Dark City (1998) is a Cosmic Horror film directed by Alex Proyas, though I’ve seen labels of tech noir, which certainly fits. This R-rated film stars Rufus Sewell, Kiefer Sutherland, Jennifer Connelly, and William Hurt. As of this review, Dark City is available to Kanopy and Amazon Prime Video subscribers, with additional purchase options on other services. 

John Murdoch (Rufus Sewell) wakes up in a hotel bathtub, plagued with strange memories and amnesia. Chased by strangers, he follows his memories of Emma (Jennifer Connelly), avoiding those who hunt him in his desperate attempt to understand his situation. As mysterious forces hinder him, Dr. Daniel Schreber (Kiefer Sutherland) claims to know secrets that might help. Emma Murdock (Jennifer Connelly) haunts him.

What I Like about Dark City

Dark City earned 12 awards and an additional 19 nominations. These recognitions include the 1999 Saturn Award from the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films and the 1998 Bram Stoker Award. In short, Dark City earns a strong critical reception.

Part detective tale and part cosmic horror, Dark City lures its viewer in with its aesthetic and premise. I hesitate in saying that the mystery drives the film as the beginning narration does spill most of the finer points. However, Rufus Sewell delivers a performance of someone so overwhelmed and out of his element that the terror shows despite our knowledge. This film wants the audience to know the mystery, focusing on characters learning the truth to hook them.

Dark City (Director’s Cut) [Blu-ray]

• Factory sealed DVD
• Rufus Sewell, William Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland (Actors)
• Alex Proyas (Director)

$8.79

Buy on Amazon

Dark City

• Amazon Prime Video (Video on Demand)
• Rufus Sewell, William Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland (Actors)
• Alex Proyas (Director) – Alex Proyas (Writer) – Andrew Mason (Producer)

$10.49

Buy on Amazon

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Every performance nails its particular niche. From Kiefer Sutherland’s Dr. Schreber’s untrustworthy scientist to Jennifer Connelly’s mysterious Emma, each performance enriches the plot. This praise belongs to the entire cast, as many performances hold nuances that make sense after learning the entire truth.

Dark City maintains tension for most of its runtime, with the ending being an exception. That isn’t to say that the film fails to create a haunting story, but the focus shifts as the characters learn more about their situation. While both parts of the film accomplish their objectives, it does minimize the horror.

Tired Tropes and Triggers

At the backdrop of this story, there’s a serial killer murdering sex workers. It’s a familiar plotline, and Dark City doesn’t push against its familiarity in most aspects. However, the reasons behind this plot are somewhat more complex beyond simple shock value.

There was one notable voyeuristic nude scene, but the first naked body is Rufus Sewell’s John. Besides these moments, Dark City doesn’t lend itself to voyeurism. Instead, it prefers a largely sexless and detached perspective, which seems common among Lovecraftian-inspired properties.

What I Dislike about Dark City

As briefly mentioned, Dark City doesn’t deliver a traditional mystery because the beginning narration spoils most of that mystery. While this doesn’t inherently hinder the film, it’s a decision that doesn’t seem to make much sense. Most of the narration gets shown or told to the audience later. It’s as if the audience isn’t trusted to understand these elements. However, this film repeats this information or shows it with better execution, making the narration unnecessary.

Without divulging too much, the ending empowers a particular character that hinders the cosmic horror influences. It’s hard to believe the danger of cosmic forces when they prove to be your equal.

While not a fault of Dark City, The Matrix would focus more on empowering its main character through realizing some truth. Since The Matrix came out a year after this film, Dark City holds a stronger claim to the trend. However, the execution of this plot point goes to The Matrix. Despite the drastically different focus and genres, I can’t help but wonder how much The Matrix’s success has overshadowed this film’s lasting power.

Final Thoughts

Dark City creates a tense journey for audiences to follow, combining cosmic horror and tech noir to create something unique. It’s a cult classic that earned an award after its digital re-release because few films provide its unique mix of genres. If you crave a dark mystery where humanity must adapt to overcome the impossible with a flare of cosmic horror, this film might satisfy your craving.

Episode four of Goosebumps The Vanishing is named after one of my least favorite of the original Goosebumps book series. I’m clearly in the minority since there are four Monster Blood books. And I’m sad to say that this episode very much lived down to the expectations the book set.

The story

We begin this episode with a flashback. Cece is excited to go to her debate group that Summer. She even brags to her fellow Type A teenage girlfriends. Then, she doesn’t get in.

That’s right, she’s been lying to everyone about going to debate class every day.

However, she still managed to get an interview for a college application. Too bad she gets sick at the meeting. She finds herself back at her mother’s apartment, throwing up in the sink. And if that wasn’t bad enough, the thing she throws up pulls itself out of the sink and tries to attack her.

What worked

I’m not going to lie, this was not a boring episode. Even scenes that were conversations among teen girls in a coffee shop were full of action. At no point did it struggle to keep my attention.

I was also pleased by how the Monster Blood creature looked. Or, whatever this thing is. The way it moved was eerie. The way the characters interacted with it was seamless. This effect was quite well done.

What didn’t work

Unfortunately, that’s where my praise for this episode ends. To start with, the monster still doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. I’ve complained about this in the last few episodes, so I won’t spend a lot of time on this. But it still does not make sense that this sentient spore went from possessing a person to a car to a cup, to then being puked up into its own body. A body made of blood, puke and kombucha.

I also complained last episode about Cece’s character. She was too perfect. And, as though this episode heard me, we now know that she was never as perfect as she was trying to seem.

However, as far as dark secrets for perfect Type A teens go, this one was weak and cliche. She’s lying to everyone about getting into some fancy debate team. And who hasn’t seen this? Who hasn’t seen this sort of thing before?

While there is nothing new under the sun, there are good ways to redo a cliche. And then, there’s this. It brought nothing new to the table.

This same complaint can be applied to the big conflict of this episode. As of now, we have three groups fighting the same monster from different levels. Frankie, Cece and Devin are being chased by the Monster Blood. Alex and CJ are aware something is wrong, but so far they only think it involves the car. And Anthony is chasing after the plants in the sewer. Like the proverbial blind people with the elephant, they all have a piece of the puzzle but need to put it together to get the whole picture. But everyone’s too busy running around to take five minutes to explain things to somebody else.

Goosebumps Classic: 3 Monster Blood (Goosebumps Classic)

• Item #:NTS503520
• ISBN13:9780545035200
• Format:Paperback Book

$7.99

Buy on Amazon

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

What a boring motif. People refusing to talk to each other and explain things is the storyline for every single romantic comedy ever. And it’s never, ever, clever.

Overall, this season is struggling. The characters don’t feel genuine, the story is cliche, and the rules of the world don’t make sense. While it’s not boring, it is hard to care about anything that’s happening aside from it being fast-paced and fun to watch. So while it might be fairly entertaining, it’s not a show I’m likely to remember fondly or revisit. And we’re already halfway through the season. So if Goosebumps is going to prove me wrong, it had better act fast.

What Lies Below (2020) is a horror film written and directed by Braden R. Duemmler. This TV-MA film stars Ema Horvath, Trey Tucker, and Mena Suvari. The film is available on Hoopla, Tubi TV, Peacock Premium Plus, the Roku Channel, History Vault, and Amazon Prime Video.

Libby (Ema Horvath) returns to her family’s lake house before leaving for college. Her mother (Mena Suvari as Michelle Wells) uses this opportunity to have Libby meet her boyfriend (Trey Tucker as John Smith). Despite the draw of a handsome scientist, the more Libby learns about the man, the stranger he seems.

What I Like about What Lies Below

The film balances the line between sci-fi and supernatural horror. One of those options seems to fit slightly better, but What Lies Below doesn’t feel the need to tell its audience some objective truth. Instead, it respects the viewer to come to their own conclusion.

Ema Horvath has the most to work with and provides an interesting character in Libby. Libby remains a reserved and shy character, displaying an unhealthy dose of longing that requires subtle habits and glances to communicate her thoughts. Yet, the viewer often knows what she’s thinking.

What Lies Below

• What Lies Below
• What Lies Below
• Audience Rating: Unrated (Not Rated)

$12.99

Buy on Amazon

Last update on 2025-01-30 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

That said, there’s a level of camp across all the performances. It’s hard to say if this is an intentional choice but viewing it as an intentional choice adds to these performances. However, it’s worth mentioning this as a hard selling point.

Without diving into spoilers, the ending did surprise me to some degree. I was wrong about how hard What Lies Below would end. In short, this film gets surprisingly dark. It doesn’t linger in that darkness, but What Lies Below doesn’t compromise its plot for a comforting conclusion.

Tired Tropes and Triggers

Body horror seems to be the most obvious trigger to mention. It’s less the body mutating kind of horror and more the parasite growing inside the body kind. Most of this remains implied, or we see only the aftermath, but the points seem clear.

A sexual assault leads to a general shift in the film. Part of this assault is handled with uncomfortable realism as the survivor doubts the severity of the assault and receives pushback when she reveals the truth. While this realism certainly has its place, it also deserves a warning.

What I Dislike about What Lies Below

This film might have been better served diving into its campier side instead of loosely adding those moments. Ultimately, the performances suffer from a lack of commitment, teetering between a serious approach or a campier execution.

What Lies Below is far from a high-budget film. While it can hide its lower budget, there are clear moments that visibly show the strain. If it committed to the camp or creativity of many B-films, it might better haunt its viewers. 

What Lies Below only loosely attempts to channel the creature feature. It occasionally introduces something more bestial and inhuman but doesn’t give more than a glimpse. With the revelry given to lampreys and the title, I wrongly suspected something within the watery depths to show.

While the film remains dark, I won’t particularly call it haunting. While the seductive creature isn’t as common as its female counterpart, it’s far from an untested concept. The major problem with What Lies Below is that it doesn’t do enough to stand out or linger in the mind. Instead, it hints at something brewing, smacks you with a dark end, and calls it a day.

Final Thoughts

What Lies Below implements elements of a memorable creature feature but fails to haunt its viewers. While its restraint in explaining its plot deserves respect, it doesn’t supplement that with something terrifying enough to break the surface. It’s hard to recommend this film to eager viewers looking for a creature in its feature. Instead, it might better suit an audience who craves a subtle mystery by the lakeside.
(2.5 / 5)