Connect with us

Published

on

Welcome back to Haunted MTL as we cover Chucky – S1 E5 – “Little Little Lies,” the latest episode of the ongoing series featuring America’s favorite killer doll.

This series of reviews will be spoiler-free for the events of each episode but will bring up plot points from previous episodes as needed to contextualize the current week’s events. For a spoiler-centric view, please turn to the podcast Kids’ Stuff for a detailed discussion.

Chucky – S1 E5 – “Little Little Lies”

It’s a meet-cute between Charles Lee Ray and Tiffany Valentine in the 1980s, but in the present, we catch up with those lovebirds who have been busy in the two weeks since Cult of Chucky. We also follow Jake, Devon, and Lexy as they are convinced they can solve their Chucky problem once and for all. However, secrets may threaten the Cult and the lives of the kids, particularly Junior, who is seemingly pushed toward a darker place.

How Was It?

Chucky – S1 E5 – “Little Little Lies” is another episode directed by Leslie Libman, who handled last week’s “Just Let Go.” The credited writers this week include executive producers Don Mancini, staff writer Kim Garland, with Harley Peyton and Rachael Paradis tackling the show for this episode.

While a fun episode full of exciting revelations, some cracks in the structure have begun to appear with this episode lacking an overall focus that made the first four episodes so strong. The narrative throughline is missing this week – particularly through the injection of a pair of returning characters and the need to get viewers up to speed on what is going on. The episode is pretty much the calm before the storm of the rest of the season, but it lacks a strong story, essentially coasting on some reveals with little narrative momentum until the end.

With that being said, seeing Jennifer Tilly and Fiona Dourif return to their respective roles of Tiffany Valentine and Nica!Chucky is quite enjoyable and their sequences are definitely fanservice in a number of ways. However, it does cause the episode to feel disjointed, particularly given the relative denouement produced in the plotline with the trio of Jake (Zackary Arthur), Devon (Bjorgvin Arnarson), and Lexy (Alyvia Alyn Lind). Their scenes are genuinely strong, funny, and set up some future conflict with Junior (Teo Briones), but the dramatic irony of viewers knowing Chucky’s fate results in no real tension for viewers. Thankfully, the episode’s ending returns things back to the status quo and promises major developments for the final three episodes.

Chucky - S1 E5 screencap - Image depicting Logan restraining Junior by the arm, from Syfy
Junior (Teo Briones) and Logan (Devon Sawa) have some issues to work out. Courtesy of SyFy.

It was an episode full of revelations about relationships between characters. We learn about the first meeting of Charles Lee Ray and Tiffany Valentine in the 1980s, complete with campy dubbing and VHS artifacts. We also learn Bree’s secret that she has been hiding from her family, while we see the tension explode in the Wheeler home and Logan begins to seemingly shift into his brother over these past couple of episodes. Plus, Jake seems to find a little happiness. We’ll see how long that lasts.

So while a lot seems to be revealed in this episode, it more or less feels like a collection of scenes as opposed to a story. Had there been a strong central narrative this would have been an incredible episode. Even with the ridiculously campy dub of young Charles and Tiffany.

3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

Chucky – S1 E5 – Kill Count and Spotlight

A number of kills in the past and present this week. Chucky – S1 E5 features a stabbing, a corpse of a victim, a slashing of the throat, and a beheading. Quite an episode for murders. We also get treated to some flashbacks to Nica Pierce’s backstory, but those kills don’t count here.

Seeds of Chucky

Some elements of this week’s episode are callbacks to previous installments of the series. They may hint at the return of key figures from the past. Some other references to other horror classics may sneak in as well. Here are some of the highlights.

  • This week’s title card features hearts and hearts. You know, both kinds.
  • Jennifer Tilly and Fiona Dourif make their return to the series in this episode. Plus Fiona plays two characters in this episode – which is absoutely crazy when you figure it who.
  • The timeline of the episode is confirmed to be in 2017, about two weeks after Cult of Chucky.
  • We encounter another Good Guy doll with a familiar name this week. You may remember a Tommy from Child’s Play 2.
  • Shades of Hannibal can be found in this episode. A psychological appointment evokes the series that Don Mancini wrote on. Particularly, it evokes a very specific character’s journey on the show. More on the podcast next week.
  • Diving around in medical waste and getting high isn’t too far out for Chucky. He took a hit off of Andy Barclay’s joint in Cult of Chucky.

We will be covering the show episode-by-episode on Kids’ Stuff – A Chucky Podcast. However, don’t expect spoilers in these written reviews. You can expect them to fly during the podcast. If you missed the latest show, follow it on Spotify, listen to it on Haunted MTL, or find it on your favorite podcast app.

David Davis is a writer, cartoonist, and educator in Southern California with an M.A. in literature and writing studies.

Movies n TV

When Your Mother Dates Creature Features, or What Lies Below

What Lies Below (2020) is a horror film written and directed by Braden R. Duemmler, starring Ema Horvath, Trey Tucker, and Mena Suvari.

Published

on

What Lies Below (2020) is a horror film written and directed by Braden R. Duemmler. This TV-MA film stars Ema Horvath, Trey Tucker, and Mena Suvari. The film is available on Hoopla, Tubi TV, Peacock Premium Plus, the Roku Channel, History Vault, and Amazon Prime Video.

Libby (Ema Horvath) returns to her family’s lake house before leaving for college. Her mother (Mena Suvari as Michelle Wells) uses this opportunity to have Libby meet her boyfriend (Trey Tucker as John Smith). Despite the draw of a handsome scientist, the more Libby learns about the man, the stranger he seems.

A woman emerges from a lake, looking into the water with visible confusion.
Ema Horvath as Liberty (Libby) Wells

What I Like about What Lies Below

The film balances the line between sci-fi and supernatural horror. One of those options seems to fit slightly better, but What Lies Below doesn’t feel the need to tell its audience some objective truth. Instead, it respects the viewer to come to their own conclusion.

Ema Horvath has the most to work with and provides an interesting character in Libby. Libby remains a reserved and shy character, displaying an unhealthy dose of longing that requires subtle habits and glances to communicate her thoughts. Yet, the viewer often knows what she’s thinking.

What Lies Below
  • What Lies Below
  • What Lies Below
  • Audience Rating: Unrated (Not Rated)

Last update on 2025-01-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

That said, there’s a level of camp across all the performances. It’s hard to say if this is an intentional choice but viewing it as an intentional choice adds to these performances. However, it’s worth mentioning this as a hard selling point.

Without diving into spoilers, the ending did surprise me to some degree. I was wrong about how hard What Lies Below would end. In short, this film gets surprisingly dark. It doesn’t linger in that darkness, but What Lies Below doesn’t compromise its plot for a comforting conclusion.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

Body horror seems to be the most obvious trigger to mention. It’s less the body mutating kind of horror and more the parasite growing inside the body kind. Most of this remains implied, or we see only the aftermath, but the points seem clear.

A sexual assault leads to a general shift in the film. Part of this assault is handled with uncomfortable realism as the survivor doubts the severity of the assault and receives pushback when she reveals the truth. While this realism certainly has its place, it also deserves a warning.

A muscular man looks at the viewer, swaying against the backdrop of a forest
Trey Tucker as Professionally Good-Looking Hunk Scientist John Smith

What I Dislike about What Lies Below

This film might have been better served diving into its campier side instead of loosely adding those moments. Ultimately, the performances suffer from a lack of commitment, teetering between a serious approach or a campier execution.

What Lies Below is far from a high-budget film. While it can hide its lower budget, there are clear moments that visibly show the strain. If it committed to the camp or creativity of many B-films, it might better haunt its viewers. 

What Lies Below only loosely attempts to channel the creature feature. It occasionally introduces something more bestial and inhuman but doesn’t give more than a glimpse. With the revelry given to lampreys and the title, I wrongly suspected something within the watery depths to show.

While the film remains dark, I won’t particularly call it haunting. While the seductive creature isn’t as common as its female counterpart, it’s far from an untested concept. The major problem with What Lies Below is that it doesn’t do enough to stand out or linger in the mind. Instead, it hints at something brewing, smacks you with a dark end, and calls it a day.

A kraken devours a ship whole, filtered in a brownish tint.

Final Thoughts

What Lies Below implements elements of a memorable creature feature but fails to haunt its viewers. While its restraint in explaining its plot deserves respect, it doesn’t supplement that with something terrifying enough to break the surface. It’s hard to recommend this film to eager viewers looking for a creature in its feature. Instead, it might better suit an audience who craves a subtle mystery by the lakeside.
2.5 out of 5 stars (2.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Perfect Reboot of The Franchise: Halloween H20 (1997) Review

Published

on

Oh, the 90s, the renaissance of the slasher genre after it crashed and burned in the mid-80s. Halloween H20 is the seventh installment in the Halloween franchise. It hits a reset button on the canon, which utilizes the strong points of the decade. Without any further ado, let’s dive in! 

Plot

We start with seemingly random characters as they die at the hands of Michael Myers, who is back for vengeance. He wants to find Laurie and is not willing to let anyone else stand in his way. Here is where the franchise diverges into a different canon that ignores all the movies after the second one.

After a wonderful tribute to the late Donald Pleasance we see Laurie. She is now a headmistress at a boarding school in California, with a new name and a son. Laurie appears functioning on the outside, but she is still traumatized by the past events, medicating both with prescription meds and alcohol. Not even her love interest (a fellow teacher) knows anything about her past. 

Her son John doesn’t understand the severity of what his mother has been through. He repeatedly tells her to get over it (not the brightest moment despite him being a teenage boy). More teenage characters are introduced in the form of his girlfriend played by Michelle Williams in her Dawson’s Creek prime, and two friends. 

John and the group want to stay at the empty boarding school while everyone else goes on a camping trip. What they think will be a romantic couples’ weekend turns into anything but. Michael catches up to Laurie and finds his way into the premises. What ensues is a blood-shed with some creative kills and full-on suspense.

Laurie takes a stand against Michael as she chases him down axe in hand, ready to finish this once and for all. This leads to a showdown with a glorious finale as Laurie decapitates Michael, seemingly ending his reign for good (or so we think). 

Overall thoughts

Halloween H20 is a great overhaul of a franchise that was running out of steam. It encapsulates everything about the 90s, from the camera work to the soundtrack to the cheesy one-liners. It has a star-studded cast of the sweethearts of the decade and who could be mad at Jamie Lee Curtis’s comeback? 

This movie takes an interesting approach to Laurie’s character. She spends the second movie kind of helpless waiting for someone to save her, however this time she takes the lead and faces her trauma head-on. Other characters have just enough development to make you care for their survival. The atmosphere is very reminiscent of the first one as well, with a bit of a slow burn before the big finish. 

Ultimately, this is the most entertaining instalment of the franchise and has a lot of rewatchability for those movie nights. Slasher 2.0 at its best. 

Sale
H20: Halloween: Twenty Years Later (Dimension Collector’s Series)
  • Jamie Lee Curtis, Josh Hartnett, Adam Arkin (Actors)
  • Steve Miner (Director) – Debra Hill (Writer) – Bob Weinstein (Producer)
  • English (Subtitle)

Last update on 2025-01-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut, or The New Daughter

The New Daughter (2009) is a PG-13 horror film & Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut based on John Connolly’s short story of the same name.

Published

on

The New Daughter (2009) is a PG-13 horror film and Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut. The film is based on John Connolly’s short story of the same name. The New Daughter stars Kevin Costner, Ivana Baquero, Samantha Mathis, and Gattlin Griffith. As of this review, the film is available on VUDU Free, The CW, Hoopla, Tubi TV, Freevee, and Plex, with additional purchase options.

John James (Kevin Costner) moves his children to a rural South Carolina town to start anew after his wife leaves him. Louisa James (Ivana Baquero) can’t stand this change, and Sam James (Gattlin Griffith) doesn’t understand why his mother isn’t with them. But after finding a burial mound, their attitudes suddenly switch. As John uncovers more of their new home’s history, he realizes there’s much to fear.

A man stares outside, half covered in darkness. He hold a shotgun, ready for something.
Kevin Costner as John James

What I Like About Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut

Despite its 2009 release date, the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror Films nominated it for the Saturn Awards’ Best DVD Release in 2011. As Luiso Berdejo’s feature-length debut, the film manages to hold an audience with a tight script and direction.

The acting sells this ominous mystery, which might otherwise become obscure amongst others in the genre. In particular, Kevin Costner’s John James and Ivana Baquero’s Louisa James center The New Daughter around their characters’ strained father-daughter relationship.

Ultimately, The New Daughter thrives in its atmosphere and execution. If we take the film plot point by plot point, The New Daughter doesn’t break the mold. Between Luiso Berdejo’s direction and the writing of John Travis and John Connolly, however, the film executes this uncomfortable tension that invests viewers.

The New Daughter
  • English (Subtitle)

Last update on 2025-01-28 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

It’s in The New Daughter‘s execution where it haunts its audience. There’s this uncomfortable powerlessness as John attempts to protect his family against the horrors in the mound and its corrupting influence.

The ending might seem uncommitted, but I would disagree. The film executes a balance between hope and horror that leads to ambiguity but doesn’t leave the audience dissatisfied. A bolder film might conclude with an unhappy ending, but The New Daughter gives a sliver of hope in its dark ending.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

A cat dies in the film. The act isn’t shown, but I understand this can be a dealbreaker. In loose connection, there are also animal carcasses.

There’s a loose and underdeveloped connection to Native American mythology, following along the idea of “Indian (Native Americans) burial grounds.” While this initial thought proves inaccurate, it still holds familiar plot points that might irk some.

There are some strange decisions revolving around Louisa. Needless to say, a part of the plot revolves around her beginning puberty. While nothing is explicit, the creatures require a mate, which suggests sexual assault.

The New Daughter written below. Behind is a poorly lit house with a girl standing to the left hand side. In front, a man stands looking away from her.
The New Daughter Alt Cover

What I Dislike about Luiso Berdejo’s Feature-Length Debut

The aesthetic of the burial mound doesn’t seem particularly noteworthy. This becomes a problem when it looks like any hill in a forest. I don’t particularly see how the James family recognizes this as something strange and worth fixating on. As the film progresses, there are obvious reasons, but the aesthetic doesn’t execute this strangeness.

As addressed above, the premise remains familiar and safe, perhaps too safe. A family moves into a rural home, escaping a past withheld from the audience. The mother is out of the picture, and the father struggles to connect with his young daughter. I don’t subscribe to the idea that these are lazy points, but it might seem formulaic with how thick it dominates the film’s beginning.

A kraken devouring a boat. The art looks dated with a weathered filter over the design.

Final Thoughts

The New Daughter is an impressive feature-length debut but one with notable flaws. There’s a familiarity and safety in the plot that hinders what could have been. However, the ominous mystery and acting provide the needed execution to create a haunting experience. If you’re looking for a horror following a terrified family against supernatural creatures, The New Daughter delivers.

3.5 out of 5 stars (3.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending