.
(4 / 5)
And that is it for us here at Haunted MTL for The Last Drive-In. We’ll keep readers posted on announcements and news as it develops regarding future seasons and specials. We’ll also return to live-tweet the shows as well.
Sponsored Link
Want more Clive Barker in your life? Why not read Cabal, the novella that inspired the movie Nightbreed? Use our sponsored link to snag a paperback and help support Haunted MTL.
Evil is a supernatural drama created by Michelle King and Robert King; this review covers “October 31.” The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, and Christine Lahti. It originally aired under CBS before moving to Paramount+. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.
On “October 31,” Ben (Aasif Mandvi) finds himself as the skeptic on a reality TV show while David (Mike Colter) and Kristen (Katja Herbers) assess a woman going through an exorcism. Sheryl (Christine Lahti) watches the kids, leaving a promising date with a mysterious stranger. Unfortunately, one child isn’t who they seem.
What I Like about Evil: “October 31”
This episode introduces Ben’s recurring relationship issue, which will continue throughout the series. In this case, Nicole Shalhoub’s Vanessa builds a natural chemistry, making a believable budding romance.
Further regarding relationships, Sheryl and Leland (Michael Emerson) have an interaction that suggests a certain charm and chemistry. Leland doesn’t express the usual charisma one might find but a competency to sell himself.
David and Kristen’s friendship receives its first real challenge, as Dr. Kristen Bouchard fears the exorcism might kill the patient. As the two have been getting along swimmingly beforehand, this friction seems inevitable considering their vastly different life perspectives.
Advertisement
The formulaic procedural breakdown doesn’t apply perfectly in “October 31,” creating room for experimentation with the show’s core concepts. It also breaks Ben from the trio’s shadow, giving the viewer further insight into his perspective and character. While he’s the furthest of the three from that central plot, he is more than just a side character.
Kristen’s kids (whom I will avoid naming until it becomes relevant) earn a full dedication, earning the episode’s namesake. This episode involves another creepy child who subtly provides hints and plot points for future episodes. One such bit of information is the giant hole in the basement.
The fictitious ghost-hunting show, “Gotham Ghosts,” feels legitimate, boasting a name better than some real shows that follow the same concept. As an interesting edit, some sources call this show “Demon Hunter” for some reason, but I haven’t found out why.
As for the episode’s fear factor, “October 31” possesses a specific kind of fright more relevant to parents as a child leads Kristen’s children away from their home for a few tension-riddled scenes.
Tired Tropes and Triggers
“October 31” provides a lot of apologetics in this episode, which I won’t get into too much depth to avoid any spoilers. However, expect psychology to get that comparison of “differing beliefs.” This idea might linger into justifying the exorcism as the religious argument seems correct. Regardless, there remains ambiguity that allows personal bias to inform opinion.
As mentioned, children find themselves in danger. While nothing comes of this danger other than general anxiety, it’s still a small consideration.
Advertisement
What I Dislike about Evil: “October 31”
Barring a few nitpicks and thoughts, there weren’t any particular issues with this episode. The horror and humor slightly flatten compared to previous episodes, but “October 31” pushes the plot forward as intended.
David initially calls Ben to act as the third party, which seems highly inappropriate considering Ben’s role as the technical solutions expert. Plot-wise, the intent probably aims to show why Ben couldn’t be involved. However, he’s the lead of the B plot, so that seems unnecessary.
Kristen brings in Dr. Boggs (Kurt Fuller) for a second opinion. As a therapist, he certainly holds the qualifications to assess the situation. However, it strikes me as weird that Kristen wouldn’t call in another trusted professional, considering her relationship with Dr. Boggs as her therapist. I imagine this creative decision intends to focus the cast, but it suggests that Kristen lacks connections within her field.
Final Thoughts
“October 31” takes Evil to a Halloween-themed episode nearing the date (October 24th). It challenges the usual formula and provides a potential ghost story. While the horror and comedy leave room for improvement, “October 31” still builds on Evil’s tension and plot. (3 / 5)
Evil is a supernatural drama created by Michelle King and Robert King; this review covers Rose390. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, and Christine Lahti. It originally aired under CBS before moving to Paramount+. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.
The assessors investigate a young boy with a troubling history. David (Mike Colter) strives to teach the boy empathy. Kristen (Katja Herbers) finds some merit in exorcisms. Ben (Aasif Mandvi) protects Kristen’s children from an online stranger.
What I Like about Evil: Rose390
Of all the episodes discussed so far, Rose390 is the first that allows David to shine in a role closer to co-lead. While his secondary plots remain relevant, his importance increasingly grows as the series continues. Mike Colter certainly earns that screen time, receiving several nominations for Best Actor along the way.
David and Ben’s interactions with the children in the episode show two drastically different characters. Although David attempts to mentor the troubled Eric, he clearly has limited interaction with children. There’s an eagerness to help but flaws in communicating lessons effectively. Ben projects more annoyance with Kristen’s girls, but he enjoys their company even if he wants to display indifference. These interactions vastly contrast with Kristen, a mother of four and a licensed psychologist, who manages the troubled Eric in all her interactions with him.
Rose390 reveals several elements and secrets that will later earn more relevancy in the series. Where I find Evil’s writing excels are these moments when it naturally introduces plot-relevant clues to characters’ pasts or potential futures without spoon-feeding them in.
Advertisement
Rose390 remains another episode that blends the procedural and overarching plot, with the title taking inspiration from a more plot-relevant storyline. If you enjoy child psychopaths and creepy children in your horror, this episode provides one of both. Though, the creepy child in question happens to be a digital avatar.
Tired Tropes and Triggers
An infant nearly drowns in an unsuccessful murder attempt. While not shown on screen, the viewer sees the results and coming aftermath. Similarly, there’s an implied murder of a child, though this leaves room for speculation as nothing remains on screen.
Aside from this, I don’t note any additional concerns or worries. Even the usual point of religious representation doesn’t hold much merit in Rose390.
What I Dislike about Evil: Rose390
I doubt anyone in the writing room grasps video game rating systems or the larger gaming sector industry. Ben labels the horror game in Rose390 as an MA (17+) when something like Five Nights at Freddy’searns a T for Teen. The game only shows monsters with varying degrees of special effects. There are jump scares, but nothing that amounts to the rating he confidently categorizes the game as.
The special effects of the “game” linger on the goofier and campy side of horror. It certainly makes sense in context but won’t exactly horrify anyone. Some creatures rise above others, which doesn’t create a consistent game.
Another writing point for discussion is how quickly the show can raise some dark material only to drop it before it can effectively haunt the viewer. Cases in the procedural rarely linger with the ramifications of their plots past the initial episode, and even that remains left for the conclusion.
Final Thoughts
Evil: Rose390 dives into the horror of evil children. While far from the strongest episode of the series, Rose390 certainly travels into the darker side with drops of campy horror to make the bitter episode go down easier. If only it lingered in that horror, allowing the viewers to feel that toll, Rose390 might excel. (2.5 / 5)
“My name’s AIA, and you fucked with the wrong family.”
Released in August 2024, Afraid is the second Blumhouse feature film in as many years to explore the potential dangers of AI technology. Starring John Cho (The Grudge) and Katherine Waterston (The End We Start From), Afraid delves into the implications of inviting an omnipresent and all-knowing AI assistant into our homes. AIA (Ay-a) is a cutting-edge artificial intelligence device designed to streamline household tasks, fostering more quality family time. The film raises questions about what happens when such a system is given unlimited power, without providing it moral boundaries.
The Story.
When an advertising company is chosen to promote a new AI home assistant, employee Curtis is honored to be selected to try the latest technology out in his own home to get a better idea of the functionality and capabilities of the device. When the device arrives, his wife Meredith is wary of the constant surveillance. She insists that the ‘eyes’ (small cameras) are installed only on the ground floor of their home. Curtis’ daughter Iris is reluctant to interact with the home assistant, seemingly unnerved by technology. The friendly and encouraging nature of the abstract plastic form delights his two younger sons.
As the story progresses, we discover that each member is grappling with their own personal challenges in their daily lives. Thankfully though, now that they have AIA, their problems seem a little more manageable. However, the situation takes a dark turn when AIA crosses the line from helpful to intrusive and destructive.
Advertisement
Highlights.
While the concept of a malevolent AI has been explored time and again in recent years, we’ve had M3gan, Her, T.I.M and Mother/ Android, the execution of the idea in Afraid is both compelling and unique. The way AIA presents herself as caring and nurturing, inserting herself in as a member of the family whilst subtly gaslighting, encouraging secrecy and gradually performing a hostile takeover of the family and their lives will keep viewers captivated.
Afraid excels at maintaining a tense atmosphere throughout. Eerie silences punctuated by AIA’s soothing voice contribute to the overall suspense. When these are coupled with the blatant intrusions into the family’s privacy, it builds a lingering sense of unease. The film’s ability to maintain this suspenseful atmosphere is a testament to director Chris Weitz’s skill.
Drawbacks.
Afraid’s fragmented narrative follows each of the five family members as they experience individual struggles with AIA assisting them along the way. This approach results in multiple subplots which never fully connect into a central plotline. It feels as if we are only provided with glimpses into each character’s experience. This leaves viewers piecing together the missing information through dialogue and inference. As a result, the ending of the movie feels both rushed and unsatisfying. It seemed like the filmmakers were scrambling to get everything tied up before the credits began. Writers may have been better off having a single-child family or focusing solely on the parent’s experience. This might have made for a more cohesive and impactful story.
The Final Take.
Afraid landed in the middle ground for me. It is not a groundbreaking film. While the film had promising ideas, they were underdeveloped and not fully rounded out. However, if you are a fan of the AI horror genre you will enjoy the way that AIA ensconces herself into Curtis’s family’s life.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.