Connect with us

Published

on

In 1975, Dan Curtis directed Trilogy of Terror, a made-for-television anthology horror film for ABC. It’s known for plenty of things. Each terror tale prominently featured actress Karen Black. The film also flipped the script a bit on date rape (subverting the Cosby technique, so to speak). However, let’s face it: Most of us tend to remember the film’s other mascot (besides Black), known as the Zuni fetish doll. While not the first creepy doll to grace people’s screens, Zuni is definitely one of the finest, most memorable and unrelenting. Frankly, his aim seems to involve little other than murdering Black’s character, who foolishly brought him into her home.

Oddly enough, I almost feel guilty about Zuni being my personal favorite aspect of the film. The other two stories definitely have more — you know — story going on. Still, the more childish viewer will likely embrace Zuni as the highest point of Trilogy of Terror. The straightforward danger he represents is omnipresent once he’s unleashed. In fact, it’s the sort of weird thing one could easily have irrational nightmares (or even conscious phobias about). Ever have an insect relentlessly hound you, instilling near panic in your brain whether it can sting you or not? It’s a little like that, only this is some dumb little creature in a movie. From what I understand, the Zuni fetish doll also appears in the sequel, which is simply called Trilogy of Terror II.

How Does “Zuni” Fare Against Other Demented Dolls?

As stated, there are many great dolls out there. Talky Tina from The Twilight Zone kicks considerable ass. Of course, you also have Chucky from the Child’s Play franchise (perhaps the most popular killer doll). You have the crazy puppets from Puppet Master, who themselves have fought The Demonic Toys. This list could go on. Honestly, Zuni — the Zunester, if you will — could probably do pretty well in a fight with those freaks. His frenetic energy and can-do attitude sort of speak for themselves. While not exactly 100% powerful, he proves formidable to average prey. If you could encounter Zuni in real life, there’s a decent chance your goose would get cooked!

If there were a true battle royale between Zuni and a bunch of other dolls, he’d be a serious contender for the final round, even if not the victor (that might be Talky Tina, who was curiously indestructible). In any case, it would be great to see him, Chucky, Annabelle, etc. face off in a no-holds-barred death match. I’d maybe give Zuni an advantage, like a little car he can ride in called “The Zune Buggy,” or something stupid like that. Of course, the porn industry would have to make their own parody version of this killer doll free-for-all, as they tend to do with damn near every other idea. After all, Zuni is already called a “fetish doll,” so the branding tie-in’s already right there. The possibilities are endless with these franchises!

What are your thoughts on Trilogy of Terror and the Zuni fetish doll? Let us know in the comments!

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

Review: ‘COMPANION’ – Do not watch the trailer! (2025)

Published

on

Okay, Mr. Drew Hancock, writer of Fred: the TV Show and Fred 3: Camp Fred. I hear you have a new, little horror film – COMPANION. Let’s give it a go.

And I am going to try as hard as possible not to spoil a goddamn thing since its marketing did the complete opposite.

PLOT OF COMPANION (SPOILER-FREE)

Iris (Sophie Thatcher) and boyfriend, Josh (Jack Quaid) travel to upstate New York to have a friends get-away with Josh’s best friends: Eli, (Harvey Guillén), Patrick (Lukas Gage), Kat (Megan Suri) and Kat’s boyfriend, Sergey (Rupert Friend).

However, trying to fit in, Iris starts to discover a terrifying secret within this tight-knit group of friends. A deadly secret…

THOUGHTS ON COMPANION (SPOILER-FREE)

Never would I have thought I would be saying that a writer of ‘Fred: the TV Show’ and ‘Fred 3: Camp Fred’ wrote a damn fine film. But here we are.

Writer/director, Drew Hancock, created a funny, clever and interesting gem of a horror film. COMPANION is a great adventure film in the horror genre, focusing on the ideas of identity, self-preservation, the cogito, ergo sum of life, and women’s rights.

And, trust me, I know that sounds like a lot, but that’s pulled off by the superb writing and the acting – it flows together really well. It’s an incredibly precarious job to balance humor, horror and drama. If you go too hard with humor and it’s cringey. You give too much drama and it’s tonal dissonance. If there’s too much horror…well, that’s okay, actually.

But with heavy hitters with incredible comedic timing like Harvey Guillén and Jack Quaid, the cast only elevates the writing and story. Quaid and Sophie Thatcher have so much chemistry and work so well together that the drama feels authentic and raw. Thatcher is such an engaging actress, working with what could have been a very flat role. But she portrays Iris with such intelligence, wit and vulnerability, it sells the idea of COMPANION that would usually require more suspension of disbelief.

Harvey Guillen in a dinosaur outfit and it says, "Harvey Guillen is perfect."

I liked the soundtrack by Hrishikesh Hirway. Both the original soundtrack and the songs chosen work well with the tone and plot. Super fun bop. You can tell that the song selections were picked with intent and care, for example, the Goo Goo Dolls’ song playing in Josh’s apartment.

The effects in COMPANION were terrific by being used sparingly but grotesquely, for example, the scene with the slow, tortuous scene with the candle. Most of it is practical, but there are some key scenes with CGI that are really well done.

BRAINROLL JUICE: THIS HAS VAGUE SPOILERS

I love horror films. Yeah, I know, big surprise. But this type of film highlights why horror is such an important and crucial part of our history and culture. Horror is a lens of a society of the times. Looking back, we can see what creatures scared us. What people were afraid of or should be afraid of.

Horror, by large, is a very social and progressive genre. Monster movies and mad scientist movies of the 1950’s were en vogue due to the rising fears of the atomic bomb and the Cold War. The same is true for the rise in space horror as we had the Space Race and landed on the moon.

Movies of the ’60’s and ’70’s had serial killers, delinquents, social rights, and the pearl-clutching fear of losing our innocence as a nation and losing our good, Christian values.

The 70’s and 80’s saw the fear of the faceless stranger, sexual deviance, as well as our growing concern of the expanding powers of corporations.

And so on and so on (this could be an entire article itself).

However, I find this new twist on an old genre interesting – a woman’s story. From the exploitation revenge flicks of the ’70’s to the girl-power vibe of the 90’s and early 2000’s, AFAB stories are getting more attention. More realistic and substantial attention.

Iris messed up and looking pissed while emojis and cutesy weapons are all around her and it says, "living her #girlboss era"

Coralie Fargeat has been exploring this with great success with her most recent film, ‘The Substance‘, but first really dove into this with her fan-favorite, ‘Revenge‘. ‘Freaky‘ and ‘Happy Death Day‘, while comedic, explore girlhood, femininity and social expectations. ‘Don’t Breathe‘ turns the trope on it’s head (in a still gross way). ‘Babadook‘ shows the difficulty with being a mother, and ‘Hereditary‘ is a deep drama on matriarchal generational trauma.

Obviously exploring themes of the AFAB horror experience isn’t a new idea, the exploitation of a woman’s story is starting to feel strained and gross. Currently, women are facing a tremendous push back on their rights. From losing the right to choose in a wild turn of events as Roe v Wade was overturned in 2022, to the most recent (at the time of this review) removal of women in the government, a senseless war on diversity and protections in the workplace, and the guttural shout of, “fuck you!” to transwomen and literally putting them in danger of starring in their very own rape-revenge true story.

Written like a person who understands the nuances of an “adult and juvenile human female” and is definitely not an alien

What does this have to do with horror and COMPANION? Well, pretty much everything. COMPANION is about what it means to be a woman. Her fears are real and reflect the fears of our society currently. Loss of agency. Loss of identity. Loss of her voice and decisions.

Iris from Companion is speaking German while looking beat up

But like all good horror, it will stand the test of time. It will be on the right side of history, as they say. With an incel proxy as the villain and a woman learning about herself, it’s clear what Hancock envisioned for COMPANION. It’s a film about empowerment and reflection of our society right now. And unlike the newest Black Christmas, it doesn’t shove a diva cup down your throat.

And all that from a guy who wrote Fred 3.

Fred 3: Camp Fred
  • Factory sealed DVD
  • Jake Weary, Carlos Knight, Siobhan Fallon Hogan (Actors)
  • Jonathan M Judge (Director) – Robert Zemeckis (Producer)

Last update on 2025-02-04 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

BOTTOMLINE FOR COMPANION

A funny, terrifying and adventurous romp into what it means to be yourself.

5 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

The Formal Introduction of Evil’s “The Demon of Sex”

“The Demon of Sex” is the third episode of Evil’s season 3. The assessors investigate a new marriage that struggles with intimacy.

Published

on

“The Demon of Sex” is the third episode of Evil’s season 3, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.

The assessors investigate a new marriage that struggles with intimacy. Kristen (Katja Herbers) takes control of her family. Ben (Aasif Mandvi) has an existential crisis after facing plumbing difficulties. Sheryl (Christine Lahti) struggles with the new work culture. Sister Andrea (Andrea Martin) battles a demon.

Evil written in bold, a snake reaches for an apple. Beneath reads Season 3
Evil Season 3 Cover

What I Like about “The Demon of Sex”

Ben usually seems underutilized as a character, especially in personal development, but season 3 works hard to rectify that issue. A skeptic’s disillusionment is an obvious choice for this type of character, but the writing and Aasif Mandvi’s performance drive the execution. It also adds another dynamic to his character referenced throughout the series, if rarely shown again, in the Science League.

“The Demon of Sex” is also a good episode for Sheryl, who struggles and triumphs in her new position. While her character trajectory teeters back and forth, “The Demon of Sex” shows what her development can look like when given the attention it deserves.

Sale
Evil: Season Three [DVD]
  • Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi (Actors)
  • Robert King (Director)
  • Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Sale
Evil: Season Three [Blu-Ray]
  • Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi (Actors)
  • Robert King (Director)
  • Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

“The Demon of Sex” also furthers the frenemy relationship between Kristen and Sister Andrea, providing ample material for both characters to explore. “The Demon of Sex” shows Kristen’s willingness to compromise and furthers Sister Andrea’s character flaws.

Leland (Michael Emerson) finally finds an attack that might work on Sister Andrea, beginning a plot thread to explore across the season. Commenting on this plot point might give credit to future episodes, but it’s a compelling example of Leland actually being devious and in control.

“The Demon of Sex” leans on Evil’s dark comedic tone, not intending to haunt the viewer but to entertain them. It dives further into the comical nature of corporate evil and marketing, showing a general shallowness in both arenas in which exploitation occurs. It’s dark, troubling, and entertaining without pulling its punches.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

In an episode titled “The Demon of Sex,” the titular demon seems to hold conflicting motives. First, it grows strong in the married couple’s abstinence, which suggests a different focus. But when acts become carnal, it’s the general kinkiness that makes the demon strong. Considering the couple talks about their troubles with a licensed therapist, it seems to evoke a general kink shame to the execution. However, the therapy also fails to resolve the underlying issues.

A slightly gory moment might unsettle some viewers, but it’s a single moment in an otherwise goreless episode.

A nun smiles at someone not revealed in the image, holding a notebook.
A Nun with a Notebook to Save Your Marriage

What I Dislike about “The Demon of Sex”

As mentioned in a previous review, another demon seems to indicate a more direct concept of “sex,” while the motives of this demon seem more complex. It’s a minor point, but I can’t fathom why they didn’t connect this title with the more literal succubus that’s plagued this season already. Addressing that demon also seems like a more logical entry point as the audience sees what it’s been doing.

“The Demon of Sex” sets the groundwork for future plot points. While not a fault of the episode, it blends in the background, doing what it needs to and little more. I don’t mean to pretend this is a negative, but it doesn’t haunt the viewer like past or future episodes.

A kraken emerges from the sea to devour a ship. A brown tint suggests an old map marking

Final Thoughts

“The Demon of Sex” delivers but remains buried around more memorable episodes with more lasting power. It sets up key points for several characters and allows some to shine, but it doesn’t hold iconic moments to look back on. Ultimately, it functions as intended and keeps the audience eager for future developments.

3 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

A Journey from Cosmic Horror to Shell Beach, or Dark City (1998)

Dark City (1998) is an R-rated Cosmic Horror film directed by Alex Proyas, often earning the fitting labels of tech noir.

Published

on

Dark City (1998) is a Cosmic Horror film directed by Alex Proyas, though I’ve seen labels of tech noir, which certainly fits. This R-rated film stars Rufus Sewell, Kiefer Sutherland, Jennifer Connelly, and William Hurt. As of this review, Dark City is available to Kanopy and Amazon Prime Video subscribers, with additional purchase options on other services. 

John Murdoch (Rufus Sewell) wakes up in a hotel bathtub, plagued with strange memories and amnesia. Chased by strangers, he follows his memories of Emma (Jennifer Connelly), avoiding those who hunt him in his desperate attempt to understand his situation. As mysterious forces hinder him, Dr. Daniel Schreber (Kiefer Sutherland) claims to know secrets that might help. Emma Murdock (Jennifer Connelly) haunts him.

Dark City written in red. A man stands crucified over a cross. Below are four people looking in different directions.
Dark City Alt Cover

What I Like about Dark City

Dark City earned 12 awards and an additional 19 nominations. These recognitions include the 1999 Saturn Award from the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films and the 1998 Bram Stoker Award. In short, Dark City earns a strong critical reception.

Part detective tale and part cosmic horror, Dark City lures its viewer in with its aesthetic and premise. I hesitate in saying that the mystery drives the film as the beginning narration does spill most of the finer points. However, Rufus Sewell delivers a performance of someone so overwhelmed and out of his element that the terror shows despite our knowledge. This film wants the audience to know the mystery, focusing on characters learning the truth to hook them.

Dark City (Director’s Cut) [Blu-ray]
  • Factory sealed DVD
  • Rufus Sewell, William Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland (Actors)
  • Alex Proyas (Director)
Dark City
  • Amazon Prime Video (Video on Demand)
  • Rufus Sewell, William Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland (Actors)
  • Alex Proyas (Director) – Alex Proyas (Writer) – Andrew Mason (Producer)

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Every performance nails its particular niche. From Kiefer Sutherland’s Dr. Schreber’s untrustworthy scientist to Jennifer Connelly’s mysterious Emma, each performance enriches the plot. This praise belongs to the entire cast, as many performances hold nuances that make sense after learning the entire truth.

Dark City maintains tension for most of its runtime, with the ending being an exception. That isn’t to say that the film fails to create a haunting story, but the focus shifts as the characters learn more about their situation. While both parts of the film accomplish their objectives, it does minimize the horror.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

At the backdrop of this story, there’s a serial killer murdering sex workers. It’s a familiar plotline, and Dark City doesn’t push against its familiarity in most aspects. However, the reasons behind this plot are somewhat more complex beyond simple shock value.

There was one notable voyeuristic nude scene, but the first naked body is Rufus Sewell’s John. Besides these moments, Dark City doesn’t lend itself to voyeurism. Instead, it prefers a largely sexless and detached perspective, which seems common among Lovecraftian-inspired properties.

A man in a trench coat stares in the distance. Behind him is a case.
Rufus Sewell as John Murdoch

What I Dislike about Dark City

As briefly mentioned, Dark City doesn’t deliver a traditional mystery because the beginning narration spoils most of that mystery. While this doesn’t inherently hinder the film, it’s a decision that doesn’t seem to make much sense. Most of the narration gets shown or told to the audience later. It’s as if the audience isn’t trusted to understand these elements. However, this film repeats this information or shows it with better execution, making the narration unnecessary.

Without divulging too much, the ending empowers a particular character that hinders the cosmic horror influences. It’s hard to believe the danger of cosmic forces when they prove to be your equal.

While not a fault of Dark City, The Matrix would focus more on empowering its main character through realizing some truth. Since The Matrix came out a year after this film, Dark City holds a stronger claim to the trend. However, the execution of this plot point goes to The Matrix. Despite the drastically different focus and genres, I can’t help but wonder how much The Matrix’s success has overshadowed this film’s lasting power.

A kraken devours a ship, rising from the sea.

Final Thoughts

Dark City creates a tense journey for audiences to follow, combining cosmic horror and tech noir to create something unique. It’s a cult classic that earned an award after its digital re-release because few films provide its unique mix of genres. If you crave a dark mystery where humanity must adapt to overcome the impossible with a flare of cosmic horror, this film might satisfy your craving.

4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending