Episode four of Dexter Original Sin was an interesting one. It was equal parts funny and upsetting.

It also brought up an issue I’ve always had with Dexter.

Let’s discuss.

The story

Our story doesn’t waste any time, starting with the kidnapped boy, Jimmy Powell, hanging dead from a bridge.

This crime scene turns out to be a little too much even for Dexter. So, he decides to go hunting. He discovers a killer for hire called Mad Dog. And let me save you the Google. Yes, that is Joe Pantoliano who played Cypher in The Matrix.

So desperate to feel better, Dexter maybe rushes things a little bit. Which, it should surprise no one, leads to a hilarious and disastrous result.

What worked

There has always been a part of the later seasons of Dexter that bothered me. Spoilers ahead.

When Deb learns about Dexter’s Dark Passenger, she goes right off the deep end. This includes, among other things, heroin use. Which always seemed out of character for me. Now, finding out she was experimenting with drugs as a teen, that makes more sense. While I won’t say this is as good as Deep Space 9 retconning the infamous stage hand incident in Troubles with Tribbles, it was nice.

I also really enjoyed Joe Pantoliano’s character, Mad Dog. He was funny in just the right way. Not slapstick. Not over the top, because that never would have fit here. But he’s animated and joyful in a way that no other character is. He’s clearly got his priorities right, as we can see when he begs Dex not to smash his guitar. He was just so fun. And this episode needed this levity since the rest of it was so heavy.

As we discussed, this episode started with a poor dead boy. This caused both Dexter and Harry to completely ignore Deb. Furious, she shouts what must have been the best and most emotionally devastating line in the series so far.

“How am I supposed to compete with a dead kid?”

Now the question I’m left with, the question that I’m sure the writers intended to leave us with, is this. Does she mean the dead boy her dad’s investigating? Or does she mean her dead brother?

Does she know she has a dead brother?

I felt like these two elements, the levity brought by Mad Dog and the heavy death of the little boy worked really well together. It keeps the story balanced, keeps it from being too much.

What didn’t work

While this episode cleared up something about Deb for me, it also brought to light something I’ve never appreciated about the character Dexter.

He’s not a sociopath.

A sociopath is a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience. They would not, generally, have a different response to a child being killed than an adult. But Dexter has always had that issue.

It makes him a better person, but it shows a misunderstanding of the character in the books. And, frankly, a misunderstanding of the condition.

I also need to complain about the melon scene. Normally, everyone knows the point of smashing a melon in forensics. Whether accurate to the real world or not, melons are used to show what might happen if someone’s skull is crushed. The point is to see the difference in different heights, and where the blood splatter might go.

If one is going to spray blood where they want it to be or put a little metal plate on one melon so that it doesn’t break naturally, then it defeats the whole purpose of dropping them.

Now, some of you might think this was the point of the scene. Dexter is very new at this. Maybe he was doing it wrong, showing a lack of understanding of the process. I have two issues with this. One, Dexter is pre-med, he should have known better. And two, Masuka is not new. And he was standing right there the whole time. Why didn’t he say something? This was just a clumsy and confusing scene in an episode that was otherwise well done.

All in all, this was another good episode. I loved the blend of funny and heartbreaking. I loved the special guest star. And I loved the cliffhanger ending. I can’t wait to see what happens next.

(4 / 5)

Written and directed by Chris Von Hoffmann, Devil’s Workshop is a horror drama released in 2022. This R-rated film stars Radha Mitchell, Timothy Granaderos, Sarah Coffey, and Emile Hirsch. As of this review, it’s available on Freevee.

Clayton (Timothy Granaderos) is a struggling actor on the verge of the biggest role in his life. After receiving a callback, he takes this opportunity seriously, seeking out a real demonologist to better understand the role. However, Eliza (Radha Mitchell) forces him to experience the spiritual… and the demonic.

What I Like About Devil’s Workshop

The chemistry between Eliza and Clayton remains the highlight of the film. Radha Mitchell’s Eliza evokes a mystique that makes it easy to believe Clayton’s desire to learn more. Timothy Granaderos’ Clayton captures the character’s insecurities while giving just enough for viewers to sense something deeper.

Devil’s Workshop seems to accomplish much with a limited budget. The special effects (though limited) work surprisingly well. While it wouldn’t be an issue if it indulged in camp, Devil’s Workshop seeks to elevate its horror without undermining the tone.

As the plot unfolds, there’s just enough reason to rewatch the film and catch some of the groundwork leading to that conclusion. I am surprised at how well the film holds up in this regard, keeping the viewers engaged despite a slower burn.

There’s something genuinely haunting about the ending, as Clayton’s backstory and the demon’s manipulation synergize to make a few disturbing scenes. The success of this synergy stems from the odd relationship that Eliza and Clayton develop within the film, becoming confidants to drastically different ends.

Tired Tropes and Triggers

Clayton stands at a particularly low point in his life, working through his unresolved family issues and feeling like a failure. This insecurity leads to Clayton’s troubles.

A sexual assault occurs between a female assaulter and male victim. Unlike many films that explore this subject matter, this assault isn’t a tool for a cheap laugh. However, beyond the cruelty of the act, it isn’t explored to any degree beyond the shock and horror of the act.

What I Dislike about Devil’s Workshop

Emile Hirsch’s Donald plays a rival to Clayton, but the performance lingers on camp. Making the character more jarring, he leads a subplot with little value to the story. While I understand that Donald acts as a foil and antagonist, he’s rarely pitted against Clayton. Instead, he takes away from the actual plot.

Another potential reason for this subplot is to allow Sarah Coffey’s Nikki to shine. As a friend to Donald, the character makes his subplot tolerable. However, it still provides no substance to the plot. It seems like a massive misstep to waste her talent as a side character on an irrelevant deviation.

If the above issues suggest a desire to expand the film’s runtime, exploring the occult themes in Devil’s Workshop would better serve the plot. Devil’s Workshop works best when following its demonic lore and rituals, so why not dive further into the diabolical? Clayton sought to study a demonologist for the role, and demonology remains a lightly explored topic.

The mix between campy and more serious performances doesn’t create a cohesive film. Perhaps these campier scenes bring levity, but the film doesn’t linger in its darker material long enough to require these intermissions.

Final Thoughts

Devil’s Workshop provides a disturbing horror within a tight runtime, requiring little to earn its investment. The low budget shows in places but rarely where it matters most, pulling off a traumatizing ending to earn its place. While it’s far from the most terrifying film, it’s an unnerving watch for those interested. The one issue I return to is this odd subplot following a pointless character.
(3 / 5)

“The Demon of Memes” is the second episode of supernatural drama Evil’s season 3, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.

The assessors investigate another urban legend following the mystery of Wandering Jack. David (Mike Colter) receives a task from the friends of the Vatican. Lynn (Brooklyn Shuck) learns that a friend might be in danger from Wandering Jack. Andy (Patrick Brammell) gets an offer he can’t refuse.

What I Like about “The Demon of Memes”

David’s montage at the beginning of the episode truly evokes the monotony of his duties, requiring little telling to show us what’s making him disillusioned. It’s not revolutionary, but it’s an effective tool.

“The Demon of Memes” establishes a key conflict in David’s duties as the “friends of the Vatican” plan to use him to various ends. That directly leads to Brian d’Arcy James’ return as Victor LeConte. James brings an uncertainty of motives reminiscent of Michael Emerson’s Leland. While not villainous, LeConte provides a dangerous manipulation to each task, obscuring his motives. 

LeConte’s discussion of human evil evokes the heart of the series. Evil suggests some ambiguity in the supernatural element (less so as the series progresses), but it hardly makes the results different. Evil exists, regardless of demonic origin. I appreciate this added complexity, even if I prefer the tension and spectacle of the supernatural elements.

While I’m not always satisfied with how Evil handles Andy, the character works well in “The Demon of Memes.” As the audience learns of the true scheme, tension builds as Andy moves closer to success. Beyond this tension, Andy and Kristen (Katja Herbers) make genuine strides in their relationship.

Sheryl’s (Christine Lahti) new occupation remains a pleasant delight, equal parts cartoonishly evil and believable. Perhaps it’s the dark tone of the series, but it feels like an obvious extension of the antagonism Evil creates, requiring an absurd amount of work to make the world slightly more miserable.

While “The Demon of Memes” doesn’t evoke a haunting fear, it builds tension as a clear direction unfolds. In terms of direct horror, the episode focuses on a Slenderman-like urban legend. While it’s not particularly scary, seeing this legend through Lynn’s eyes earns more weight.

Tired Tropes & Triggers

Nothing particularly stands out as concerning or evocative. David’s (now Father Acosta) lack of fulfillment and desire for a more active role in fighting the supernatural might rub some the wrong way. But that’s largely the premise of the show.

The name “The Demon of Memes” remains inaccurate. Unlike “The Demon of Death,” this episode doesn’t provide an alternative to dissect. Another nitpick is that the “demon” in question isn’t of “memes” but of “urban legends.”

What I Dislike about “The Demon of Memes”

Aside from the lack of proper horror, I don’t particularly have an issue with “The Demon of Memes” I find worth mentioning. The names don’t yet match the demon of focus, but that’s a minor point that doesn’t directly address the writing, scenes, or acting, which remain strong.

If there’s one issue to pull, “The Demon of Memes” focuses more on what’s to come. In fact, the content suggests a season premiere more than “The Demon of Death.”

Another more relevant point is the underwhelming procedural plot. It’s not bad; however, the Wandering Jack pales in comparison to its inspirations (such as Slenderman).

Final Thoughts

“The Demon of Memes” sets a strong foundation for the future. While it doesn’t haunt the viewer as much as other episodes might, it builds a dire future development with the dark humor Evil thrives. In some aspects of the development, This episode feels more like the season premiere than the second episode.
(3.5 / 5)