Beware: There are some spoilers about Scream (2022) This is not a complete scene by scene direction but there will be talk about specific deaths
My favorite scary movie? Master of Disguise (Source: IMDB)
A hard legacy to uphold
Even, in my opinion, I know a lot of horror fans would agree that Ws Craven is the best horror movie director of all time. Not to disparage names like Hooper, Romero, or Carpenter, but Wes Craven is my fave horror director. He directed some underrated films like ‘The People Under the Stairs’, ‘Deadly Friend’, and ‘Shocker’ (a personal favorite). He also started not one, but two legendary slasher franchises. The main difference in one aspect between ‘Scream’ and ‘NOES’ is that Wes directed the prior four in this franchise. So many people, myself included, were a bit hesitant when Radio Silence was tasked to direct this installment.
Now don’t get me wrong, I have no issues with them as directors. In fact, I rather enjoyed ‘Ready or Not’. So with them attached, I did feel better. Plus they did say they would try to honor his legacy. And after getting a chance to see it…they did honor his legacy. It was nice to see that you can see their own touches and spin on it, but with enough there from movies past to show the love and respect.
Even for me, high school was not this scary.
There is so much good about this movie to talk about. First off we have to talk about the new cast. They all felt new without just taking the place of past tropes or characters from the other movies. To be fair, other than Jack Quaid (who I love in The Boys), I was not familiar with them as much, which worked in their favor with me. To me, it made them all feel equal in danger and made me wonder if they would survive from one attack to the next. It made for some harrowing moments, especially at the climax.
Another thing the cast was able to do was to carry the majority of the movie by themselves. With the exception of Dewey, the rest of the legacy trio was not there for a good chunk of the movie. Other than small cameos at the start, we did not see Gale until about halfway through and Sidney wasn’t even there until the third act. So with what the cast was able to do on their own, it makes me want to see them more if the powers that be decide to go ahead with further sequels.
Speaking of possible sequels, the movie was able to end in a way that makes it possible for more. On the other hand, I think that Scream can go on with no other sequels and I would be ok. With no spoilers, the movie was able to leave it open as well as to tie up any loose ends. We shall see how they go.
The first cut may be the deepest, but the rest hurt just as bad.
However, the motive behind why the killers…killed was probably the weakest out of the trilogy. There were a lot of logic leaps and plot holes to get to that point. It was almost illogical in times. It came across mainly as ‘4chan and Reddit made me do it’, which came across as something of a cop-out. And even for the killers to meet, a lot of suspending disbelief and head-scratching had to happen.
An issue I see arising for any possible future sequels is the lack of motive. Every movie had one based in movie culture, including this one. Between horror movies in general, sequels, trilogies, remakes, and now the concept of ‘re-quels’, there seems to be a lack of theories to be used without recycling. Toxic fandom was even touched on, so scratch that off the list as well.
One other big thing that held the movie back in parts was the reliance on relatives. Nearly everyone was related somehow to a character in the original ‘Scream’. It was nice to see mentions of past characters or even a few cameos of characters past, there was an overreliance of relatives. It is hard to make your own mark as original people if everyone is connected to the past. Maybe one or two would have made that more impactful, but as many as the movie had watered down that concept.
MAJOR SPOILERS! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED
In the lead-up to the release of the movie, I was talking to a close friend of mine and fellow horror nerd about the big three legacy characters, Gale, Sid, and Dewey. We both agreed that one of them had to die. I forgot who he mentioned, but I did say I thought Sidney had to die. After surviving 4 movies, one or more had to die to get that unkillable aura around them. That role unfortunately had to fall on Dewey. While I had initially had picked the wrong one, the right choice was made.
Not the same man from the first (Source: Screen Rant)
Out of the three legacy characters, Dewey had the most growth and was the most three-dimensional out of all of them. Hell, you could argue that Sidney was the same character with no change, while Gale did have some minor changes. Dewey became the heart and soul of the franchise. He was a bumbling fool in the first who wasn’t even supposed to survive. By the time this installment came around, he was the antithesis of who he was. He became the most valuable one of the trio. I feel if one of the two women had died, it would not have changed feelings much. However, with Dewey sacrificing himself at the hospital, it made you think that maybe one of the other two might not make it. So in that way, Dewey had to die.
Final Thoughts
There was talk of not doing another Scream movie after the passing of Wes Craven, which I fully supported at the time. He was the glue and brought everything together, However, I was glad this was made. You could tell the directors respected Wes’s legacy and made the best movie they could. Even with the missteps the movie had, the positives far outweighed it. If this is the end, bravo. However, I would like to see more of the characters. If you are a fan of the franchise, I highly recommend this movie. If the original movie was Iron Man, this one is Avengers: Endgame.
As we near the end of the series, Dexter Original Sin is heating up. Emotions are running high, and the blood is pouring. But is the story keeping up with the gore? Let’s discuss.
As a warning, I found it impossible to review this episode without a few spoilers. You’ll see why. But if you haven’t yet seen this episode, proceed with caution.
The story
We begin our story with Dexter and Harry in the kitchen after a hard night of work for each of them. Dexter tries to tell Harry that he suspects Captain Spencer killed Jimmy Powell and kidnapped his own son. But Harry doesn’t want to hear it. He’s more concerned that Deb never came home from Gio’s apartment.
The reason she didn’t come home is because Gio invited her on a day trip. He says he has to go for work, but she can come along for the fun.
And fun she has, until she finds something on his boat she wasn’t supposed to see.
Meanwhile, Dexter is following Captain Spencer around. He eventually gives up to go rescue Deb, only to be called onto a SWAT call. One that turns deadly, and was orchestrated by the captain.
As if there wasn’t enough going on in this episode, LaGuerta and Harry are hunting the NHI killer. And we realize who the killer is just as Harry finds out as well. At least, we’re really supposed to think we know who it is.
What worked
At this point, we know that Captain Spencer abducted and murdered Jimmy Powell, and has now abducted his own son Nicky.
So, we already know the killer. And that’s always the big reveal, right?
Well, no. We might know that Spencer is the killer. But what we don’t know is why. What is he after? What does he want so much that he’s willing to not just kill innocent children, but his own son? These are the questions that will drive me to watch the next episode, and the one after that.
This was a great way to answer a question, but leave more questions in the wake of that answer. It’s the perfect way to keep up the momentum of a season.
I was also shocked and impressed by the demise of Laura Moser. No, that isn’t the spoiler, we all knew that was going to happen. We knew it since the first season of the original series. What I didn’t expect was how emotionally invested I was in this. By this time we’ve seen Laura in a way we’ve never seen her before. She is a loving mother and brave as hell. So now, for the first time, we can mourn her. It honestly reminded me strongly of when Dexter lost Rita in the original series. I am crushed.
What didn’t work
Now, we’ve got to talk about Harry. Or more specifically, we’ve got to talk about Christian Slater. Because he just wasn’t good in this episode. He was chewing the scenery so hard I’m surprised they didn’t need to replace the kitchen table. I know he’s a better actor than this, so it makes me wonder what the hell was happening. He was overly emotional. And not in a way a man stressed out might be, but in an overacting kind of way. The whole performance just felt off.
Finally, we’ve made it to the spoiler part. At least, I think we do. Given the events of this episode either we know that the NHI killer is Brian, Dexter’s older brother, or we’re really supposed to think it’s him.
I don’t like this either way. If it’s him, then this feels like a repeat of the first season of the original show in which he was revealed to be the Ice Truck Killer. We’ve done this before. But we know it can’t end with Dexter finding out who it is. He’d never heard the name Brian Moser before as an adult.
Last update on 2025-01-07 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
If it isn’t Brian, though, it feels like overkill. Showing him painting Laura’s nails with that same distinct color pattern. His therapist and nurse were among the victims. If it’s all misdirection, it’s too much misdirection. I honestly thought it was Brian as soon as I heard one of the victims was a therapist specializing in traumatized teens. We’re not dumb. We didn’t need to be beaten over the head with this.
Slater’s acting and the Brian storyline aside, I thought this was a great episode. I know the series could still disappoint me, but I’m holding onto hope. At least, like I said before, they can’t kill Dexter this time.
However, trying to fit in, Iris starts to discover a terrifying secret within this tight-knit group of friends. A deadly secret…
THOUGHTS ON COMPANION (SPOILER-FREE)
Never would I have thought I would be saying that a writer of ‘Fred: the TV Show’ and ‘Fred 3: Camp Fred’ wrote a damn fine film. But here we are.
Writer/director, Drew Hancock, created a funny, clever and interesting gem of a horror film. COMPANION is a great adventure film in the horror genre, focusing on the ideas of identity, self-preservation, the cogito, ergo sum of life, and women’s rights.
And, trust me, I know that sounds like a lot, but that’s pulled off by the superb writing and the acting – it flows together really well. It’s an incredibly precarious job to balance humor, horror and drama. If you go too hard with humor and it’s cringey. You give too much drama and it’s tonal dissonance. If there’s too much horror…well, that’s okay, actually.
But with heavy hitters with incredible comedic timing like Harvey Guillén and Jack Quaid, the cast only elevates the writing and story. Quaid and Sophie Thatcher have so much chemistry and work so well together that the drama feels authentic and raw. Thatcher is such an engaging actress, working with what could have been a very flat role. But she portrays Iris with such intelligence, wit and vulnerability, it sells the idea of COMPANION that would usually require more suspension of disbelief.
I liked the soundtrack by Hrishikesh Hirway. Both the original soundtrack and the songs chosen work well with the tone and plot. Super fun bop. You can tell that the song selections were picked with intent and care, for example, the Goo Goo Dolls’ song playing in Josh’s apartment.
The effects in COMPANION were terrific by being used sparingly but grotesquely, for example, the scene with the slow, tortuous scene with the candle. Most of it is practical, but there are some key scenes with CGI that are really well done.
BRAINROLL JUICE: THIS HAS VAGUE SPOILERS
I love horror films. Yeah, I know, big surprise. But this type of film highlights why horror is such an important and crucial part of our history and culture. Horror is a lens of a society of the times. Looking back, we can see what creatures scared us. What people were afraid of or should be afraid of.
Horror, by large, is a very social and progressive genre. Monster movies and mad scientist movies of the 1950’s were en vogue due to the rising fears of the atomic bomb and the Cold War. The same is true for the rise in space horror as we had the Space Race and landed on the moon.
Coralie Fargeat has been exploring this with great success with her most recent film, ‘The Substance‘, but first really dove into this with her fan-favorite, ‘Revenge‘. ‘Freaky‘ and ‘Happy Death Day‘, while comedic, explore girlhood, femininity and social expectations. ‘Don’t Breathe‘ turns the trope on it’s head (in a still gross way). ‘Babadook‘ shows the difficulty with being a mother, and ‘Hereditary‘ is a deep drama on matriarchal generational trauma.
Written like a person who understands the nuances of an “adult and juvenile human female” and is definitely not an alien
What does this have to do with horror and COMPANION? Well, pretty much everything. COMPANION is about what it means to be a woman. Her fears are real and reflect the fears of our society currently. Loss of agency. Loss of identity. Loss of her voice and decisions.
But like all good horror, it will stand the test of time. It will be on the right side of history, as they say. With an incel proxy as the villain and a woman learning about herself, it’s clear what Hancock envisioned for COMPANION. It’s a film about empowerment and reflection of our society right now. And unlike the newest Black Christmas, it doesn’t shove a diva cup down your throat.
“The Demon of Sex” is the third episode of Evil’s season 3, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.
The assessors investigate a new marriage that struggles with intimacy. Kristen (Katja Herbers) takes control of her family. Ben (Aasif Mandvi) has an existential crisis after facing plumbing difficulties. Sheryl (Christine Lahti) struggles with the new work culture. Sister Andrea (Andrea Martin) battles a demon.
Evil Season 3 Cover
What I Like about “The Demon of Sex”
Ben usually seems underutilized as a character, especially in personal development, but season 3 works hard to rectify that issue. A skeptic’s disillusionment is an obvious choice for this type of character, but the writing and Aasif Mandvi’s performance drive the execution. It also adds another dynamic to his character referenced throughout the series, if rarely shown again, in the Science League.
“The Demon of Sex” is also a good episode for Sheryl, who struggles and triumphs in her new position. While her character trajectory teeters back and forth, “The Demon of Sex” shows what her development can look like when given the attention it deserves.
Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API
“The Demon of Sex” also furthers the frenemy relationship between Kristen and Sister Andrea, providing ample material for both characters to explore. “The Demon of Sex” shows Kristen’s willingness to compromise and furthers Sister Andrea’s character flaws.
Leland (Michael Emerson) finally finds an attack that might work on Sister Andrea, beginning a plot thread to explore across the season. Commenting on this plot point might give credit to future episodes, but it’s a compelling example of Leland actually being devious and in control.
“The Demon of Sex” leans on Evil’s dark comedic tone, not intending to haunt the viewer but to entertain them. It dives further into the comical nature of corporate evil and marketing, showing a general shallowness in both arenas in which exploitation occurs. It’s dark, troubling, and entertaining without pulling its punches.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design
Tired Tropes and Triggers
In an episode titled “The Demon of Sex,” the titular demon seems to hold conflicting motives. First, it grows strong in the married couple’s abstinence, which suggests a different focus. But when acts become carnal, it’s the general kinkiness that makes the demon strong. Considering the couple talks about their troubles with a licensed therapist, it seems to evoke a general kink shame to the execution. However, the therapy also fails to resolve the underlying issues.
A slightly gory moment might unsettle some viewers, but it’s a single moment in an otherwise goreless episode.
A Nun with a Notebook to Save Your Marriage
What I Dislike about “The Demon of Sex”
As mentioned in a previous review, another demon seems to indicate a more direct concept of “sex,” while the motives of this demon seem more complex. It’s a minor point, but I can’t fathom why they didn’t connect this title with the more literal succubus that’s plagued this season already. Addressing that demon also seems like a more logical entry point as the audience sees what it’s been doing.
“The Demon of Sex” sets the groundwork for future plot points. While not a fault of the episode, it blends in the background, doing what it needs to and little more. I don’t mean to pretend this is a negative, but it doesn’t haunt the viewer like past or future episodes.
Final Thoughts
“The Demon of Sex” delivers but remains buried around more memorable episodes with more lasting power. It sets up key points for several characters and allows some to shine, but it doesn’t hold iconic moments to look back on. Ultimately, it functions as intended and keeps the audience eager for future developments.