Connect with us

Published

on

Among the many movies based on Stephen King books, The Langoliers has a reputation for being kind of silly.

This is entirely unfair. I mean, it wasn’t a scary movie, exactly. Not in a bloody, gory, jump scare sort of way. It was scary in more of real life, time not on our side allegory sort of way.

Based on a novella, this three-hour-long movie came out as a miniseries in 1995. Proving that even Stephen King isn’t long enough for some people.

If you haven’t heard the story before, here are the basics. A group of people on a plane somehow get phased out of time and, for lack of a better term, left behind.

The cast is exactly what you’d expect in a Stephen King cast. I swear you could pop these people out and put them right into any other story. The strong men in charge, Captain Brian Engle and Nick Hopewell. The mentally handicapped, I mean crippled, I mean a blind child with magic powers, Dinah. The clever old man, who also happens to be the writer, Bob Jenkins. And, of course, the lovely strong woman who nevertheless takes a backseat and lets the men handle things, Laurel Stevenson. 

These characters aren’t cookie-cutter, but they are exactly the same people King always writes. They’re the cast of The Stand all over again. The only real unique character is the antagonist, Mr. Toomey.

He was fun. A high-strung type A who always feels like he’s behind. Even better, he’s always behind because of everybody else holding him back. As a child, his twisted father told him about creatures called The Langoliers who ate up lazy children.

Now, the fact that most of the characters are typecast doesn’t matter. Because they’re just there to move through this weird world outside of time. A world where everything feels stale. The food is tasteless. Matches don’t light. The air feels like you’re standing in a room no living being has been in in years.

All that aside, the characters have free reign of the airport. And that’s always a fun premise. I think everyone has fantasies of being alone in a big public place like an airport, a mall or a library. The atmosphere is both fascinating and skin crawling. 

The movie would have been a straight SciFi, if not for Mr. Toomey. He is, without a doubt, one of the creepiest King antagonists ever. He is behind time, late in the worst sense. And he’s developing all kinds of weird ticks. Like slowly ripping paper into thin strips. Or brutally murdering his fellow passengers.

There’s this great analogy in this movie, about a whale who lives its whole life at the bottom of the sea. It’s lived all its life with the pressure of all of that water on it. So much so that if this whale should ever be brought to the surface, its body wouldn’t survive. But in the moments before death, what a relief it must be to have all that pressure gone. That’s one of the moments that sticks out the most when I think of this movie.

The other thing that sticks out is the reprehensible cocoa puffs with teeth that are the langoliers. If this movie suffered from anything, it is poor special effects. These langoliers were bad, they were just bad. There have been two horror movies that have made me laugh out loud when I saw the monsters. This is one of them.

Not enough could ever be said about how laughable these creatures were. I don’t know how they could have been done better. But I know that if Night of the Living Dead could scare the hell out of me on the budget it had, someone could have done a lot better with this.

All that being said, The Langoliers is a decent movie. If you saw it when you were younger and it didn’t grab you, try it again. I honestly think it’s a horror movie for grownups only. And if you’ve never seen it, there’s no better time than now. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movies n TV

The Formal Introduction of Evil’s “The Demon of Sex”

“The Demon of Sex” is the third episode of Evil’s season 3. The assessors investigate a new marriage that struggles with intimacy.

Published

on

“The Demon of Sex” is the third episode of Evil’s season 3, created by Michelle King and Robert King. The central cast includes Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, Michael Emerson, Christine Lahti, and Andrea Martin. As of this review, it’s available through Netflix and Paramount+ and its add-ons.

The assessors investigate a new marriage that struggles with intimacy. Kristen (Katja Herbers) takes control of her family. Ben (Aasif Mandvi) has an existential crisis after facing plumbing difficulties. Sheryl (Christine Lahti) struggles with the new work culture. Sister Andrea (Andrea Martin) battles a demon.

Evil written in bold, a snake reaches for an apple. Beneath reads Season 3
Evil Season 3 Cover

What I Like about “The Demon of Sex”

Ben usually seems underutilized as a character, especially in personal development, but season 3 works hard to rectify that issue. A skeptic’s disillusionment is an obvious choice for this type of character, but the writing and Aasif Mandvi’s performance drive the execution. It also adds another dynamic to his character referenced throughout the series, if rarely shown again, in the Science League.

“The Demon of Sex” is also a good episode for Sheryl, who struggles and triumphs in her new position. While her character trajectory teeters back and forth, “The Demon of Sex” shows what her development can look like when given the attention it deserves.

Sale
Evil: Season Three [DVD]
  • Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi (Actors)
  • Robert King (Director)
  • Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Sale
Evil: Season Three [Blu-Ray]
  • Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi (Actors)
  • Robert King (Director)
  • Audience Rating: NR (Not Rated)

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

“The Demon of Sex” also furthers the frenemy relationship between Kristen and Sister Andrea, providing ample material for both characters to explore. “The Demon of Sex” shows Kristen’s willingness to compromise and furthers Sister Andrea’s character flaws.

Leland (Michael Emerson) finally finds an attack that might work on Sister Andrea, beginning a plot thread to explore across the season. Commenting on this plot point might give credit to future episodes, but it’s a compelling example of Leland actually being devious and in control.

“The Demon of Sex” leans on Evil’s dark comedic tone, not intending to haunt the viewer but to entertain them. It dives further into the comical nature of corporate evil and marketing, showing a general shallowness in both arenas in which exploitation occurs. It’s dark, troubling, and entertaining without pulling its punches.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

In an episode titled “The Demon of Sex,” the titular demon seems to hold conflicting motives. First, it grows strong in the married couple’s abstinence, which suggests a different focus. But when acts become carnal, it’s the general kinkiness that makes the demon strong. Considering the couple talks about their troubles with a licensed therapist, it seems to evoke a general kink shame to the execution. However, the therapy also fails to resolve the underlying issues.

A slightly gory moment might unsettle some viewers, but it’s a single moment in an otherwise goreless episode.

A nun smiles at someone not revealed in the image, holding a notebook.
A Nun with a Notebook to Save Your Marriage

What I Dislike about “The Demon of Sex”

As mentioned in a previous review, another demon seems to indicate a more direct concept of “sex,” while the motives of this demon seem more complex. It’s a minor point, but I can’t fathom why they didn’t connect this title with the more literal succubus that’s plagued this season already. Addressing that demon also seems like a more logical entry point as the audience sees what it’s been doing.

“The Demon of Sex” sets the groundwork for future plot points. While not a fault of the episode, it blends in the background, doing what it needs to and little more. I don’t mean to pretend this is a negative, but it doesn’t haunt the viewer like past or future episodes.

A kraken emerges from the sea to devour a ship. A brown tint suggests an old map marking

Final Thoughts

“The Demon of Sex” delivers but remains buried around more memorable episodes with more lasting power. It sets up key points for several characters and allows some to shine, but it doesn’t hold iconic moments to look back on. Ultimately, it functions as intended and keeps the audience eager for future developments.

3 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

A Journey from Cosmic Horror to Shell Beach, or Dark City (1998)

Dark City (1998) is an R-rated Cosmic Horror film directed by Alex Proyas, often earning the fitting labels of tech noir.

Published

on

Dark City (1998) is a Cosmic Horror film directed by Alex Proyas, though I’ve seen labels of tech noir, which certainly fits. This R-rated film stars Rufus Sewell, Kiefer Sutherland, Jennifer Connelly, and William Hurt. As of this review, Dark City is available to Kanopy and Amazon Prime Video subscribers, with additional purchase options on other services. 

John Murdoch (Rufus Sewell) wakes up in a hotel bathtub, plagued with strange memories and amnesia. Chased by strangers, he follows his memories of Emma (Jennifer Connelly), avoiding those who hunt him in his desperate attempt to understand his situation. As mysterious forces hinder him, Dr. Daniel Schreber (Kiefer Sutherland) claims to know secrets that might help. Emma Murdock (Jennifer Connelly) haunts him.

Dark City written in red. A man stands crucified over a cross. Below are four people looking in different directions.
Dark City Alt Cover

What I Like about Dark City

Dark City earned 12 awards and an additional 19 nominations. These recognitions include the 1999 Saturn Award from the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films and the 1998 Bram Stoker Award. In short, Dark City earns a strong critical reception.

Part detective tale and part cosmic horror, Dark City lures its viewer in with its aesthetic and premise. I hesitate in saying that the mystery drives the film as the beginning narration does spill most of the finer points. However, Rufus Sewell delivers a performance of someone so overwhelmed and out of his element that the terror shows despite our knowledge. This film wants the audience to know the mystery, focusing on characters learning the truth to hook them.

Dark City (Director’s Cut) [Blu-ray]
  • Factory sealed DVD
  • Rufus Sewell, William Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland (Actors)
  • Alex Proyas (Director)
Dark City
  • Amazon Prime Video (Video on Demand)
  • Rufus Sewell, William Hurt, Kiefer Sutherland (Actors)
  • Alex Proyas (Director) – Alex Proyas (Writer) – Andrew Mason (Producer)

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Every performance nails its particular niche. From Kiefer Sutherland’s Dr. Schreber’s untrustworthy scientist to Jennifer Connelly’s mysterious Emma, each performance enriches the plot. This praise belongs to the entire cast, as many performances hold nuances that make sense after learning the entire truth.

Dark City maintains tension for most of its runtime, with the ending being an exception. That isn’t to say that the film fails to create a haunting story, but the focus shifts as the characters learn more about their situation. While both parts of the film accomplish their objectives, it does minimize the horror.

White background, rubber stamp with disclaimer pressed against the white background.
Disclaimer Kimberley Web Design

Tired Tropes and Triggers

At the backdrop of this story, there’s a serial killer murdering sex workers. It’s a familiar plotline, and Dark City doesn’t push against its familiarity in most aspects. However, the reasons behind this plot are somewhat more complex beyond simple shock value.

There was one notable voyeuristic nude scene, but the first naked body is Rufus Sewell’s John. Besides these moments, Dark City doesn’t lend itself to voyeurism. Instead, it prefers a largely sexless and detached perspective, which seems common among Lovecraftian-inspired properties.

A man in a trench coat stares in the distance. Behind him is a case.
Rufus Sewell as John Murdoch

What I Dislike about Dark City

As briefly mentioned, Dark City doesn’t deliver a traditional mystery because the beginning narration spoils most of that mystery. While this doesn’t inherently hinder the film, it’s a decision that doesn’t seem to make much sense. Most of the narration gets shown or told to the audience later. It’s as if the audience isn’t trusted to understand these elements. However, this film repeats this information or shows it with better execution, making the narration unnecessary.

Without divulging too much, the ending empowers a particular character that hinders the cosmic horror influences. It’s hard to believe the danger of cosmic forces when they prove to be your equal.

While not a fault of Dark City, The Matrix would focus more on empowering its main character through realizing some truth. Since The Matrix came out a year after this film, Dark City holds a stronger claim to the trend. However, the execution of this plot point goes to The Matrix. Despite the drastically different focus and genres, I can’t help but wonder how much The Matrix’s success has overshadowed this film’s lasting power.

A kraken devours a ship, rising from the sea.

Final Thoughts

Dark City creates a tense journey for audiences to follow, combining cosmic horror and tech noir to create something unique. It’s a cult classic that earned an award after its digital re-release because few films provide its unique mix of genres. If you crave a dark mystery where humanity must adapt to overcome the impossible with a flare of cosmic horror, this film might satisfy your craving.

4 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Continue Reading

Movies n TV

Goosebumps Misses The Mark With Monster Blood

Published

on

Episode four of Goosebumps The Vanishing is named after one of my least favorite of the original Goosebumps book series. I’m clearly in the minority since there are four Monster Blood books. And I’m sad to say that this episode very much lived down to the expectations the book set.

Cover for Goosebumps Monster Blood.

The story

We begin this episode with a flashback. Cece is excited to go to her debate group that Summer. She even brags to her fellow Type A teenage girlfriends. Then, she doesn’t get in.

That’s right, she’s been lying to everyone about going to debate class every day.

However, she still managed to get an interview for a college application. Too bad she gets sick at the meeting. She finds herself back at her mother’s apartment, throwing up in the sink. And if that wasn’t bad enough, the thing she throws up pulls itself out of the sink and tries to attack her.

What worked

I’m not going to lie, this was not a boring episode. Even scenes that were conversations among teen girls in a coffee shop were full of action. At no point did it struggle to keep my attention.

I was also pleased by how the Monster Blood creature looked. Or, whatever this thing is. The way it moved was eerie. The way the characters interacted with it was seamless. This effect was quite well done.

What didn’t work

Unfortunately, that’s where my praise for this episode ends. To start with, the monster still doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. I’ve complained about this in the last few episodes, so I won’t spend a lot of time on this. But it still does not make sense that this sentient spore went from possessing a person to a car to a cup, to then being puked up into its own body. A body made of blood, puke and kombucha.

Sam McCarthy, Galilea La Salvia and Jayden Bartels in Goosebumps, Monster Blood.

I also complained last episode about Cece’s character. She was too perfect. And, as though this episode heard me, we now know that she was never as perfect as she was trying to seem.

However, as far as dark secrets for perfect Type A teens go, this one was weak and cliche. She’s lying to everyone about getting into some fancy debate team. And who hasn’t seen this? Who hasn’t seen this sort of thing before?

While there is nothing new under the sun, there are good ways to redo a cliche. And then, there’s this. It brought nothing new to the table.

This same complaint can be applied to the big conflict of this episode. As of now, we have three groups fighting the same monster from different levels. Frankie, Cece and Devin are being chased by the Monster Blood. Alex and CJ are aware something is wrong, but so far they only think it involves the car. And Anthony is chasing after the plants in the sewer. Like the proverbial blind people with the elephant, they all have a piece of the puzzle but need to put it together to get the whole picture. But everyone’s too busy running around to take five minutes to explain things to somebody else.

Goosebumps Classic: 3 Monster Blood (Goosebumps Classic)
  • Item #:NTS503520
  • ISBN13:9780545035200
  • Format:Paperback Book

Last update on 2025-01-31 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

What a boring motif. People refusing to talk to each other and explain things is the storyline for every single romantic comedy ever. And it’s never, ever, clever.

Overall, this season is struggling. The characters don’t feel genuine, the story is cliche, and the rules of the world don’t make sense. While it’s not boring, it is hard to care about anything that’s happening aside from it being fast-paced and fun to watch. So while it might be fairly entertaining, it’s not a show I’m likely to remember fondly or revisit. And we’re already halfway through the season. So if Goosebumps is going to prove me wrong, it had better act fast.

2.5 out of 5 stars (2.5 / 5)

Continue Reading

Trending