Continuing my series exploring YouTube with Ask a Mortician and Obsolete Oddity, I will now focus on Maya Deren, since many of her films can be found there. This isn’t so much of a review, or a foray into film criticism, symbology, theory or meaning (there is plenty of that out there if you wish to seek it), but rather a personal exploration of a late great filmmaker. Born in 1917, Maya Deren was a Ukranian-American filmographer best known for her film and choreography work in the 1940s and 1950s. She was very involved in the amateur film movement (focusing on the edge & fringe stuff, kind of like punk in its day), experimental film and the avant-garde.
What I appreciate most about Maya Deren’s films is that they have a rather disturbing surreal quality that is further enhanced by how scenes are cut and transitioned, their timing and perspective, and a more conceptual influence rather than a focus on space and time as we perceive it physically. Every movement has a sense of meaning and significance. Actions, costuming and backdrop become very impactful, not because of high budgets or involved underpinnings, but because of how things flow together. The result feels accessible but not entirely tangible, like a journey into the subconscious or a dream-like reality.
I am including three of Maya Deren’s films here for you to enjoy, starting with the most iconic Meshes of the Afternoon and then including my personal favorite At Land and also Witch’s Cradle, a collaboration with Marcel Duchamp.
Meshes of the Afternoon was Maya Deren’s debut film and has been considered among both the best and worst films ever made depending on who you ask. The first time I saw it, I was transfixed. I felt a personal kinship with this filmmaker who lived and worked decades prior to myself for, despite my lack of awareness of her work, I was using many of the same symbols. I had even created a mirror mask that I could wear to engage in performance art – a one-way mirror that from the outside reflected the viewer’s visage back at them while I could see everything through it and engage accordingly. Other references and relationships with objects (broken glass, mannequins, flowers, keys, possible suicide) had also appeared in my work. I had also experimented a bit in video in film speed and intentional repetition. I watched the film over and over again, each time picking out more details than the time prior.
At Land is my personal favorite of Maya Deren’s films. I can relate all too well to some of those high class socialite dinner parties where you feel out of place, trying to crawl your way through all of the artifice. I love the transitions and the sense of journey that comes across. The joy, the anxiety, the betrayal… seeking that which you thought you had lost. To me, it’s the ultimate dreamscape adventure-quest, but then again my dreams are not ordinary. Again note: I am not trying to interpret or examine symbology so much as share my personal reaction.
I love all of the occult references and the repetition of time in this. The exploration of time plays a critical role in all of Maya Deren’s works, but it strikes even more so in this one in particular. Having originally majored in Fiber Arts, I also enjoy the strings that weave through and intertwine between everything. But more than anything, I love “Is The Beginning Is The End…” I have used a similar mantra before in several performance art pieces as a chant, and also as a written work, to further explore narrative as just something one enters into and slips out of, not anything with a definitive start and ending. Like Schmendrick in The Last Unicorn movie says, “There are no happy endings. Because nothing ends.”
Advertisement
Anyway, for all that this isn’t technically a review, I give Maya Deren 4.5 Cthulus.
(4.5 / 5)
You can take it or leave it. Personally, I love her work but I know not everyone shares this sentiment, especially anyone who didn’t want to go so much in depth into older works and found themselves in a film criticism class devoted to such pieces. Because if you were expecting to analyze Don’t Hug Me I’m Scared and then wound up back in the 1940s and 50s, that may not have been your cup of tea (for all that the historical references and symbols can shed more meaning on the current). And please be aware: I posted all of these links to silent versions of the films because those are truer to the original, but there are many lovely interpretations involving various soundscapes and audio interpretations if you prefer, just look on YouTube.
Jennifer Weigel is a multi-disciplinary mixed media conceptual artist residing in Kansas USA. Weigel utilizes a wide range of media to convey her ideas, including assemblage, drawing, fibers, installation, jewelry, painting, performance, photography, sculpture, video and writing. You can find more of her work at:
https://www.jenniferweigelart.com/
Smile 2, a psychological supernatural horror, released in October 2024 just in time for Halloween, sees director Parker Finn (Smile, Laura Hasn’t Slept) return with a sequel starring Naomi Scott (Aladdin) as pop star and recovering addict Skye Riley. While Smile 2 boasts a talented cast, it ultimately falls short of its predecessor, offering a familiar storyline with minor variations and a predictable finale. The film attempts to introduce a new method to combat the parasitic ‘Smile Entity’, but this addition fails to elevate the sequel beyond a pale imitation of its chilling predecessor.
The Plot.
Smile 2 begins shortly after the end of the original; just six days after Rose Cotter’s death. During a short interlude scene, we watch as the now cursed Joel attempts to pass the Smile Entity on by killing one criminal in front of another. The plan backfires spectacularly, inadvertently passing the curse onto an innocent bystander named Lewis Fregoli.
The film then shifts gears, introducing Skye Riley, a singer and performer making a triumphant return to the spotlight with a comeback tour after a tumultuous past. During a candid interview on the Drew Barrymore Show, Skye opens up about her struggles with addiction and the devastating loss of her boyfriend in a car accident. Her sobriety journey, however, faces a severe setback when she seeks pain relief from her old high school friend, the unwitting Lewis Fregoli. In a chilling turn of events, Lewis takes his own life while Skye watches, passing the Smile Entity onto her. Unaware of her new cursed existence Skye gets on with rehearsing for her tour, but she begins to notice that strange things are happening. People are smiling at her in an unnatural way and she becomes the target of anonymous attacks and aggressions. When text messages begin to arrive from an unknown number, Skye decides to get some answers.
Highlights.
Let’s not beat about the bush. I found Smile 2 difficult to finish and was struggling at about the hour-and-a-half mark to stay awake. That being said it’s worth watching because everyone needs to see the 3-minute scene of the ‘smilers’ chasing Skye through her apartment. This was possibly the creepiest thing I’ve seen on a screen. The buildup, the synchronicity of the movement of the actors and their positioning, the camera work, and the lighting. I have rewatched it several times and it doesn’t get old. If you are only interested in watching this, fast forward to the 123-minute mark and get ready to be impressed.
Drawbacks.
Where do I start?
My primary concern with Smile 2 is its striking resemblance to its predecessor. The narrative follows a familiar pattern: an attractive woman fleeing a supernatural force, grappling with hallucinations, experiencing a mental health decline, and culminating in the revelation someone close to Skye was the Smiling Entity after all. This repetitive structure diminishes the film’s impact.
Advertisement
While the introduction of a new method for shedding the entity initially offered a glimmer of hope this concept wasn’t fully realized. It just served to add names to the line of people that the entity has infected in the past.
Furthermore, the film’s pacing suffers from excessive focus on Skye’s musical career. Scenes showcasing her stage rehearsals and music videos, while intended to establish her identity as a performer, feel unnecessary and detract from the narrative momentum. Yes, we understand she’s a performer, you told us, you don’t need to prove it. These scenes appear to artificially inflate the film’s runtime, suggesting a lack of confidence in the core story.
The Final Take.
Ultimately, Smile 2 fails to expand upon the established lore of the franchise. The film’s conclusion feels contrived, with a blatant setup for a third installment. Hopefully, if a ‘Smile 3’ is inevitable, the creative team will bring fresh ideas and avoid simply retreading familiar ground.
We’re back again with Goosebumps The Vanishing, episode two. A story too big for one episode, apparently.
Or, maybe this is just a nod to the fact that Stay Out Of The Basement was a two-part episode in the original 1995 show. Either way, after seeing this episode, we could have kept it to one.
The story
We begin this second episode with Anthony investigating the parasitic plant taking over his body. Rather than, I don’t know, going to the hospital, he’s decided to phone a colleague and send her some samples from the bulb he pulls out of his arm with a handheld garden trowel.
Meanwhile, Devin is having his own worries. He’s haunted by what he saw in the sewers. So, he gets CJ to go with him to investigate. What they find is more of the tendrils of the plant that dragged him down through the manhole last episode.
Advertisement
I sure would have liked to see more about that.
Instead, we see Devin pivot to flirting with a newly single Frankie. Because teenage hormones I guess.
Meanwhile, Trey is having a terrible day. First, his girlfriend leaves him. Then, Anthony breaks his car window.
Needing a way to deal with his frustration, Trey decides to break into the Brewers’ basement. There, he starts wrecking up the place. Until he meets the plant creature and has an unfortunate accident.
What worked
The big difference between this episode and the last is the increased gross-out factor. This episode had some straight-up cringy moments. From the tendrils waiving from Anthony’s arm to the whole goat he brings home to feed his new pet, this episode was skin-crawling gross in the best way possible.
Advertisement
The series is called Goosebumps, after all.
What didn’t work
Unfortunately, that’s where my praise ends. This episode, unlike the last, just wasn’t that great.
To start with, there was a lot of unnecessary drama between characters who are not in danger of being eaten by a plant from the inside out.
I especially disliked the focus on the Frankie/Trey/Devin love triangle.
Now, I don’t hate it. This part of the story adds extra emotional depth to the show. We can see why Trey would be especially incensed by his girlfriend falling for the son of the neighbor he’s feuding with. But it would be more enjoyable if it wasn’t so cliche and dramatic.
Advertisement
I hate the way Trey tried to gaslight Frankie. It makes me dislike him when he should be a sympathetic character. I hate how whiny Devin is every time he talks to Frankie. And I hated the impassioned speech Frankie gives after Devin asks her why she was with Trey.
Listen, I understand what we’re going for here. Devin and Cece are not struggling financially. They’re doing alright, and their new friends here in Gravesend are not. We kind of got that without Frankie claiming that her socioeconomic status is why she’s dating a bully and gaslighter. It felt out of place. It felt like pandering. It certainly didn’t feel like something an eighteen-year-old would say. I hated it.
Finally, there was a moment near the end of the episode that irritated me. I don’t want to give too much detail because I wouldn’t dare ruin an R.L. Stine cliffhanger. But, well, it doesn’t make a lot of sense.
I get that we’re watching a show about a carnivorous plant that is going to wreak havoc on this family and neighborhood. I understand the suspension of disbelief. Some might even say I am a little too generous with it. So I can buy into a teenager being absorbed by a plant and turned into a monstrous version of himself.
I can’t buy into what happens at the end of this episode. It doesn’t make sense with the rules established. It certainly doesn’t make any sort of scientific or logical sense. It is a lazy moment meant to further the storyline but threatens the structural integrity of the season.
Advertisement
All in all, this wasn’t the best episode of Goosebumps. But it’s only the second episode. Honestly, the season has plenty of time to go either way.
The movie monsters always approach so slowly. Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream. It takes forever for them to catch their victims.
Their stiff joints arcing in jerky, erratic movements As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry – It takes forever for them to catch their victims. And yet no one ever seems to get away.
As they awkwardly shamble towards their quarry – Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly… And yet no one ever seems to get away. Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it?
Scenes shift, plot thickens, minutes tick by endlessly… While the camera pans to a wide-eyed scream. Seriously, how long does it take to make a break for it? The movie monsters always approach so slowly.
Robot Dance from Jennifer Weigel’s Reversals series
So my father used to enjoy telling the story of Thriller Nite and how he’d scare his little sister, my aunt. One time they were watching the old Universal Studios Monsters version of The Mummy, and he pursued her at a snail’s pace down the hallway in Boris Karloff fashion. Both of them had drastically different versions of this tale, but essentially it was a true Thriller Nite moment. And the inspiration for this poem.